Posted: March 12, 2013 by tallbloke in solar system dynamics

James at suyts space demolishes Marcott et al, Mike Mann and the NYT spinsters

suyts space

 

This is a fairly lengthy post, but I think it’s an easy read.  For people advanced in graphing and smoothing, you can skip some of mid parts.  It’s intended for laymen to come to a better understanding. 

 

This?  image  LOL, more like this.  image

Mikey Mann is babbling again!  From Tom Nelson……

Twitter / MichaelEMann

Watching the pro #climatechange#denial smear artists spinning desperately in wake of new article (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/08/science/earth/global-temperatures-highest-in-4000-years-study-says.html?_r=1& …). Dagger in heart?

Rolling on the floor laughing  Uhhmm, no Mikey, It’s done skeptics worlds of good!  You guys were pretty boring lately.  I mean sure, there’s ton’s of material to poke fun, still, but it gets monotonous.  Well, to tell the truth the hockey stick idiocy is monotonous, but, at least this is a newish twist. 

In a post yesterday, Hank did some heavy lifting for us.  I thought I’d try some light lifting.  Dr. Curry…

View original post 1,315 more words

Comments
  1. redcords says:

    The criticisms so far are interesting but nobody has shown where the blade actually comes from. My brave (or foolish) prediction is that we have a new trick that will be revealed in time.

  2. tallbloke says:

    You’d have thought after all the previous exposure of their inability to use statistical methods with precision sense or integrity, mainstream climate scientists would have called in the expert statisticians by now. If the Marcott paper is used in AR5 it will be the last shreds of the IPCC’s tattered credibility going down the pan.

  3. Sparks says:

    redcords says:
    March 12, 2013 at 10:37 am

    “The criticisms so far are interesting but nobody has shown where the blade actually comes from.”

    The blade is a statistically biased mockup from the modern global temperature anomaly which is a high resolution time series, unscientifically merged into a statistically biased mockup of the paleolithic low resolution proxy time series.

  4. suyts says:

    TB, just want to come by and thank you for the plug! It’s appreciated!

  5. tchannon says:

    suyts, you’ve been on the blogroll for some time here because from time to time there is mind provoking content. eg. gravity/sea level “discussions”, a lot about jason (satellite) which we were not covering much. I was fed up with the saga, so point at who is writing.
    Content elsewhere helps make this blog more eclectic.

  6. tallbloke says:

    Seconded, well said Tim. Thanks for the post Suyts.

  7. oldbrew says:

    Steve McIntyre continues exposing the ‘methods’ of the Marcott paper.

    ‘As noted in my previous post, Marcott, Shakun, Clark and Mix disappeared two alkenone cores from the 1940 population, both of which were highly negative. In addition, they made some surprising additions to the 1940 population, including three cores whose coretops were dated by competent specialists 500-1000 years earlier’

    http://climateaudit.org/2013/03/17/hiding-the-decline-the-md01-2421-splice/