What I think about Climate Change #3: Norman Baker MP

Posted: March 30, 2013 by tallbloke in climate, government, Politics

Another in our “what the MP’s were saying in 2006” series. This time it’s Norman Baker MP. These days he’s the Parliamentary Under Secretary for Transport.

norman-bakerNorman Baker Lewes, Lib Dem;
Chair, All-Party Environment Group

1: Climate change is a threat greater than any other faced by mankind and is therefore the most important political issue of our time. This means that we need to take urgent action on both the domestic and international stages. Climate change is a reality today, and is already having a huge impact on natural systems across the world, with ice-caps in retreat, coral reef bleaching, the extinction of numerous species, and increased frequency of extreme weather events. In the future, if insufficient action is taken, we face the prospect of catastrophic flooding in some countries alongside ruinous drought and famine in others. This will mean not only terrible human suffering, but economic disaster as well. I very much welcome the recent Stern Review, which may at last make those who somehow believe that the economy and environment are separate matters realize that, rather they are inextricably linked. If we want to stop the worst impacts of climate change, I believe it is vitally important that the average global temperature increases stay below 2°C from pre-industrial levels. Unfortunately, however, we are already much of the way there. Avoiding rises in temperature beyond 2ºC will therefore require dramatic and urgent reductions in emissions of greenhouses gases by all industrialised countries.

 

2: Firstly, Britain needs to lead by example by putting its own house in order. The government has already admitted that the UK is going to miss the target of a 20% reduction in carbon emissions by 2010 and figures show that emissions of CO2 have actually been rising year on year. This is quite simply unacceptable. We therefore need radical and innovative measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions, backed up by a timetable of annual, binding targets. We need to make significant changes to the tax system to incorporate green taxes and market mechanisms that discourage environmentally unfriendly behaviour and, in turn, reward sustainable lifestyle choices. In particular we need to make significant progress on reducing emissions from aviation and make far- reaching changes to our energy policy to reduce demand, increase efficiency and develop the use of a wide variety of renewable energy sources. On the international stage, Britain should use its so-called ‘special relationship’ with the US to push for action from the world’s biggest polluter, and more generally use our international status to promote a new, enforceable international agreement to reduce emissions to a sustainable level based on the so-called principles of contraction and convergence.

3: As I have become more aware of the dangers of climate change, my family and I have made a large number of changes to our lifestyle and consumption patterns over the years in order to reduce our carbon footprint. At home, we try to recycle as much as possible, and any kitchen or garden waste gets put in our compost bin. We make an effort to shop for food which is locally sourced and in season, thereby cutting food miles to a minimum, and I try to avoid food and other products with excess packaging. We are changing all my lights to energy saving bulbs as they expire, and we also make energy efficiency an important consideration when we buy any new domestic appliances. We have sourced our electricity from a green supplier. My role as an MP inevitably involves a lot of travelling, but we are now managing with just one car which we try to use a little as possible. Instead, I make the most of public transport always travelling by train between my constituency in Lewes and London and also increasingly around my constituency. If I have to travel within Europe, I can nearly always use the train rather than the plane, but when air travel is inevitable, I offset my carbon emissions. Over the years, both as the former Lib Dem Shadow Environment Secretary and current chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Environment group, I have made climate change my top priority, trying to raise awareness among fellow parliamentarians, constituents and members of the public. If all of us make small changes to our habits and lifestyles, then the cumulative effect will actually have a significant impact on our greenhouse gas emissions. We can all do something to help tackle climate change.

Comments
  1. Roger Andrews says:

    Anyone notice how all of these politicians are reading from the same prayerbook?

    I wonder who wrote the gospel.

  2. vukcevic says:

    After leaving university Norman held a variety of jobs: Regional Executive Director of Our Price Records, clerk at Hornsey Railway Station, manager of a wine shop, teacher of English as a foreign language

  3. tallbloke says:

    Roger A: Anyone notice how all of these politicians are reading from the same prayerbook? I wonder who wrote the gospel.

    Exactly. When we move from Libdems to Cons and Labs, we’ll see if the messages they parrot are the same or not That’ll give us a clue as o whether the MP’s were toeing a party line, or whether they were briefed by civil servants in a cross party manner.

  4. J Martin says:

    What’s known as a useful idiot. Just like all our MPs, bar the 3 who didn’t vote for the climate change act.

    He said If all of us make small changes to our habits and lifestyles, then the cumulative effect will actually have a significant impact on our greenhouse gas emissions. We can all do something to help tackle climate change.

    Does he realise that if we all did as he suggests that all our efforts would have no effect whatsoever on temperatures. Presumably not.

    I wonder how many of these blinkered fools will fail to get re-elected as the sun’s magnetic field continues to wane over the coming solar cycles and temperatures fall. I hope that non of them (bar the 3 with actual brains, common sense and integrity who didn’t vote for the climate change act).

  5. graphicconception says:

    “We are changing all my lights to energy saving bulbs as they expire, and we also make energy efficiency an important consideration when we buy any new domestic appliances. We have sourced our electricity from a green supplier. ”

    It all sounds good until you do the sums. Some time ago, the figures might be different now, the UK contributed 2% of the world’s CO2. China was increasing the global levels by 0.5% per year.

    What difference would it make if all our lightbulbs were low energy?

    We can do better than that, assume they are all “no energy” lightbulbs. That is, do not use light bulbs at all. We could also ban: cars, vans lorries, boats, planes, houses, offices, factories, power stations and even stop breathing. In fact, if we shut down the entire UK and marched the population down into the disused coal mines and sealed them (us) in to prevent any CO2 escape then we could save all of that 2%.

    China would make up the deficit in 4 years. So we could sacrifice the country and save 4 years for the world. (What would happen after that 4 years, anyway?)

    I notice that others are starting to do these calculations too. The Germans should be able to save 37 hours for the world by spending $110 billion. See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3002372/posts?page=31 amongst others.

  6. Roger Andrews says:

    The 1987 Montreal Protocol, which banned CFCs, cost three times as much and saved the world – well, nothing so far because the Antarctic ozone hole is still there. But not to worry, say the scientists, it’ll be gone by 2070.

  7. Re: tallbloke (Mar 30 22:43),

    They’re reading from the same hymn sheet as devised by IPPR.

    Its memes infiltrated the language of the alarmists and their tools.

  8. tckev says:

    2006 was when the UN via the IPPC was trying to take over national responsibilities. The EU was a willing player in this, until they realised that they too would loose to the UN. All the while Britain (both politicians and public) had nearly swallowed the entire glut of propaganda from the IPPC, hook line and sinker.

    Now it is starting to dawn on the political establishment that they have been duped by the EU and UN, and as the tough times kick in these undemocratic entities demand more. Will the UK be brave enough to pull back from the edge? Pull away from previous agreements with these unelected unions? I doubt it, British politicians enjoys the empty international kudos of “punching above it’s weight” regardless of domestic cost.

  9. Richard111 says:

    Target culture. Targets and more targets. Set a target for a problem so it may be resolved in an orderly and timely manner. Yes! Of Course! /sarc
    What targets have ‘they’ set to resolve the coming food riots I predict will occur before the year is out?

  10. Berényi Péter says:

    And . this . guy . gets . elected ? Evah?

    For ye haue the poore foolish alwayes with you, but you elect them to excert power & reign over your life only if you yorself are troubled.