Posted: March 7, 2012 by tallbloke in solar system dynamics

tallbloke:

More from Harold Ambler, who has been getting interested in the Gleick/fakegate saga:

Originally posted on Talking About the Weather:

Andy Revkin's silence on the most important aspect of Fakegate is deafening. It is as though he and Peter Gleick's defenders are hoping the whole thing will just blow over, which it very well could.

It has been my impression that the New York Times leading writer on climate for the last 15 years, Andy Revkin, has been too close to Gavin Schmidt, James Hansen, and Michael Mann to have much in the way of perspective on their political agenda, or, if you prefer, their scientific agenda. I even argued this to the Times ombudsman shortly after Climategate broke in the fall of 2009. I was just aghast how comfortable Revkin was explaining away what was clearly malfeasance by his go-to list of scientific sources. Less than two weeks later, Revkin had left the news side of the Times, which was a strange coincidence. And, yes, I understand, nothing more.

Perched as he remains at the Times’ as the primary blogger on its Dot Earth Blog, he likes to insist that he is no longer part of the news apparatus at all. Particularly…

View original 562 more words

Comments
  1. David Appell says:

    What (exactly) was the “clear malfeasance?”

  2. Brian H says:

    Revkin sounds like someone trying very hard to keep attention off his own involvement.

    It’s the cover-up that gets ya.