



| Phoenix44 on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… | |
| saighdear on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… | |
| saighdear on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… | |
| energywise on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… | |
| brianrlcatt on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… | |
| saighdear on Swiss parliament snubs Europea… | |
| saighdear on Suggestions-50 | |
| oldbrew on Exploding nova alert | |
| oldbrew on Suggestions-50 | |
| Phoenix44 on Exploding nova alert | |
| oldbrew on Why is June so cold and when w… | |
| oldbrew on Why is June so cold and when w… | |
| liardetg on Why is June so cold and when w… | |
| stpaulchuck on New discovery reveals that oce… | |
| brianrlcatt on Suggestions-50 |

Good that you picked up this article, Rog.
It is time to close down IPCC since it is claiming to base its reports on science when not doing so. It is also time to stop all yearly UN conferencies based on the pretence that human actions (Carbon dioxide, methane etc emission) is causing climate change.
UN might perform good work in several ways but this line of action is for sure destroying the credibility of UN in all areas since its leader is a victim of superstition.
Hans saw your name on the list of signatories. I am sure there would have been lots more experts in their field if asked. One concern is that the list contains few engineers who through their training and experience know far more about heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, reaction kinetics, statistics, process measurements etc than any so-called “climate scientist”. In the last decade or two It seems too easy to get a PhD, get an academic position in some second rate University or Research Institute and then be called an expert.
Think about steam production and steam or gas turbines for electricity generation, refrigeration, air conditioning, and the simple “radiator” which does not radiate on a car engine, or the distillation of your favorite whiskey, all examples of heat transfer which no so called “climate scientist” seems to understand.
CF: Hans forwarded the draft letter to me and I emailed Tom Harris asking to be included in the list. He decided my engineering and Hist/Phil Science qualifications were not sufficiently ‘climate relevant’. He did include Christopher Monckton on the basis that he had been an IPCC reviewer though.
Your point is well made in my opinion.