Reposted from http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/15-06-2011/118207-volcanoes-0/
Mass awakening of volcanoes in the recent years has made scientists wreck their brains over the possible causes of such increased activity. Many geophysicists believe that such activity may increase because of the interaction of the Earth with other celestial bodies, such as the Sun or the giant planets Saturn and Jupiter.
Even the skeptics do not doubt that our planet is going through a peak of volcanic activity. Indeed, for the second consecutive year, these fire-breathing monsters are being felt in different regions of the planet. Even seemingly forever dormant volcanoes are coming to life. In addition, scientists expect the emergence of new volcanoes in places where they did not exist before.
The peak of volcanic activity also coincided with the activation of other processes in Earth’s crust that resulted in the succession of powerful earthquakes. Although they happened in places with the increased seismic activity, this is not very comforting. Since volcanoes and earthquakes are usually associated with one another, it becomes clear that something is happening to the planet.
First we need to figure out what hidden mechanism causes a volcanic eruption. Scientists have known for a long time that mantle convection causes volcano eruptions. However, this knowledge does not answer the question why at one time volcanoes are active, and in other times dormant.The ancient Greeks answered this question without any hesitation – the volcano wakes up when the god Hephaestus, the blacksmith, gets rush defense orders from Zeus (or some other deity). Then he descends into his underground forge under a mountain, kindles the hearth, and gets to work. As a result, people have to “admire” the smoke rising from the underground oven, splashing hot metal and sparks flying from under the hammer of Cyclops. Hellenes were convinced that the volcano wakes up just when Zeus needs something from Hephaestus.
Contemporary scholars are not happy with such an explanation. However, it is interesting that the theories attempting to explain the sudden awakening of the volcanic activity have certain references to the king of gods.
Now, scientists often say that the volcanism is a process that can be activated not only by Earth, but also space reasons, and, more precisely, the interaction of the planet with different objects from space. In the late 19th century geologist E. Kluge and his colleagues noticed a rhythmic nature of the eruptions. According to their observations, volcanoes do not wake up “suddenly” and there is certain regularity to this process. That is, it makes sense to talk about certain cycles of volcanic activity.
In the early twentieth century, Professor Bogolepov drew attention to another interesting fact – a wave of volcanic activity is particularly pronounced in the equatorial zone. This interested the scientist, and he gathered a curious collection of evidence showing that volcanic activity in most cases was linked to the general geophysical perturbations on the planet associated with the impact of any large celestial body. In the 1970’s and 1980’s, scientists calculated that the peaks of activity often coincide with the periods of the excited state of the sun (often called “flares”).
In our time, researcher Fedorov showed that the distribution of volcanoes is subject to strict latitudinal zonation (i.e., fire-breathing mountains are located strictly at certain latitudes), and their behavior is determined by the influence of gravitational fields of the Sun and the Moon. In addition, the work of Vladimir Shirokov allowed establishing the dependence between major volcanic eruptions and bursts of solar activity. Khain and Khalilov noticed that the reaction of the volcanoes in rift zones (areas where the mantle material is released to the surface, located on the ocean floor) and on continental margins is the opposite – if one falls asleep, another one wakes up. Most interestingly, it is also tied to the cycles of solar activity.
All this suggests that volcanoes are often highly sensitive to any external disturbances which arise as a result of solar activity, as well as the activity of other stars and even planets. Statistics, taking into account the terms of the beginning of eruptions in the period from 1960 to 2009 suggests that, apparently, the very rotation of the sun around its axis (and, judging by the observations of sunspots, this period is approximately 27 days) generates a short-period fluctuations in volcanic activity. It is interesting that most of this activity occurs in one or two days before the passage of the central meridian of the Sun.
However, volcanic activity can be extinguished in the interaction of the planet with the gas giants Saturn and Jupiter. It was observed that these planets at the time of passage of perihelion (the closest to the center of the solar point of the orbit of a celestial body), they flew past the Earth, slowing the movement of magma in its depths. This, in turn, leads to a decrease in the number of eruptions. For example, it was found that Saturn, being at perihelion, reduces their number from 25-26 to 22 per year. Jupiter slows volcanic activity more effectively (which is not surprising, as it is closer to Earth).
The Sun activates volcanoes, and giant planets inhibit their activity. Interestingly, the Greeks, apparently, were mistaken – the real Zeus (i.e., Jupiter) is not really rushing Hephaestus, but ordering him to slow down.
For the volcanic and other natural processes, the dynamics of the barycenter (i.e., center of the mass) of the solar system is very important. It is known to be normally located approximately a million miles from the center of the Sun, but due to the reversal of the giant planets it has to move constantly from its normal position to its outer layers, and then come back. Calculations showed that such rhythms of the barycenter are cyclical and each cycle lasts for 179 years.
The maximum volcanic activity is observed just when the centroid passes through perihelion and aphelion. The perihelion here means the point when the barycenter is as close to the center of the Sun as possible, and the aphelion is the point of the maximum distance from the Sun. According to the data on the eruptions which occurred during the period from 1800 through 2009, in such critical moments for the barycenter the volcanic activity is always much stronger. Indeed, without exception, all the largest eruptions (like the explosion of the volcano Krakatoa in 1883) occurred at the time when the barycenter either moves away from the center of the Sun or approaches it.
The shifts of the barycenter are caused either by the approximation of a giant planet to the Sun or it moving away from it. It turns out that Jupiter and Saturn in this case, on the contrary, contribute to the increased volcanic activity. So, as you can see, the interaction of Zeus and Hephaestus is twofold – the king of the gods can give the latter orders either to slow down or hurry up. Also, apparently, the displacement of the barycenter may also be affected by the movement of the other two gas giants, Uranus and Neptune. However, scientists do not know much about this.
The volcanic activity is dependent on many factors. At the same time, scientists cannot exactly tell whether all of these interactions affect it, because to this day they are unable to observe the processes in the mantle and core. It turns out that the mechanism is revealed from one side only, and the other side is still hidden from scholars.
However, in the absence of a clarification of the specific dependence of mantle and nuclear processes on external influences, it cannot be argued that they affect volcanic activity. After all, this may be a mere coincidence (as both in science and in life it is, unfortunately, often the case). Therefore, scientists should always check all the facts in isolation and not be limited to observation of their correlation as this correlation may only be a wishful thinking.
However, now one thing is clear – the god Hephaestus gets plenty of orders not only from Zeus, but from his other colleagues as well, and they are all urgent. It seems that he is doing his best to fulfill them.
Anton Yevseev
Pravda.Ru
H/T to WUWT contributor ‘Scarlet Pumpernickel’







http://hraun.vedur.is/ja/englishweb/myrjokull.html
Mýrdalsjökull- big brother of the Eyjafjallajökull which grounded planes across Europe last year, is quivering.
“Scientists have known for a long time that mantle convection causes volcano eruptions. However, this knowledge does not answer the question why at one time volcanoes are active, and in other times dormant.”
It might if solar and planetary gravitational influences modulate mantle convection.
@Roger Andrews
An image worth of a thousand shortcircuits… 🙂
http://weheartit.com/entry/10679249
“As above so below”: From an electric universe point of view, the Earth is a small charged body moving in a large cell of plasma. Because of this, explanations of all physical phenomena in, on, and near the Earth must take the electrical behavior of plasma into account. The Physics of the Plasma Universe by Anthony Peratt describes magma as a plasma, a medium containing moving charges. So we should expect volcanoes not only to exhibit electrical behavior but to have that behavior connected with the larger plasma environment, that is, to be elements in a larger electrical circuit. .
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050131volcaniclightning.htm
Or is it the God Vulcan?
It is just after full moon. I’ve been keeping an eye on Iceland for quite a while and the swarms of quakes do tend to wax and wane with the lunar cycle. Since there’s just been an eclipse too, any effect would be strpnger than in some cycles. I’m not worrying just yet.
Adolfo, Hephaestus according to our Russian journo.
Verity, thanks, I’m trying to decide whether to splash the cash on a flight to Krakownext month for my lady’s birthday treat. When we tried to get there via Oslo last year, the Icelandic volcanic cloud defeated us.
Just like expected http://virakkraft.com/moon-volcano-temp.png http://virakkraft.com/volcano-mooncycle.png
Last 36 hours…No moon….I think Corona hole !
Synchro

Papua(Karkar) M5.1
Chile
(Macizo de Pacuni,Guallatiri,Acotango,Sajama, Nevado del Casiri, Nevados,Parinacota
Tacora,Taapacá,Patilla Pata,Anallajsi, Nevado,Lexone) M5.1
Italy
(Vulcano) M3.1
iceland
(Katla+Prestahnukur) M3.3
Nippon
(Hiuchi,Nikko-Shirane,Nantai,Omanago Group,Numazawa,Azuma,Takahara,Bandai,AdataraNasu) M4.6
Papua
(Ulawun,Lolo,Pago,Bamus,Hargy,Walo) M5.0
Alaska
(Kiska,Semisopochnoi,Segula,Davidof,Little Sitkin) M3.9
Indonesia
(Toba,Imun,Helatoba-Tarutung,Lubukraya,Sibualbuali) M5.0
Guatemala
(Agua,Acatenango,Fuego,Almolonga,Santa Maria,Tolimán,Atitlán
Santo Tomás) M4.8
Taiwan
(Névtelen,Tatun Group,Kueishantao) M4.5
South Sandwich Islands
(Leskov Island,Hodson,Protector Shoal,Zavodovski) M5.5
Indonesia nord e sud -Sumatra-
(Peuet Sague,GeureudongKerinci,Belirang-Beriti,Pendan,Hutapanjang
Kunyit,Sumbing) n°2 M4.7
http://www.solen.info/solar/coronal_holes.html
CH456 northern 2011.06.16 2/2/9 496
CH455 southern 2011.06.14-2011.06.15 2/3/18 556
CH454 northern 2011.06.12-2011.06.13 2/3/18 519
CH453 trans equatorial 2011.06.07-2011.06.08 3/5/39 618
and n°2 partial CME
2011-06-07 ———-> 2011-06-16
“corona hole” connected “area of volcanoes”
@tallbloke says:
I would advice you, instead, going south to “Puerto Varas” City, next to Yanquigue lake and Puerto Montt, Chile, where both of you could climb to the top of the Osorno Volcano, comfortably seated on a cable way ( something I dared to do, being 67 years old then and with my wife). Osorno volcano it is in the same chain of mountains as the Puyehue, which is currently erupting and the Chaiten volcano (which erupted in 2008). You will be safer there, as winds go eastward, so you will be able to easily land at the Puerto Montt airport, 30 minutes away.
@Michele: Once again your link seems to be blocked!!. Good to know you correlation with “coronal holes”.
@ Adolfo
The link is not blocked…
replacement..
http://daltonsminima.altervista.org/?page_id=9506&cpage=211#comment-51556
Rudolf Stainer Says :
” In the inner earth is there a Jupiter ! “
@Michele: …un Jupiter tuono…(a thundering Jupiter…)
Hello.
Contradictory to what article says, I think that past time volcanic erruptions ARE caused by Jupiter and Saturn directly:
It seems probable (from past few years, but deserves a better analysis…), that the last oppositions (geocentric) of Jupiter and Saturn arround 1990 caused Mt. Pinatubo erruption (largest in past years) and now arround 2010 another one serie caused these current erruptions (including earthquakes in Haiti and Japan etc)…
(and other examples may include 1453, 1912 etc… but there are other examples NOT supporting this theory… also there are examples of these oppositions influencing human society, which would not interest physicists much…)
Anyway, there really seems to be a long-term link between close distance of Sun-SSB (which is caused mainly by Jupiter-Saturn opposition also – but the Heliocentric one) with volcanic activity, as the article says… Which seems to me to be linked to a SSB (Solar System Barycenter) passing through the space curvature of Sun’s gravity, changing the geometry of the Solar system (and angular momentum conservation!), yielding in some energy release and dissipating into some non-smooth changes in planet trajectories…
Hi Semi,
I think you are correct. I remember contributor ‘lgl’ made graph a few years ago of the volcanic index against the Saturn-Jupiter heliocentric oppositions and conjunctions and it looked like there was a non-random link with the oppositions.
… and I’ve noted this idea here on this forum/discussion a year ago here:
(August 5, 2010 at 11:20 am)
I’ve not got any much time to work on these analyses now, I’m sorry…
Semi, I wish you well with your work. Please tell us when the next paper is published and let me write about it here.
I will add the Saturn-Jupiter oppositions to the plot’s on that post to see if anything of interest happens. A plot of general energy release from volcanos of all magnitudes would be more useful I think.
Some mention was made above about 27 day solar cycle and peak of activity, the North South declination of the Moon are in phase with the magnetic rotation of the sun. Every time the Moon is at its maximum North extension from the equator, there is an active (at least one the most active lot of the cycle) sunspot group in middle of the Northern hemisphere of the sun. As the moon crosses the equator either way the two limbs of the sun are the most active, and around Maximum south the spots appear in the middle of the southern hemisphere of the sun.
The eruptions in Iceland seem to be when one of the outer planets passes and the moon goes maximum North at about the same time. The southern volcanoes seem to go off as the moon is at maximum South culmination, the prediction process needs to consider the declinational earth tides, solar wind magnetic activity, and Earths synod conjunctions with the outer planets, as well as the perigee/apogee modulation for the moon and the perihelion and aphelion of the major planets.
From my past examinations of quake generation patterns show that the East/West fault lines that run across the Mediterranean area have peaks of activity when the moon is close to the equator, and Japan was most active when the moon was close to maximum declination from 18 to 23 degrees and in syzerzy with the sun.
As the total number of indices increases so do the chances of more or larger eruptions and Quakes. It just happens that the changes in the ion charges on air masses, that give rise to extreme weather events is in phase with these effects as well.
In Greek mythology whenever there was to be a war in the heavens, Mars had to go see Jupiter to get permission to attack or get support for the fight, seems that the addition of a mars synod conjunction with the synod conjunction with Jupiter, adds a focus point for the sparital/temporal timing for the intensification of the severe weather effects.
When the simultaneous synod conjunction of Mars and Jupiter last happened a large arctic cold air mass made the transit from western Canada all the way to the Southwestern us in three days and killed saguaro cactus hundreds of years old. Not to mention the loss of most strawberries and other landscaping problems in California.
Richard that is fascinating. Does the lunar culmination point always coincide with solar rotation? Permanently? How could they be synchronised??
I remember Vukcevic has a graph showing an anomalous area of the Sun which is always more active. Could solar wind fluctuation have forced the Moon into an orbit such that the timing of it’s culmination is locked to solar rotation?
We are told the orbit of the Moon is growing as its tidal effect on the Earth slows the Earth’s rotation. That would alter the period of the Moon’s orbit too wouldn’t it? Are we at a ‘special’ moment in the evolution of the Earth-Moon relationship where the Moon has this resonance with the Sun?
By the way, Happy Solstice to you and everyone. 🙂
Excellent observation Richard, which once again illustrates the connectedness of the solar system and how events external to Earth have a massive effect on weather/climate.
I agree with Rog that the moons regular pendulum like N>S transit is driven by events on the sun, but perhaps the underlying force is Miles Mathis photon bombardment field. This same EM field (from both sun and Earth) is also responsible for maintaining the moon at an exact orbital distance so that both have the same optical size when viewed from Earth. No coincidences here, the solar system behaves as a single body!
No time for another astrophysical Work now – just a note:
The explanation, HOW a close distance of Solar System Barycenter to the center of Sun causes Earthquakes (and other-planet quakes) :
The main conserved property of the isolated Solar System is the sum of angular momentum of its bodies. Angular momentum is a vector variable and depends on a mass of a body, on it’s speed and distance from the system center. The bodies can exchange angular momentum by gravitational or other attraction, but the sum – relative to the barycenter of the system – is constant. It can also convert to another form of energy and dissipate.
Now consider, that the barycenter gets close to the more-curved spacetime near the center of the Sun (not necessarily “just below surface”): the distance of ALL planets from the barycenter increases suddenly and they ALL gain some Angular momentum, which then needs to dissipate somewhere to maintain the constancy of energy. When the barycenter starts to retract from the curved space-time, the opposite happens – the planets suddenly loose the kinetic energy… This creates an “excited” state of the planetary system – while the Earthquakes and volcanic erruptions can happen any other time also, they are just more probable to break out in that excited state…
I just don’t have got an explanation, how body-centric opposition might work (IFF there were some gravitons, we could feel their central stream differently? but there are no gravitons…) – but also the plants “feel” the planetary oppositions (confirmed by some 30-50 years of field experiments made by Maria Thun and her group in Germany)… Some kind of gravitational field interference ???
Another note – how do they measure, how plants feel the planets: the plants, seeded on 10 consecutive days, give consistently different yields of crops (measurable by crop weight per square meter of ground), when seeded or “treated” on days of planetary oppositions (they are publishing their results and charts in the bio-dynamic calendary showing this trend…)
The plants mainly feel the Moon – when the moon is rising to higher altitudes (not the daily movement, but the monthly one), the “juices” in the plants drive more into upper parts of plants and when the moon sinks to lower circles on the sky, the “juices” in the plants drive more into roots and the difference of “crop yields”, when the plants are re-rooted (transplanted,replanted) on times of down-driving Moon are also measurable and systematically different from when the plants are re-rooted at the times, when the moon is up-driving (which is usually a better time for crop harvesting)…
Semi says:
June 22, 2011 at 12:08 am
“…The plants mainly feel the Moon…
All life ‘feels the moon’. For plants which crop above ground, need to sow on a waxing moon and vice versa for root crops. Several theories regarding tidal effects causing changes to water table and associated nutrient release from subsoil – some theories about the effects of telluric currents stimulating seed germination and sprouting of tubers. None very convincing, although the method does seem to work. Perhaps the unrecognised but ubiquitous charge field at work?
Regarding moon orbit I came across this by Lorenzo Lorio, Cornell Uni, Apr 2011 – “On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon”…
“A recent analysis of a Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data record spanning 38.7 yr revealed an anomalous increase of the eccentricity of the lunar orbit amounting to de/dt_meas = (9 +/- 3) 10^-12 yr^-1. The present-day models of the dissipative phenomena occurring in the interiors of both the Earth and the Moon are not able to explain it. We examine several dynamical effects, not modeled in the data analysis, in the framework of long-range modified models of gravity and of the standard Newtonian/Einsteinian paradigm. It turns out that none of them can accommodate de/dt_meas. Many of them do not even induce long-term changes in e; other models do, instead, yield such an effect, but the resulting magnitudes are in disagreement with de/dt_meas. In particular, the general relativistic gravitomagnetic acceleration of the Moon due to the Earth’s angular momentum has the right order of magnitude, but the resulting Lense-Thirring secular effect for the eccentricity vanishes. A potentially viable Newtonian candidate would be a trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche) since it, actually, would affect e with a non-vanishing long-term variation. On the other hand, the values for the physical and orbital parameters of such a hypothetical body required to obtain the right order of magnitude for de/dt are completely unrealistic. Moreover, they are in neat disagreement with both the most recent theoretical scenarios envisaging the existence of a distant, planetary-sized body and with the model-independent constraints on them dynamically inferred from planetary motions. Thus, the issue of finding a satisfactorily explanation for the anomalous behavior of the Moon’s eccentricity remains open.”
So perhaps not Planet X, but the work of EM charge field revealed again?
Tenuc: Regarding moon orbit I came across this by Lorenzo Lorio…
Thank you – great catch…
I think I am becoming a lunatic…. although others say I have been for a long time 🙂
Many of my dig here researches into climate and weather involve a lunar connection…
Many of my dig here researches into earthquakes and volcanoes involve a lunar connection…
Many of my dig here researches into the EM field and the solar system involve lunar examples…
My perspective is that the moon is the only really tangible heavenly body that we can study and quantify…
With the sun and planets so much more is guesswork and blind faith belief system…
So give me the moon any day… it seems to give us our best chance to observe, theorise and progress…
This is especially true regarding the EM field and the work of Miles Mathis…
And I think that the work of Lorenzo Lorio just underlines that point…
But my point is really a rant:
I find it hard to believe that the so called great thinkers of our day can spend their time developing incredible Big Bang theories when they can’t even explain what is happening on their doorstep… it is just like climate and weather… they can’t produce a reliable three day weather forecast but they expect us to believe in their hundred year climate forecast… talk about scientific dead-ends and deflections… so bring it on Miles Mathis and the EM field… so bring it on the Electric Universe… so bring it on Tallbloke and your contributors, commentators and readers.
Thanks for another great posting.
http://research.aerology.com/aerology-analog-weather-forecasting-method/
the following quote has been posted on site since March 11, 2010
Much more detail on the modification of ionic charges on the tidal effects, later in the same post, this is the basics of what i have been on about since 1994… http://research.aerology.com/original-november-1994-hypothesis/
The Science
Our Atmosphere and its Natural Cyclic Patterns
Textbooks that teach about atmospheric circulation discuss the effects of ocean tides, and suggest that in an “unbounded ocean” you wouldn’t see the height changes that are due to the tidal bulge inertia running up the slope of the shore boundary.
Since the atmosphere is mostly unbounded, except by mountain ranges, you should mostly see the turbulence generated, and our atmosphere shows a lot of turbulence suggesting that tidal effects are in play.
With the advent of weather satellite photo coverage, I began to see the patterns in the atmospheric turbulence. I started to investigate the natural cyclic patterns in the solar system, to see if there might be something useful that has been over looked.
So, I started to look at the periods in the orbital dynamics of the Earth / Moon system and its common barycenter. I thought that maybe they were in harmonic oscillation, with the Moon being magnetically driven by the cyclic flux carried in the solar wind — shifting as the Sun rotated. The magnetic poles of the Sun are tilted ~12 degrees from the rotational axis of the sun, with a rotational period of about 27.32 days, the same period as the declinational movement of the moon. I found there was no known reason, why the Moon had a declinational component to its orbit. Upon further investigation I saw that the two periods were synchronized to with in a couple of minutes as far back as the Naval Office Ephemeris records go.
The long-term patterns found by Milankovitch and Theodor Landscheidt have their basis in natural periods of the movement of the Galaxy and the Solar System within it. The effects of the movement of the Sun about the Solar System barycenter is key to this process. The driving effects of the shorter periods of natural climate variability are being overlooked. Current meteorology is too focused on the surface of the Earth to get answers that work for the long term forecasting of weather and climate.
The solar wind inductive effects, drive the lunar declinational movement, which in turn drives the atmospheric declinational tides. The declinational movement of the Moon hangs at the culmination almost three days, as the polarity of the solar wind peaks and reverses. This produces the surges in the meridional flow, visible in the satellite photos as turbulence.
The earth moon system by being a two body set of orbital dynamics allows for much more flexibility, the moon runs above and below the ecliptic plane in the same cycle time as it runs above and below the equator, in the “A big picture of the solar system” I detailed how the change in the magnetic axis tilt of the sun, effectively drives the lunar declination off of the ecliptic, and went on about how the shift in the magnetic axis of the sun to be in line with its axis of rotation would effectively stop the pulsations of N?S driving of the lunar declination relative to the ecliptic plane and leave it in alignment with the Sun/Earth/moon so there would be an eclipse at every full or new moon, and the tidal effects of the sun and moon coupled in phase all of the time instead of the interaction as is now between the two separate tidal bulges, coming in and out of phase producing the chaos in the jet stream patterns.
IF during the glacial episodes the spin axis and the magnetic axis of the sun were the same, then we would be in a permanent La nina global circulation with a constant standing pattern of blocking highs, that would push equatorial air masses up into the polar regions, giving rise to the massive snowfalls needed on the lee side of the Rockies to start ice sheets.
With the continual pushing of the equatorial heat and moisture toward the poles until the solar system made a close enough approach to a spiral arm of the galaxy, that the magnet poles of the sun were pulled out of alignment with the axis of rotation. And the interglacial period starts up again as the moon gets pulled off of the ecliptic plane killing the constant pumping action by the introduction of the resultant turbulence generated into the jet stream clashes, that end up in much more zonal flow around both poles blocking the heat loss out from the poles and allowing the earth to warm up again.
The younger Dryas event may have been a false start up of the lunar declination off of the ecliptic plane, from a short pulse of magnetic solar axis shift that reversed then went back to off axis agin and has stayed there due to the orientation of the magnetic fields steered by the local galactic magnetic fields shifted by the dynamics of the propagation patterns as they cut thru the spiral arm density and radiative pressure effects.
Richard, mea culpa. I’ve been so busy with my own stuff that I neglected reading yours thoroughly. Thanks for the praisee, and i hope this encourages more people to read your pages on the site. A really interesting hypothesis regarding ice ages. More convincing than Nir Shaviv’s galactic Svensmark effect in a lot of ways.
Richard Holle: The earth moon system by being a two body set of orbital dynamics allows for much more flexibility
Amazing…
The penny finally dropped last week regarding the two body set of orbital dynamics…

and I immediately thought of Watt’s centrifugal steam engine governor:
So now I am looking at the Earth-Moon system as a centrifugal electromagnetic governor driven by the Sun…
Thank you 🙂
MV: Yes, and given the tight correlation between Earth-Moon angular momentum changes and solar cycle timings …the tendency of the associative mind runs riot. 🙂
Beautifully graphed by P.A. Semi


Thanks Richard, an excellent post. I’ve just come across the Nils-Axel Mörner 2011 paper, “ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT BY THE MIDDLE OF THIS CENTURY”.
“At around 2040-2050 we will be in a new major Solar Minimum. It is to be
expected that we will then have a new “Little Ice Age” over the Arctic and NW
Europe. The past Solar Minima were linked to a general speeding-up of the Earth’s
rate of rotation. This affected the surface currents and southward penetration of
Arctic water in the North Atlantic causing “Little Ice Ages” over northwestern
Europe and the Arctic.”
Full paper here…
Click to access Moerner_Science_environm_sea_level_3_11_Paper_534.pdf
I would be interested to see how this fits in with your conjecture, Richard, as I think some elements could well be complementary.
@Rog…
Thanks for posting the brilliant graph done be Semi. I usually fin when an associative mind starts to run riot there is a good chance things are rapidly moving in the right direction… 😉
@Tenuc: Snow on a desert. People is happy as this snow will provide water in the summertime.
Snow at Coquimbo, Chile: 29° South : http://www.latercera.com/noticia/nacional/2011/06/680-374584-9-sistema-frontal-dejo-importante-cantidad-de-nieve-en-region-de-coquimbo.shtml
@Tallbloke: That would indicate that the whole system is a common system, plugged in at the same mains 🙂
@Tallbloke: From the paper you give: “I then realized that the Solar Wind might affect the rotation of the entire
terrestrial system (Mörner, 1996b, 1999). The Solar minima were found to correspond to periods of speeding-up of the Earth rate of rotation (Mörner, 2010). Changes in the Earth’s rate of rotation and their feedback interactions are illustrated in Figure 1. Many variables are interacting. Changes in the oceanic surface circulation are proposed to play the dominant role with respect to centennial and multi-decadal changes in climate (Mörner, 1995). Variations in the Solar Wind are held as the external driving force (Mörner, 2010).
That “external driving force” that some call “solar wind” it is not other than electricity, moving charges; that is why when it changes it changes the speed of the earth´s homopolar motor.
Adolfo, I seriously doubt it. There would be more sparks off the poles for a start. 😉
It all comes into the geomagnetic system as electromagnetic induction currents, and is distributed as LOD changes and ion charge gradation changes from (-)poles to (+)equator, acting thru the lunar declinational tidal meridional flow surges with the leading edges enhanced with ion concentrations from the source regions of the perturbed air masses.
The discharge path to ground is through precipitation balancing out the unlike charges at frontal boundaries, forming bands of neutral dry air masses during times of magnetic quiescence, that can give rise to local droughts when sustained conditions are stable. During times of slow sustained increases in geomagnetic field concentration, there is nothing to stop the increase in the width of the dry bands, until the geomagnetic field suddenly collapses “post some shift in the background magnet field” due to heliocentric conjunction of earth with a major planet, or the conjunction of two major planets to each other like Neptune and Uranus in 1993. With the end of the build up of coupling between them shifting to discharge mode the whole Mississippi river was out of its banks, very similar to this spring when Saturn had a synod conjunction with earth 3rd of April 2011.
Enhancing the severe weather tornado rates above the 1974 level when Uranus had a synod conjunction on the 16th April, 1974 and Neptune on 30th May 1974.
To not see the evaporation of sea water along the ITCZ as a + ion generating system, and the inductive surges of free electrons into the poles generating Aurora as the major current carriers they are blinds one to how the weather is driven from the sun/earth/lunar interactions and modulated by the electromagnetic induction effects of the outer planets, resulting in weather activity level shifts, that over time average out to be climate.
The short term periods of the inner planets and earth lunar tidal effects are driven by the solar wind changes as much or more than by TSI, the basic cycle pattern of their repeats is 6558 days. The basic pattern of the interactions of the outer planets is about 10 X that at 179 years, so that is one cycle of the compounding pattern of the beat between the inner and outer planetary interaction that drive short term(179 year) patterns of climate.
I am making forecast maps based on the 6558 day inner planet cycle, by now combining 4 of the past cycles into the coupled records that looks better at forecasting than just 3 cycles, if it was just background noise with out intelligence, it would degrade into more noise by combining any time periods together. But it seems to enhance the predictability of the combined signal the more cycles I add to the mix.
Currently working the bugs out of the process of QA the program and data base for errors, C/F conversion, additional station Id digit in the Canadian data set, and number of decimal places in the conversion from mm precip to X.xx”.
Sample maps are being tuned for best color contour scheme, minimum smoothing, maximum 8 nearest neighbors, higher grid resolution(from .5 to now .05 degree grid size), smaller <10 degree dia search ellipse, single degree step resolution in temperatures instead of 10 degree contour lines.
So far results are a lot prettier, and carry 100X more data detail.
I would still have to figure out how to incorporate the outer planet inductive impulses into the process to catch the surges in extreme weather they are responsible for. Piers Corybn works on that side of the forecasting angle with the solar activity changes due to outer planet positions, whether he looks at it that way or not.
Sorry i drifted off topic there for Volcanoes and quakes I think the electromagnetic effects are more similar to induction furnaces, where the combination of the tidal churning and the inductive heating keeps pushing the melt mix (magma) above and below the flux point of the fluidity/low viscosity, refreeze point to purge the lighter elements and compounds out toward the surface. Periods of LOD shift churns and blocks rise, and inductive surges assist with the density gradient enhancement.
That weather activity surges, and volcanic activity surges often occur together does no surprise me. The lag times are longer for volcanoes and probably for quakes have both slow and fast responses, depending on the type of fault system and relative volcanic interactions. I would be very uneasy about trying to find a fixed lag time to blanket apply to the whole picture.
*shorter ramble as I know less about…..*
This latest warm blast should cause a rise in eruptions.
It is good to see others have noticed an increase in eruptions at times of heightened solar activity.