 | Phoenix44 on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… |
 | saighdear on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… |
| saighdear on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… |
 | energywise on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… |
 | brianrlcatt on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… |
| saighdear on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… |
| saighdear on Suggestions-50 |
 | oldbrew on Exploding nova alert |
| oldbrew on Suggestions-50 |
| Phoenix44 on Exploding nova alert |
| oldbrew on Why is June so cold and when w… |
| oldbrew on Why is June so cold and when w… |
 | liardetg on Why is June so cold and when w… |
 | stpaulchuck on New discovery reveals that oce… |
| brianrlcatt on Suggestions-50 |
Zeke fowarded this pdf by regular contributor Adolfo Giurfa to me. I think it has some interesting ideas in, though I don’t fully understand the theory as a whole. However, that is no reason to prevent others from reading and discussing it. Please download the pdf and take a look, Adolfo is happy to answer any questions you may have.
This graphic looks at the angle Earth’s axis makes to the ecliptic and reconciles it against the electrical and gravitational forces.
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
ThanksTallbloke for introducing my theory. We have arrived at this conclusion after acknowledging that ALL PHYSICAL CONSTANTS, are ratios and every ratio it is a ratio between two charges, and when reduced to unity (i.e.: gravity 9.81 Nm thus becomes 0.981x 10 Nm) can be expressed by the sum of Sin Y + Cos Y, which represent the Field as a whole; while really being variables. Thus, we may generalize Max Plank´s Equation:
E= (sin y+Cos y)(C/lambda) x 10.
So it happens with earth´s gravity, being the sin of 78.5°=.981, it shows that it applies at this angle on both hemispheres and where the difference to 90° is precisely the angle (11.5° x 2=23°) at which is inclined its axis on the ecliptic. Thus, earth´s total field, or any other particle total field, is directly proportional to its velocity around its axis (C) and inversely proportional to relative to its “wavelength”, in this case the earth´s diameter.
I have published a more detailed version at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40492538/Unified-Field-Explained-7
Thanks,
For the sake of clarity I have added a few more notes and a graph.:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40514613/Unified-Field-Explained-8
My desire is that these principles could be investigated, applied and proved, in all fields possible.
Hi Adolfo,
Have you tried applying the theory to the tilt of other planets yet?
tallbloke says:
October 31, 2010 at 6:57 am Have you tried applying the theory to the tilt of other planets yet?
No, because it is more important for me and everyone to realize what this Unified Field means:
When the two polar forces oppose, at sin 0°=0, and Cos 180°= -1 ,
the resultant field is 100% an EMISSION FIELD.
When the two polar forces oppose at an angle of 90°, the resultant field is a MAGNETIC FIELD/ ELECTRICAL FIELD
When the two polar forces approach Sin 90°=1 and Cos 90°=0 both vectors add, changing direction 180°, thus the resultant force will oppose the emission field and it is called Gravity
In other words, what the Unfied Field means, if we look at it as an electric current, is that everything can be described as an alternate current (sin y + cos y), and when these forces approach each other, having a small angle of “phase” between them, MASS, GRAVITY appears ins the scene:
Think for example of two IONS, one cation and one anion: When at a ionized state,in the extreme, they are pure charges of PLASMA, then, when being at the Gaseous state, they are like any gas, like vapour in the atmosphere, then, again, when losing part of its energy, they become they reach the liquid state, wheren when being at a too alkaline or too acid pH they keep apart in a solution, until the “alchemical marriage” is reached, close to neutral pH, and then, then they, really, became MASS, i.e. a new body, be it a salt or a planet, it is the same.
Really they are many of your blog´s readers much more intelligent and educated than me to do whatever extrapolations, which I hope will be “useful”, in its widest meaning.
I have not discovered anything, it was out there all the time, before our eyes: Generations after generations, all symbols transmited through history wanted us to understand it and we did not. Even the great Shake-spear chose his artistic name to show it to us and we did not get it.
It can be said, among the many analogies, that the forgotten “Verbum Dismissum”, the forgotten word, was “electron”, electricity.
I would thank you deeply if you can have the above link updated to the last version of the “Unified Field Explained”:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40514613/Unified-Field-Explained-8
[Reply] Link updated.
What does a Faraday cage do?
It would be really helpful (to me) if someone (who understands the theory) could add a commentary to the presentation (to help people like me understand) and post in up on YouTube… Thank you (whoever you are).
PS:
Another paper I read argued that Gravity resulted from two opposing forces… Adolfo seems to have taken this concept many steps forward… so I would REALLY like to understand this fully!
Test it in a lab. Though there are hundreds of power plants which transform gravity into power.
Please explain your thoughts more fully. I take it you are referring to hydro-electric plants which generate power from the gravitational potential of water. It’s not obvious to me, and maybe others, how you get from there to your diagrams showing vectors of gravity and electricity. The two forms of energy are interconvertible, with losses, but how is the equivalence or ratio in terms of quantities found?
You more intelligent and more educated people have the means to prove it, though, what is it an explosion, where, atoms, molecules and particles have the sudden “wish” to fly away: It the way we think and observe phenomena; it´s the same in the case I mentioned here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38598073/Unified-Field
Of bulk densities of a chemical compound, as requested by clients!: They never knew they were asking for a chemical compound where its particles repel one another more (have less subjected to gravity each one) in order to occupy the same volume (space).
As someone told me: “You are going to invent antigravity!: No!, simply because it was invented hundreds of years ago by Mongoflier in France (his hot air balloon), or rather thousand of years ago by the Chinese´s rockets.
Gravity varies, as anyone can see it using Ipod or any other gadgets having an acceleration detector (that thing which enables screen´s image turning around):
http://scienceblogs.com/dotphysics/2010/04/review_of_some_iphone_accelera.php
You may have it one, in order not to be surprised by a sudden gravity change, which afterwards appears in the news: “Big earthquake hits….”
BTW all these sudden changes in gravity are accompanied by generation of radio waves (electromagnetic):
And last but not the least: Earthquake “lights” (which I witnessed during a 7.9 Richter earthquake):
Now, take into account that in the Unified Field equation its (sin y + cos y) part can be managed…
tallbloke says:
October 31, 2010 at 10:14 pm
… The two forms of energy are interconvertible, with losses, but how is the equivalence or ratio in terms of quantities found?
The ratio it is given by the phase angle between sin y + cos y. It is a very simple thing it happens when, for example, you regulate your microwave oven for more or less power. What does it happen then?… atoms having received more energy change, say, liquid into emission´s field water=vapor; now if you put instead another thing in it….it will work accordingly.
Now, in the case of earth´s gravity it corresponds to a wave having a wavelength equal to the diameter of the earth (in meters) and having a frequency equal to its turning around its axis (in seconds). If you have such an alternate current at a phase angle of 11 degrees (90-79°) you will have a force of 9.81 Nm.
This is the generalization of the electromagnetic theory, simply achieved by making all changes to vary between 0 to 1; i.e. all ratios equal to less than the unity, thus expressing them as the sum of Sin+Cos.
Adolfo,
I am finding that centrifugal energy slows due to planetary slowdown but the gravity does not seem to. In fact it gives the impression of increased gravity.
Adolfo,
What I mean is that gravity seems constant and it is being effected by centrifugal force slowdown.
Center of balance.
In a planet there are more then one. An overall center of balance BUT each individual layer has it’s own center of balance due to the density and mass of the material.
Example: A car has an over all center of balance BUT all the individual materials do as well dependant on the density and mass as to how much energy is stored in motion.
Joe, the centres will coincide unless the material of the layer is not evenly distibiuted about the spin axis (unless the uneven distribution happened to have dynamic balance about the common centre).
Joe Lalonde says:
November 1, 2010 at 2:10 am
We have to remember that gravity is variable, it varies from day to day and from spot to spot. You can check this with your Ipad and an accelerator app.
When the two forces (charges) approach one to the other, become nearer to Sin=1 and Cos=0, every electrician knows that vectors add (really subtract) and change direction (when changing direction of an electric motor). What we are trying to express in the simplest possible way is what is evident for any chemist when begining say with two plasma components as an anion and a cation, both can be taken to the state of solid matter (the MASS not manifested as energy, like in its charged state, but in its ALMOST neutral state – at Sin about 1 and Cos about 0).
It is not difficult to visualize or comprehend if we begin with a proton and an atom of negative charged oxygen: in the end we´ll have Water materialized which we can drink!
The same is with EVERYTHING: This is a general LAW.
We must forget what we learn from kids, what reality is: We were taught: “That is called Water, baby…water, baby”; now after thousand of years we have grown up and we POSITIVELY KNOW that two charges, shining in space as PLASMA, can become Water!….thus, future parents will teach: “Baby, that´s electricity, that can be converted into whatever matter you have around you, baby!”
And, last but not the least, the heaviest Matter, mass, being the most neutralized, contains the MORE energy…so it happens with Uranium, it is filled up to the rim with energy, thus it can be turn BACK into its TWO original forces the easier.
Hope this is not read by inconvenient people 🙂
I am providing you the Unified Field spreadsheet, for you to study it:
http://www.giurfa.com/unified_field.xlsx
Where you can see, among other relations,how when the Sin y is divided by 0.142857 (1/7) it gives pH.
Unified Field Spreadsheet to be found also here:
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0ByBDM7PmQn8fZmI0ZjVmMzYtYjEzNS00ZDc4LWI1M2MtYzYzYzNjMmFmY2I4&sort=name&layout=list&num=50
tallbloke,
But each layer has it’s own density in the case of the layers of a planet.
An overall center of balance that is 2/3 from the axis. This in rotation, makes both side of the rotating mass of equal mass. Rotation changes the center of balance like a car by motion.
The axis is the center of balance in a stationary circle but not a circle in motion.
Aldolfo,
From the creation of the planet until now, there seems to be little difference in gravity but centrfigal force has changed it’s enegy by the planetary slowdown.
Is there a correlation of gravity fluctuations to atmospheric pressure changes?
Is there a pattern to these fluctuations or are they random?
Tallbloke,
What physics and science has failed to do is to look back and find out why this theory or that theory was conceived. What mechanics was involved to achieve their conclusions? The picasso rotating table was a big hit with science.
So, centrifugal force was never figured out. It was then deemed pseudo-science.
Yet they know it is a viable energy.
Joe Lalonde says:
November 2, 2010 at 11:55 am
…What mechanics was involved to achieve their conclusions?
Wave mechanics is the general law (The Law of the Octave), and the laws of Sin and Cosine is what describes it and which is the perfect analogy. Any other description is but euristical and not analogical. Phantom´s physics does not exists but the one which excatly reproduces reality, anything else is purely subjective, it doesn´t matter how complicatedly or obscurely, i.e “intellingently concocted”, it is: Those are but onanistic psychological activities.
Joe, I’ve read some of Miles Mathis stuff. In fact it was my link to his gravitational theory which set Adolfo on his current line of thought. I’m happy to see a reappraisal of old formulae, it’s what good sceptics do. 🙂
tallbloke says:
November 2, 2010 at 9:02 pm
That´s true “Magister Ludi”: He de-united the field and rejected polarity, which is obvious for anyone who is married 🙂 , thus I brought the “alchemical marriage” to scene again. “As above so below” says Hermes Trismegistus:
Hermes, Lord of the World, who lives in our hearts , cycle of the moon , round and square , the inventor of words, language, he who obeys justice, wearing the chlamidę , winged feet, lord of issuing all the sounds of language , prophet of mortals …
tallbloke,
If I had not worked on creating a more efficient turbine, I would not have found all the deficiences we did not understand with understanding how a circle actually works in rotation.
An engineer once stated how proud he was at being able to move a massive turbine blade. I told him to try moving it as he went closer to the axis.
The flow of water energy is constant and the same but the energy to turn a turbine blade is quite different as you move up the radius.
@Tallbloke: Now, let us respectfully answer our Magister Ludi´s question:
-Evidently, almost by definition, the greatest Emission Field in the Solar System it is in the Sun.
-Then, there we are to find the highest enrgies, the higher frequencies and a corresponding the smaller wavelengths.
-If we look at our spreadsheet:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40859196/unified-field-xlsx
We see an vibrational descending octave at C1 B0 (DO-SI), having a wavelength 1050-1110; avg:1,100
-Then we have an interval, a gap, at the Sun´s corona, where it receives energy from the outside.
-Going down we found the equivalent wavelength of the Earth, at F0 (FA, of 1,580
-Then, so: As 12,760 km it is to 1,580, thus 1,100 it is to……: 8,844 kms. The Sun´s core diameter.
Adolfo,
Have you suspected that the Earth’s core could be simular to the suns core?
Would make far more sense than a hunk of iron that really has NO energy of it’s own.
Joe Lalonde says:
November 4, 2010 at 12:15 pm
Perhaps I expressed myself wrongly as I am a spanish speaking person. I meant not the Sun´s CORE, but the Sun solid “planet” or ground.
As for the earth´s or sun´s core , as a SOLENOID , if correctly designed 🙂 , it should be of FERRIITE OR MAGNETITE (Fe2O3 or Fe3O4). As for the geological disposition of layers, the earth´s roughly follows a rational order, being the SIAL (aluminum silicates) the upper known layer, however mixed up because of the anomalous (having as reference the universal harmonic laws) history of the Solar System; its major irregularities being our Moon and the asteroids´orbit: a solar system´s most visible “scar”.
Though, in this respect, it is “better” and self-calming not to wonder about it. ( BTW, it is a story that Discovery, History,etc. all the pathological and thanatophilic media has forgotten to use.
What the Unified Field shows is that any matter, mass is charges neutralized, as much as possible, but not to absolute neutrality or buffering, as it means death. It is easy, and advisable, to think, as chemists realize, that any charges, ions, out there, can be SOLIDIFIED by working on them; for astronomers Hydrogen may seem something like ghosts i the middle of space or, worst, if they “think” in protons, positive charges, which REALLY are HYDROGEN NUCLEII, thus any chemical engineer, much more if he or she is told there are protons somewhere, for them these are “raw materials” for their industrial processes. So ANYTHING: I never forgot when in the 1950’s I saw in Popular Mechanics´Magaziine a photography of silvery/black colored SOLID METALLIC HYDROGEN.
Now, I gues after 1960´s drugs abuse and Huxley´s “Dooor to Perception” “Post Normal Science” has lost sight of actual reality, (which, btw, it has not happened in Russia or China, but in Europe, America and influenced by them countries, just by following “fashion”, self-conceit, mutual caressing, and self-indulging).
@Joe Lalonde :
It´s a fact for me that, looking the other way around: The Thermosphere is Earth´s Corona: And we are not being burnt up by its 2500°C temperature. As the Unified Field shows, it is possible to evolve as to produce MORE high energy levels: We already have, as less “solid” or more ionized than solid matter (mass): the oceans (can imagine what a lot of nergy in it?, the atmosphere (with its zillions of tons of charged water in it), the stratosphere, the thermosphere, the electromagnetosphere, etc., and it ha been proved that we are already producing X-rays from our lightnings and sprites.
Thus we could consider the abnormal obsessions of global warmers/climate changers are in line with the thoughts (if they have some) of cancer cells in a body to be killed by the power drive of some cells turned mad.
Adolfo,
Here is where science doesn’t quite make sense when the surface of the planet is iron.
We know the core is solid through seismic readings but so is the suns core showing as solid. Yet someone said they picked up iron radicals from the core going through an iron planet. ( Was it not a seismologist?) If so then it is only a theory again.
Now if this was hydrogen like the suns core the process would make far more sense in that the energy is produced by the core.
Centrifugal force does not allow heavy materials near the core at high rates of speed.
@ Joe Lalonde says:
November 5, 2010 at 11:52 am
The Sun’s power comes from the outside and this energy adds at the first gap, at the corona. The Birkeland current (sin+cos, alternate current) which comes from the center of the local galaxy adds to the Sun’s own octave, or, again, alternate current, Birkeland current, sin+cos which way back gave it birth. When that happened, and every time, as the Unified Field theory show, two charges approach mass (gravity) is solidified, that accretion process goes from the lighter elements to the heavier elements. The rest of the field then evolves against gravity, building an atmosphere (part of the emission field),etc,etc,. If enough evolved then it can RESONATE with higher energies, at a GAP. That Gap over the Sun is at its corona, where it can reinforce and produce another current of its own: Our planetary system.
However, everything can be expressed by the interplay, at different angles, of those two opposite forces, of those opposite alternate currents (one with the negative phase ahead, the other with the positive phase ahead).
I would sincerely expect this theory be analyzed and TESTED at the lab by electrical engineers and tested and proved in the lab in ANY field of engineering. I don’t expect shamans (new age physics) to pay attention to it as the majority of them are submerged in the world of Shamanism and Voodoo.
Adolfo,
I too know EXACTLY what you mean in analyzing and testing.
I went into the mechanics end of motion and can prove how to compress mass and gases, change their densities and store and release energy through motion.
Religion certainly doesn’t help when they look for heads that do not agree with them.
Considering almost all governments have leaders that are religious.
@ Joe Lalonde says:
November 5, 2010 at 5:37 pm
It’s a matter of concepts: We do not currently know that in every Power Plant Gravity is turned into power and when it arrives at our home kitchen we can turn it into gravity again: To make a juice in our blender. Nevertheless I would expect more sophisticated tests to be run by other people, like changing the alternate current phase angle to have the results shown by the Unified Field.
Adolfo,
I must apologize for my misconception of the suns composition. Old school says sun is hydrogen filled.
I did a presentation to a hydro-electric company one on angles of deflection off of a turbine in motion. This shows more energy was being deflected in front of each other to the actual straight energy touching the blades.
I also showed the deficiency of the blade itself in a rotational circle as it takes more energy to push the blades as you go to the axis.
I hope the morons controlling science will listen to advanced science for both of our cases.
Joe Lalonde says:
November 5, 2010 at 8:57 pm
Meanwhile let’s buy more popcorn! 🙂
Adolfo,
Recommend a good movie to go with the popcorn?
I have to admit that rejection and being ignored spurred me to go as far as I did and to be absolutely, 100% correct.
Adolfo, thank you and congratulations on your theory which gives a mathematical description of the ratio between the forces of electromagnetism and gravity. A lot of amazing people are thinking in the direction of gravity being a manifestation of the electrical force, and you are one 🙂
The discoveries and applications for this are going to be incredible, for life and technology. But you are right, other countries which don’t have such an emotional or sentimental attachment to old theories and Einstein will be first to accept and use electric gravity.
And thanks tallbloke for this post. A toast! (Just coffee, it’s early)
@Zeke the Sneak says:
November 6, 2010 at 4:39 pm
Thanks Zeke for your words: You have really sneaked in knowledge, that attitude was called “Gnosis”, which,btw, was declared a heresy by the Council Of Nicea, in the year 325 A.D, really because knowledge does not go well with power, as the ones who want to govern upon people always like people to be ignorant, not knowing the truth, so they teach them “Agnosticism”: You are not supposed to know, there is nothing you need to know, all what you need to know it is our “Dogmas”. Does it sound familiar?
Well, that´s what he modern “sages” tell us: You have to believe in our “Black Holes”,in our “Multiple dimensions”, etc.,etc.
The first fallacious concept was “inmateriality”….then how do you handle a ghost?, worst if they want us to believe in an whole army of ghosts! 🙂
ANOTHER WAY TO PROVE ‘UNIFIED FIELD”:
Number 7 IT IS NOT A “MYSTIC” NUMBER, 1/7=0.142857
Divide Sin y (between 0 and 90 degrees) /0.142857 and you will get pH ! at the correspondent angle (the same angle at which ANION and CATION actually ARE at that pH in the solution).
See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/40514613/Unified-Field-Explained-8
There is no MYSTICS behind, but lack of knowledge.
After you get knowledge we’ll talk about mysticism 🙂
Say: If Coke, for example, is at pH=3,5, the 3.5 x 0.142857=0.4999995 and Asin (0.4999995) = 30 degrees. This means that the buffer components in coke are at an angle of 60 degrees.
That’s why I invite you all to play with the “Unified Field”
And Joe Lalonde’ s turbine blades are the projection on a blueprint of Sin+Cos curves.
are at an angle of 60 degrees. Errata: AT 120 degrees.
An article which follows the concept of the Unified Field:
http://daltonsminima.altervista.org/?p=12129&cpage=1#comment-33976
Adolfo,
Excellent!
I’m glad I could help!
Joe
Dear Tallbloke:
I have a new version of THE UNIFIED FIELD EXPLAINED:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/42018959/Unified-Field-Explained-9
It will like you. It has reached its latest dimension, finally.
Thanks for the most recent UF doc, it is the best one yet.
You say, “When the two polar forces approach Sin 90deg= 1 and Cos 90deg= 0, both vectors add, changing direction 180 deg, thus the resultant force will oppose the emission field, and it is called Gravity.”
It is above my ability to see why the vectors add and change direction. But in your presentation you applied it to water molecules, pH, sound frequencies and planets, and I believe I could see what you were saying best when applied to Phi (growth, galaxies, water at the beach 😀
and beauty).
Quite enjoyed the thoughts in the UF doc
Zeke the Sneak says:
November 11, 2010 at 8:58 pm
That change of direction it is obvious when making react two, until then dissolved ions, they just fall down, “precipitate”. In the case of the Solar System the accretion process followed the same rule, it began as plasma making of the elements and then falling following the logarithmic (Fibonacci) spiral. Wherever there is such accretions it is obvious gravity appears more conspicuously. It also corresponds when changing polarities or turning sense to an electric motor.
I will be waiting for your playing (extrapolating or testing) the UF, not only you but all friends around. (Avoid, of course, dangerous ways) 🙂
Perhaps the two polar forces, pain and joy, approach and both vectors add, changing direction and giving new growth, if we do not fight it.
Zeke the Sneak says:
November 11, 2010 at 9:45 pm
I forgot to tell that both forces really do not reach 90°, as you see in the graph at the beginning of this post; they do not close, when they really get it, it happens the same that happens when you connect two power wires: A short circuit happens: That´s what “Dr. S” sees as his “reconnection” blowing out. In the case of a human being, when blood pH approaches one of its two limit values, the heart stops either at systole or at diastole…but not only death happens when two forces approach: You know than a brand new “Birkeland” current can start, a brand new “logarithmic spiral” begins: It begins making noises after 9 months…..
Download last version:
Click to access unified_field_explained_9.pdf
Just to clarify:
What the Unfied Field says is that “EVERYTHING IS ELECTRIC AND EVERY PHENOMENON IN NATURE IS AN ALTERNATE CURRENT”…..AT DIFFERENT PHASE ANGLES BETWEEN THE TWO OPPOSITE FORCES
@tallbloke says:
October 31, 2010 at 6:57 am
The Earth it is a peculiar case as it has a too big and too near satellite, which has a negative EM field, which subtracts the earth´s (interpreted as “tides”), and varying from
-3.78 Nm (perigee) to -6.78 (apogee).