Good to see this. I think there is more research being encouraged in directions which might assist us in our analysis of planetary solar relationships these days:
We solicit manuscripts on this general subject for inclusion in a Topical Issue of Solar Physics. The deadline for submission of statements of interest with a tentative i) title, ii) abstract, iii) author list, iv) estimated number of Solar Physics pages, and v) three suggestions for referees, preferably with E-Mail, is 1 November 2010, and the deadline for manuscript submission is 31 December 2010.
This Topical Issue is an outgrowth of the workshop “The Origin, Evolution, and Diagnosis of Solar Flare Magnetic Fields and Plasmas: Honoring the Contributions of Dick Canfield”, which was held at HAO of NCAR in Boulder, Colorado, August 2010. This Topical Issue is not a conference proceedings, and it is not limited to research presented at the workshop. All submissions must be completed original papers that meet the regular quality of the Journal. The Topical Issue will start off with several invited reviews to summarize the subject and frame the work in the research papers which follow. Please consult Solar Physics 265, 2010 for a recent Topical Issue. Topics to be included in the Topical Issue include:
# radiation transport theory and diagnostics of flare plasmas
# flare and CME energy storage and release, and the ensuing dynamics
# the measurement and analysis of vector magnetic fields
# the connections between solar magnetic fields and disturbances in the interplanetary medium
The last two items look particularly promising. 🙂
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
This what gets my goat!
None of these processes would occur without the result of rotation and the complex process it develops.
Can the density of mass be proven to change with motion?
Yes.
So, unwinding density and changing structures is possible in gases and mass.
Joe Lalonde says:
October 1, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Density, as you know, is the ratio between “mass” and “volume”, but what is it “mass”?. How does it vary density?, how is it that “mass” appears?, what is it?.
Everything in in the numbers; obviously you have first 1 and -1, the two original charges, if represented in a circle 1 is the radius, then, how is it so that 1 and -1, both opposed charges combine to give birth to everything we observe?
Click to access unified_field.pdf
So, you are right when you say that everything changes with motion, but it is much more simple than that, this is why Pitagoras only had its Monochord and his ideal squared triangle to figure EVERYTHING out.
We have “forgotten”as far as for us the ideograms, through which this knowledge is transmitted, no longer signify anything to us.
Knowledge is material, as everything in our Universe, so to grasp the faster frequencies, the shortest wavelengths, we have to “resonate” with them, as far as we approach such resonances we can grasp them accordingly.
According to Ray Tomes and quite a few others, matter is formed by standing waves in energy flow. http://ray.tomes.biz/maths.html
@Tallbloke
Which is the same: Opposition of charges create the electromagnetic field, they evolve by turning as the sin and the cosine, achieving several positions., where at 90 degrees (sin 45 and cosine 135 degrees) they generate the magnetic/gravity field up to 0 degrees between them, where Gravity-Matter appears: A three dimensional standing for a while wave/mass/”life”, which is also a “discrete amount” of energy called “quanta”,etc.etc.
What I have found I have found it because of you and your gravity post; a kind of synthesis which obliged me to find a mathematical expression (indeed simple).
It can be much more elaborated by better trained and educated minds.
In fact, now I know how important it was for Pitagoras his squared triangle and its relations in the circle (movement) which it is inscribed in. It was also surprising for me to realize that EVERY RATIO is really a ratio between charges. “Charge” is the translation in today’s terminology of the always existing symbols.
Language is very important to be accepted or rejected, and this needs to be accepted to resolve the entanglement that justifies randomness and chaos, and its obvious consequences. Perhaps this “turning point” or “turning of the screw” may have more consequences than a “robust” conspiracy 🙂
Adolfo,
Motion is far more complex by many factors. Contained motion and free flowing motion are the two types we are used to. But infusing and storing energy is how planets and suns started.
Science NEVER compressed springs in motion to show how energy can be stored and mass can compress this is very interesting in rotation.
Our concept of motion is math of distance and time.
Joe Lalonde says:
October 2, 2010 at 12:39 am
It is only through self conceit that we manage to complicate things: You know: “The Devil is in the details”. We need to get back to the fundamentals which move the universe, before playing the character of God.
Adolfo,
We have had a God over us in this society and where has science evolved?
Into many theories and a great amount of fiction.
The LAWS of thermal dynamics do not include motion or pressure.
Newtons LAWS of motion are based on movement that is infinate which totally fall apart and need other theories to support it for sun expansion and planetary slow down.
The past is not considered nor is motion.
Our arrogance is that WE use the GOD excuse for being ignorant when this planet has remarkably evolved on it’s own with the resources it has used at hand.
Totally interconnected systems.
Adolfo\ Giurfa says:
October 2, 2010 at 12:47 am
“It is only through self conceit that we manage to complicate things: You know: “The Devil is in the details”. We need to get back to the fundamentals which move the universe, before playing the character of God.”
Your right Adolfo, without solid foundation the edifice of science tries to topple this way and that. Scientists spend much time and effort and money trying to prop up this crumbling façade instead of tearing it down and doing the spadework needed to underpin what follows.
Mass = Energy. The multitude of phenomenon we observe are produced by spin and the simple harmonic rules which produce order from chaos. No god required – not even mankind.
Tenuc says:
October 2, 2010 at 5:00 pm
As always you are right. I have completed a new version of my archive:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38598073/Unified-Field
Tenuc says:
October 2, 2010 at 5:00 pm
“Know thyself” reads on the Dephi Oracle. You are God, as the bottle of Klein: You are a Universe which closes in itself.
However there are some differences between me and the center of the galaxy. I do not have such a high frequency. Got to work a lot to be equal to it.
Tenuc says:
Mass = Energy
Is very vague. Like saying mass is gravity.
The process is far more complex.
The LAWS of thermodynamics. Does it include planet rotating at 1669.8 km/hr?
Does it include atmospheric pressure that allows a gas to stay in a water state?
Mass can store energy and so can compressing gases to become water is stored energy.
Centrifugal force is an energy as well that is very little understood.
Plant life use this energy as between gravity and pressure, life would still be in chemical piles.
A gyroscope has extra mass in one dimension because it has extra spin on one plain, motion in two dimensions. Protons, matter, have mass in three dimensions due to spin on two plains. The spin is internal in the constituents of the proton. Kind of like in a crystal lattius, The crystal may have motion but the atoms that make up the crystal have their own motion. The greater the total spin, the more mass and the greater inertia required to effect change in motion. Spinning bundles of charge effect every thing around them. pg
Joe Lalonde says:
October 3, 2010 at 12:23 am
“(Tenuc says:
Mass = Energy)
Is very vague. Like saying mass is gravity.
The process is far more complex.
The LAWS of thermodynamics. Does it include planet rotating at 1669.8 km/hr?
Does it include atmospheric pressure that allows a gas to stay in a water state?
Mass can store energy and so can compressing gases to become water is stored energy.
Centrifugal force is an energy as well that is very little understood.
Plant life use this energy as between gravity and pressure, life would still be in chemical piles.
The process is not more complex – spin is scale invariant and additive.
At the atomic scale – in chemical reactions the newly formed combination of spinning energy ‘packets’ have a small change in energy due to addition spin(s).
At the other end of the scale, the spin(s) of galaxies are in addition to all the composite spins of the energy packets it contains.
Tenuc,
You are correct only to a point.
E=mc2 Does not state it is stored energy. Energy infusion or energy release are still stored energy. Using stored energy changes with time as it is finite and slows down over time. Our current science is based on infinte energy release not changing. so they need theories to help support this with the lame theory that the moon slows down the planet.
It doesn’t include pressure that changes gases to mass either.
Contained energy like live planets in rotation that have a shell to hold mass back in a liquid form of mass. Dry mass and liquid mass also contain compressed gases that add more complexity as well. Gases in rotation can generate back pressure dependant on speed of rotation type of gases, etc.
Not a simple process when rotation can change density with speed as well.
In a perfect Universe setting (like a lab), these values we have in science would be correct.
But, not taken into consideration is solar travel and expansion of the solar system and friction against particulates in space. These use energy and chip away at the current energy being stored.
The suns energy is diffused with distance as the compacted molecules are more diffused over the further distances in a circle.
Also, the speed our solar system travels in space.
Joe Lalonde says:
October 3, 2010 at 12:23 am et “Al”:
Do not complicate things. To start with: How is it so that C sqr2?, was it not that C can not be more that 299,792,458 meters/second…and you square it?!!, what the heck is that? Nuke tests only transformed just a little of “mass”.
Forget everything, let us return to simple mathematics. Of course, it is a matter of comprehension not of simple knowing, not of “parrot like” learning.
Take a humble monochord, the not so complicated NUMBERS and elemental geometry.
You will not be able to do this UNLESS you sacrify self conceit and many of those niceties which make you believe you are so intelligent as to deal with n+1 dimensions 🙂
Joe Lalonde says:
October 3, 2010 at 10:19 am
“E=mc2 Does not state it is stored energy. Energy infusion or energy release are still stored energy. Using stored energy changes with time as it is finite and slows down over time.”
Sorry, Joe, if my reply was unclear. I think E=mc^2 is only an approximation of the relationship between mass and energy, with mc^2 meaning lots and lots!
What we perceive as mass is simply bundles of energy spinning along one or more axes, in many different both ‘stable’ and ‘unstable’ configurations – so only energy exists and the dense clumps of matter we see is just ‘concentrated’ energy. The energy of these spins is never lost, rather it is passed from system to system by ‘collision’ or ‘drag’ from the ether.
We perceive that energy seems to have many different forms, but the reality is we are just observing the one and only type of energy manifesting many different effects.
Adolfo Giurfa says:
October 2, 2010 at 6:34 pm
“…I have completed a new version of my archive:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38598073/Unified-Field“
Success – managed to download your PDF from scribd!
The paper is nice and clear, but would it be possible to explain how the ‘pebble’ operates in 3D?
I’m trying to ‘evolve’ some ideas/rules about harmonics and how they can work to quantise spin. I’d like to use your paper on Unified Field as a start point for this, if that’s OK with you? At the moment, however, I haven’t even got a virus able to replicate:-)
Any ideas would be welcome!
P.G. Sharrow says:
October 3, 2010 at 3:44 am
“A gyroscope has extra mass in one dimension because it has extra spin on one plain, motion in two dimensions. Protons, matter, have mass in three dimensions due to spin on two plains. The spin is internal in the constituents of the proton. Kind of like in a crystal lattius, The crystal may have motion but the atoms that make up the crystal have their own motion. The greater the total spin, the more mass and the greater inertia required to effect change in motion. Spinning bundles of charge effect every thing around them. pg”
Good stuff, PG.
Amazing what even a crude gyroscope can do to change the mass/energy balance:-
Prof Eric Laithwaite took out patents to harness this effect to create a drive for spaceships – good overview and link to the patents here:-
The Incredible Genius Of Prof. Eric Laithwaite
http://www.rense.com/general42/genius.htm
Tenuc says:
Amazing what even a crude gyroscope can do to change the mass/energy balance
I had never heard of this person before but the amazing thing is I have been working on rotation and energy at the power generation level.
This is what I have been trying to explain to you about how mass can change it’s density through rotation and store energy.
Have you ever heard of inverting a turbine? This energy comes in completely from a angle never tried before but the efficiency is amazing as centrifugal force works with the turbine and not against it.
Something to think about…if you rotated an airplane propeller fast enough, it will not move the plane. Why?
You are also correct that energy starts from one source at this time and space that broke up the energy into different avenues.
Tenuc says:
October 3, 2010 at 6:02 pm
Of course it´s OK 🙂
Tenuc,
I use a proxy no one has in science and that was not around in Newton’s time. A coil spring makes an excellent proxy for showing how to compress mass in rotation and store and release energy stored.