NASA: Solar Wind Energy Source Discovered

Posted: March 11, 2013 by tallbloke in Astrophysics, Electro-magnetism, Energy, Geomagnetism, Measurement, Nuclear power, solar system dynamics, wind

Hat tip to Paul Vaughan [and A C Osborn on comments], who spotted this interesting new article at NASA’s website:

March 8, 2013: Using data from an aging NASA spacecraft, researchers have found signs of an energy source in the solar wind that has caught the attention of fusion researchers. NASA will be able to test the theory later this decade when it sends a new probe into the sun for a closer look.

The discovery was made by a group of astronomers trying to solve a decades-old mystery: What heats and accelerates the solar wind?

nasa-wind

The solar wind is a hot and fast flow of magnetized gas that streams away from the sun’s upper atmosphere.  It is made of hydrogen and helium ions with a sprinkling of heavier elements.  Researchers liken it to the steam from a pot of water boiling on a stove; the sun is literally boiling itself away.

“But,” says Adam Szabo of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, “solar wind does something that steam in your kitchen never does.  As steam rises from a pot, it slows and cools.  As solar wind leaves the sun, it accelerates, tripling in speed as it passes through the corona. Furthermore, something inside the solar wind continues to add heat even as it blows into the cold of space.”

Finding that “something” has been a goal of researchers for decades.  In the 1970s and 80s, observations by two German/US Helios spacecraft set the stage for early theories, which usually included some mixture of plasma instabilities, magnetohydrodynamic waves, and turbulent heating.  Narrowing down the possibilities was a challenge. The answer, it turns out, has been hiding in a dataset from one of NASA’s oldest active spacecraft, a solar probe named Wind.

Launched in 1994, Wind is so old that it uses magnetic tapes similar to old-fashioned 8-track tapes to record and play back its data.  Equipped with heavy shielding and double-redundant systems to safeguard against failure, the spacecraft was built to last; at least one researcher at NASA calls it the “Battlestar Gallactica” of the heliophysics fleet. Wind has survived almost two complete solar cycles and innumerable solar flares.

“After all these years, Wind is still sending us excellent data,” says Szabo, the mission’s project scientist, “and it still has 60 years’ worth of fuel left in its tanks.”

An artist’s concept of the Wind spacecraft sampling the solar wind. Justin Kasper’s science result is inset. [larger image]

Using Wind to unravel the mystery was, to Justin Kasper of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, a “no brainer.” He and his team processed the spacecraft’s entire 19-year record of solar wind temperatures, magnetic field and energy readings and …

“I think we found it,” he says.  “The source of the heating in the solar wind is ion cyclotron waves.”

Ion cyclotron waves are made of protons that circle in wavelike-rhythms around the sun’s magnetic field.  According to a theory developed by Phil Isenberg (University of New Hampshire) and expanded by Vitaly Galinsky and Valentin Shevchenko (UC San Diego), ion cyclotron waves emanate from the sun; coursing through the solar wind, they heat the gas to millions of degrees and accelerate its flow to millions of miles per hour. Kasper’s findings confirm that ion cyclotron waves are indeed active, at least in the vicinity of Earth where the Wind probe operates.

Ion cyclotron waves can do much more than heat and accelerate the solar wind, notes Kasper.  “They also account for some of the wind’s very strange properties.”

The solar wind is not like wind on Earth.  Here on Earth, atmospheric winds carry nitrogen, oxygen, water vapor along together; all species move with the same speed and they have the same temperature.  The solar wind, however, is much stranger.  Chemical elements of the solar wind such as hydrogen, helium, and heavier ions, blow at different speeds; they have different temperatures; and, strangest of all, the temperatures change with direction.

“We have long wondered why heavier elements in the solar wind move faster and have higher temperatures than the lighter elements,” says Kasper.  “This is completely counterintuitive.”

The ion cyclotron theory explains it: Heavy ions resonate well with ion cyclotron waves. Compared to their lighter counterparts, they gain more energy and heat as they surf.

The behavior of heavy ions in the solar wind is what intrigues fusion researchers. Kasper explains: “When you look at fusion reactors on Earth, one of the big challenges is contamination.  Heavy ions that sputter off the metal walls of the fusion chamber get into the plasma where the fusion takes place.  Heavy ions radiate heat. This can cool the plasma so much that it shuts down the fusion reaction.”

Ion cyclotron waves of the type Kasper has found in the solar wind might provide a way to reverse this process. Theoretically, they could be used to heat and/or remove the heavy ions, restoring thermal balance to the fusing plasma.

“I have been invited to several fusion conferences to talk about our work with the solar wind,” he says.

The next step, agree Kasper and Szabo, is to find out if ion cyclotron waves work the same way deep inside the sun’s atmosphere where the solar wind begins its journey.  To find out, NASA is planning to send a spacecraft into the sun itself.

Solar Probe Plus, scheduled for launch in 2018, will plunge so far into the sun’s atmosphere that the sun will appear as much as 23 times wider than it does in the skies of Earth. At closest approach, about 7 million km from the sun’s surface, Solar Probe Plus must withstand temperatures greater than 1400 deg. C and survive blasts of radiation at levels not experienced by any previous spacecraft.  The mission’s goal is to sample the sun’s plasma and magnetic field at the very source of the solar wind.

“With Solar Probe Plus we’ll be able to conduct specific tests of the ion cyclotron theory using sensors far more advanced than the ones on the Wind spacecraft,” says Kasper.  “This should give us a much deeper understanding of the solar wind’s energy source.”

The research described in this story was published in the Physical Review Letters on February 28, 2013: “Sensitive Test for Ion-Cyclotron Resonant Heating in the Solar Wind” by Justin Kasper et al. 
Author: Dr. Tony Phillips | Production editor: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA

Comments
  1. Paul Vaughan says:

    Persistence of solar rotation 27 day period heliomagnetic field (HMF, a.k.a. IMF where I = interplanetary) sector structure at Earth is related to both multidecadal & ~9 year sunspot area heliographic asymmetry:

    Background:

    Ballester, J.L.; Oliver, R.; & Carbonell, M. (2005). The periodic behaviour of the north-south asymmetry of sunspot areas revisited. Astronomy & Astrophysics 431, L5-L8.
    http://www.uib.es/depart/dfs/Solar/Preprints/A+A431.pdf

  2. michael hart says:

    Is the proposed Solar Plus Probe intended to go that far into the sun on an orbit that brings it back out again to cool off, or is it just a one way ticket?

    Also interesting to read about this older satellite. Sounds like some engineering the Victorians would have been proud of. 🙂

    …Which prompts the question: If another Carrington event were to cause significant satellite damage and economic loss, would we see big lawsuits against NASA/ESA/satellite-manufacturers to recover losses (on the basis that a Carrington event was predictable and that satellites can be built more ruggedly)?

    Do insurance companies even worry about this stuff since they probably realise by now that they are not being whacked by the late lamented global warming?

  3. A C Osborn says:

    Funny, I put this subject on your Suggestions forum 2 days ago, perhaps you were too busy to read it.

  4. tchannon says:

    A C Osborn,
    Co-mod writes, yes you did. I left this for discussion with Rog, who unfortunately is having technical problems.
    Apologies. I’ll add a note to the blog article.

    Tim

  5. A C Osborn says:

    Tim, thanks for the reply, I was just wondering if that was the correct way to bring something to Roger’s attention?

  6. tallbloke says:

    ACO: Apologies, you had first call for a H/T here. I saw it on suggestions, then it slipped off my radar with the Oxford travel, then my mail server was down, then Paul Vaughan emailed me the link.

  7. vukcevic says:

    Cold telescope faces hot death
    Herschel space observatory nears its end after unravelling star formation and tracking dust from supernovae.
    http://www.nature.com/news/cold-telescope-faces-hot-death-1.12577

  8. p.g.sharrow says:

    This may contain valuable clues as to the effects of gravity, mass/inertia and the stuff of space. pg

  9. Paul Vaughan says:

    ~27.03 days solar rotation ~60 year cycle

    (27.03)*(27) / (27.03 – 27) = 24327 days
    24327 / 365.24219 ~= 66.6 years
    data