Boris Johnson: ‘We Should Get Fracking Right Away’

Posted: December 10, 2012 by tallbloke in alarmism, Energy, humour, Politics, Robber Barons

UPDATE: 12/12/12 The UK’s Prime Minister David Cameron has put his weight behind the dash for shale gas.
From the Independent:

Britain must be at the heart of a “shale gas revolution”, David Cameron has said, which could bring down energy prices and help “re-industrialise” the economy.

Giving his public backing for plans to exploit the country’s onshore gas reserves – which is expected to be given the go-ahead by the Government very shortly – Mr Cameron said the new technology could transform our energy supplies.

But his stance was attacked by climate change scientists and energy experts who warned his dash-to-gas policy was “misleading and dangerous”.

Giving evidence to MPs Mr Cameron pointed to America where fracking for shale gas had allowed the country to become virtually self-sufficient in gas.

He said he wanted Britain to play a full part in the “revolution underway” and criticised environmentalists who were opposed to exploiting the technology.

“I think some in the green movement really want us to rule out gas and opt right now for nuclear plus renewables plus energy efficiency. Zip. That’s it,” he said.

“I think that would be a mistake. It maybe that this gas revolution is really quite transformative and there is going to be a lot more gas and the price won’t be as expensive as some people think.

“We should take part in fracking because this might be a revolution and if we ignored it completely we could be giving our economy much higher energy prices than would otherwise be necessary.”

 

In his Daily Telegraph Column, London Mayor Boris Johnson speaks out for shale gas, and examines why the Greens, LibDems and bEUrocrats are against its exploitation. He also tells a couple of home truths along the way about nuclear and renewable energy. Go Boris.

Ignore the doom merchants, Britain should get fracking
Boris Johnson in the Daily Telegraph

Boris JohnsonIf it were not so serious there would be something ludicrous about the reaction of the green lobby to the discovery of big shale gas reserves in this country. Here we are in the fifth year of a downturn. We have pensioners battling fuel poverty. We have energy firms jacking up their prices. We have real worries about security of energy supply – a new building like the Shard needs four times as much juice as the entire town of Colchester.

Our nukes are so high-maintenance that the cost of disposing of their spent fuel rods is put at about £100 billion – more than the value of all the electricity they have produced since the Fifties. The hills and dales of Britain are being forested with white satanic mills, and yet the total contribution of wind power is still only about 0.4 per cent of Britain’s needs. Wave power, solar power, biomass – their collective oomph wouldn’t pull the skin off a rice pudding. We are prevented from putting in a new system of coal-fired power stations, since that would breach our commitments under Kyoto. We are therefore increasingly and humiliatingly dependent on Vladimir Putin’s gas or on the atomic power of the French state.

And then in the region of Blackpool – as if by a miracle – we may have found the solution. The extraction of shale gas by hydraulic fracture, or fracking, seems an answer to the nation’s prayers. There is loads of the stuff, apparently – about 1.3 trillion barrels; and if we could get it out we could power our toasters and dishwashers for the foreseeable future. By offering the hope of cheap electricity, fracking would make Britain once again competitive in sectors of industry – bauxite smelting springs to mind – where we have lost hope.

The extraction process alone would generate tens of thousands of jobs in parts of the country that desperately need them. And above all, the burning of gas to generate electricity is much, much cleaner – and produces less CO2 – than burning coal. What, as they say, is not to like?

In their mad denunciations of fracking, the Greens and the eco-warriors betray the mindset of people who cannot bear a piece of unadulterated good news. Beware this new technology, they wail. Do not tamper with the corsets of Gaia! Don’t probe her loamy undergarments with so much as a finger — or else the goddess of the earth will erupt with seismic revenge. Dig out this shale gas, they warn, and our water will be poisoned and our children will be stunted and our cattle will be victims of terrible intestinal explosions. Yesterday the Observer found some political support for the gloomsters, in the form of a German MEP. His name is Jo Leinan, and it seems he is a prominent member of the Euro-parliament’s energy committee. There were only two countries interested in this procedure, he said – Poland and Britain.

And according to Herr Leinan, neither of us knows what we are getting ourselves into. We are about to release the pent-up shale gas of Britain from its sinister cavities beneath Lancashire and Sussex, and anything can happen. Before we touch the integuments of the planet, he says, the European parliament will produce some regulations to “discipline” the operation.

Regulations? From the Euro-parliament? And these people wonder why we in Britain are increasingly determined to have a referendum on our membership of the EU. I am sure that the SPD politician means well, but just what in the name of hell has it got to do with him? Before he draws up any regulations for the British fracking market, he might care to look at what has been going on in America in the past four years, where the discovery of large quantities of shale gas is turning into one of the most significant political events since the end of the Cold War.

In 2008 the cost of natural gas in the US was $8 a unit. It is now $3 a unit. In China it is still up at $12 a unit – and the result is that the US is now competitive in industries such as fertilisers and chemicals that American politicians had long since assumed were lost to low-cost economies of the East. As a result of the use of gas, the Americans have cut their CO2 emissions to levels not seen since the Nineties, in spite of a growing population.

Indeed, the Americans have now actually met their obligations under the Kyoto protocol on climate change – and they never even signed up for it. The shale gas industry is a huge employer, and has so far contributed $50 billion in tax. As for the anxieties about water poisoning or a murrain on the cattle, there have been 125,000 fracks in the US, and not a single complaint to the Environmental Protection Agency.

It is no wonder that some of the more heroic spirits in the Coalition Government are saying that we should get our act together, and make use of what nature has bestowed on Lancashire and elsewhere. As soon as he became Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson announced that he was going to make life easy for potential frackers, with a one-stop permit system. He has the support of George Osborne, who hailed the potential of fracking in the Autumn Statement.

Alas, we are in a Coalition, and the Liberals run the Department of Energy and Climate Change. They have announced a moratorium on fracking, claiming that there have been earthquakes in the Blackpool area – even though there are tiny quakes every day. In what they thought was a cunning move, the Lib Dems also leaked the location of two big reserves of shale gas – in Tatton and Shropshire North. Much to his credit, Owen Paterson immediately announced that he was all in favour of fracking his constituency if it would deliver jobs and growth, and he is dead right. The shale gas discovery is hateful to the Libs and the Greens, because it destroys their narrative about the ever rising cost of hydrocarbons. It is glorious news for humanity. It doesn’t need the subsidy of wind power. I don’t know whether it will work in Britain, but we should get fracking right away.

Comments
  1. Caz says:

    Unusually I can not fault one word of what Boris says.

    This is history in the making

  2. Sparks says:

    It’s strange how, as major technological advancements are made, fuel used for our energy is always going the other way, consumer cost for fuel and electricity always rise. And consumer cost for food and habitation go up. Scarcity has always worked, supply and demand for domestic consumers is a game of two half’s, when prices go up less fuel is used, when prices go down more fuel is used, Where Scarcity is implied market manipulation is used.

    If your job is to restrict population growth and quench energy use, then making cheap abundant resources more expensive and unfordable for the majority will be a secondary priority, but a priority nonetheless, your first priority would be to ‘corner’ the political market so-to-speak, elected people can claim they are acting in the interest of the people who elected them, but in reality they are self-serving opportunistic parasites which has been proven as fact time after time, Fuel and energy manipulation NOW that’s a job for politicians, I’ve three cups of lies and one pea of truth, find the pea.

    BTW you’re never going to find the pea.

  3. michael hart says:

    Not difficult for me to agree with most of what Boris says.

    The more savvy members of the anti-nuclear lobby have long known that nuclear power can be made to be uneconomic as long as it can be burdened with sufficient regulatory/planning costs at all points, and sufficient doubt of future liabilities. Simple delay by due-process is sufficient to frighten investors away from projects that have large front-loaded capital requirements.

    If no technical improvements in reactor design or waste-processing are even attempted then the industry will remain on the back foot in the UK, dependent on military support at the political level.

  4. oldbrew says:

    Sparks says: ‘BTW you’re never going to find the pea’

    Not even in UN Agenda 21 :-?

  5. JohnM says:

    Funny how everyone thinks things are going to get better with a department for shale (etc)
    The easiest way to slow things to less than a crawl is to form a committee to oversee things, and a department is much worse.

  6. tallbloke says:

    Post updated, David Cameron pitches in.

  7. oldbrew says:

    Fracking gets the official green light.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fracking-is-back-controversial-gas-extraction-process-to-resume-in-uk-8412382.html

    ‘Overall shale gas reserves are thought to be present across 60 per cent of the British landmass’

  8. Brian H says:

    Sanity attack! Run for the hills! Your Narrative™ is at stake!

    Jeez. Could the bleedin’ obvious actually strike a winning blow? Would politics ever recover?

  9. Murray says:

    Go Boris! I knew there was a reason I voted for you before leaving Ol’ Blighty