It has been my impression that the New York Times leading writer on climate for the last 15 years, Andy Revkin, has been too close to Gavin Schmidt, James Hansen, and Michael Mann to have much in the way of perspective on their political agenda, or, if you prefer, their scientific agenda. I even argued this to the Times ombudsman shortly after Climategate broke in the fall of 2009.
More from Harold Ambler, who has been getting interested in the Gleick/fakegate saga:






What (exactly) was the “clear malfeasance?”
Best ask Harold on his site where the post was reblogged from.
http://talkingabouttheweather.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/the-sound-of-silence/
Revkin sounds like someone trying very hard to keep attention off his own involvement.
It’s the cover-up that gets ya.