Being a habitual tree-planter myself, I kind of welcome this sort of initiative from Prince Charles and others. I really wish they’d resist the temptation to screw it up with made up politically loaded words like Anthropocene though…
London, Wednesday 8th May 2013 1 St James’s Palace Memorandum on Tropical Forest Science His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales has invited a group of tropical forest scientists, in the company of Ministers, senior representatives of Governments, and leaders from civil society and the private sector, to gather in London at the Royal Society and at St. James’s Palace. In this meeting, we have reviewed and discussed the latest developments and key priorities for tropical forest science in the context of the multiple pressures facing tropical forests.
1) tropical forests are the greatest terrestrial harbours of biodiversity on this planet, and that they have a major influence on the global cycles of carbon, water, energy and patterns of rainfall;
2) there is immense value in many types of tropical biomes, including rainforests, dry forests, savannahs and mangroves;
3) tropical forests support sustainable livelihoods for people, and provide multiple ecosystem services at local, regional and global scales;
4) tropical forest peoples have lived in and used tropical forests for millennia, and have knowledge and insights that can contribute to forest conservation ;
5) tropical forests provide many ecosystem services, including conservation of biological diversity, in addition to their value as carbon stores and sinks. Human-modified tropical forests provide critical ecosystem services, including the provision of hydrological services, timber and non-timber products, and these can be enhanced through conservation, restoration and sustainable management efforts. ARE CONCERNED BY: the multiple and unprecedented combination of press ures on tropical forests in this era of global change, the Anthropocene, from deforestation, degradation, defaunation and atmospheric change, such that no tropical forest is now free from human influence.
RECOGNIZE the:
1) poor current scientific understanding of how the biodiversity and functioning of tropical forests are responding, and will continue to respond, to structural disturbances from logging, fire and the processes of defaunation and atmospheric change;
2) need to improve our knowledge on the diversity, distribution and interaction of tropical species as a basis for conservation planning and evidence-based management;
3) need for enhanced scientific effort to understand t he provision and use of tropical forest ecosystem services, in order to provide the knowledge base to conserve the tropical forests and ensure that use of their natural resources is sustainable. This imp roved understanding could lead to enhanced incentives and more cost-effective approaches for t ropical forest conservation and the sustainable use of the forests’ natural resources;
4) particular need for focused research into human-modified tropical forests, which constitute a large proportion of tropical forests and host much biodiversity and functional value.
5) need for detailed, large-scale and long-term monitoring of tropical forest flora, fauna and ecosystems with the aim to better understand and pr edict the short and long-term impacts of local and global change, and to act as early warning systems signalling biodiversity decline or the approach of critical thresholds and possible tipping points in ecosystem function;
6) need greatly to enhance scientific capacity and awareness in many tropical forest nations, both in basic science and in state-of-the-art techniques. Such enhancement would assist forest monitoring in London, Wednesday 8th May 2013 2 tropical nations, and build and invest in the capability of in-country experts with an understanding o f the multi-faceted value of tropical forests.
7) need to improve communication and collaboration bet ween scientists, decision-makers and the media, better to inform policy and guide scientific research.
WELCOME the:
1) ongoing efforts of governments, private sector and civil society organizations – especially of many tropical forests nations, peoples and individuals – to slow down the rates of deforestation and degradation, and to increase tropical forest conser vation and restoration to enhance the adaptive capacity of tropical forests in the context of global change.
2) existence of many scientific monitoring efforts and networks across the tropics that are yielding valuable insights into the functioning and composition of tropical forests and how they are changing over time;
3) current expansion of forest monitoring across the tropics in the context of REDD+, which presents an opportunity better to understand tropical forest s and their ecosystem services beyond their carbon value.
Therefore, by this Memorandum, we CALL for:
1) strategic investment in big science, that supports the integration and expansion of global tropical forest monitoring networks drawing on existing monitoring efforts. Such networks would adopt the established methods of tropical forest monitoring, but also incorporate cutting edge technologies such as genomics, airborne and satellite remote sen sing;
2) long-term international commitment to both field- and remote sensing monitoring of tropical forest responses to the multiple pressures that constitute the Anthropocene;
3) wider availability of tropical forest data, and modelling outputs, to understand better and predict how tropical forests respond to these pressures. This includes long-term open access to global satellite remote sensing data sets, as exemplified by the Landsat programme, to ensure transparent, up-to-date, and retrospective information on forest cover change;
4) enhanced research into the nature and distribution of tropical forest biodiversity, the many poorly understood ecosystem services that pristine and hum an-modified tropical forests provide, and into the socio-economic drivers that affect those services;
5) increased efforts to improve understanding of the critical linkages between the supply of ecosystem services and their importance to people at local, regional and global scales; 6) governments and the private sector to engage with scientists in developing strategies that conserve forest ecosystems while meeting human needs; 7) development of programmes to enhance and devolve capacity in natural and social sciences in tropical forest nations through in situ support for training and infrastructure, and inter national scholarships and grants in tropical forest science and conservation for students and researchers from these nations.







I think it says: “Tropics are good.”
So, bring on the heat!
Professor Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of BioGeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, wrote this in 2003:
“At the end of the last ice age, only some 12-18000 years ago, the tropics were covered by seasonal savannah grasslands, cooler and much drier than now. There were no rain forests in the Malay Peninsula and much of Amazonia, and, despite the increasing human development of forested space, there are still more rain forests persisting than existed then. As in Europe and North America, the forests came and went as climate changed; there is no Clementsian “long period of control” under one climate. Beneath many rain forests, there are sheets of ash, a testimony in the soil to past fires and non-forested landscapes.”
He still maintains a site here:
http://www.probiotech.fsnet.co.uk/trfseminar.html
Items like these never get much traction:
“Brazil: Ancient Amazon Actually Highly Urbanized” August 31st 2008
“The report in Friday’s edition of the journal Science, describes clusters of towns and smaller villages that were connected by complex road networks and were arranged around large central plazas. Researches also discovered signs of farming, wetland management and fish farms in the ancient settlements that are now almost completely covered by rainforest.”
http://en.mercopress.com/2008/08/31/brazil-ancient-amazon-actually-highly-urbanized
“Stone age etchings found in Amazon basin as river levels fall”: 10 November 2010 Guardian
“Archaeologists who have studied the photographs believe the art – which features images of faces and snakes – is another indication that thousands of years ago the Amazon was already home to large civilisations.
“Eduardo Neves, president of the Brazilian Society of Archaeology and a leading Amazon scholar, said the etchings appeared to have been made between 3,000 and 7,000 years ago when water levels in the region were lower. The etchings were “further, undeniable evidence” that the region had been occupied by a significant number of ancient settlements and people.””
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/10/amazon-brazil-stone-age-etchings?CMP=EMCGT_111110&
This is still online:
SOUTH AMERICA DURING THE LAST 150,000 YEARS – Jonathan Adams, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
“In general, it would seem that 150-130,000 y.a. the continent showed the general glacial-age pattern of colder and more arid conditions. After about 130,000 y.a., climate warmed and moistened and the forests reached a similar area to the present. After 115,000 y.a., cold and aridity began to influence the vegetation, to an arid, cool maximum around 70,000 y.a., followed by erratic but generally fairly cool and drier-than-present conditions throughout the continent. A second cold, arid maximum began around 22,000 years ago and lasted until about 14,000 14C y.a., after which rainfall and temperatures increased and the forests returned over several thousand years.”
http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/nercSOUTHAMERICA.html
It seems like the “global cycles of carbon, water, energy and patterns of rainfall” affected the rainforest, and dictated the vegetation, rather than the other way around. Maybe HRH should read a little more widely.
As I’ve been trying to say to any of my friends and family who will still listen to me about CAGW [or anything else] is that land-use changes and deforestation, particularly in the tropics, is something we really do need to worry about – for lots of good reasons other than global warming. I’m glad that ‘certain other people’ are beginning to catch onto this.
It’s interesting what Dennis has to add, and agree with him about the historical and prehistorical human effects upon the rainforest. In the Darien of Panama for instance [as opposed to the Darien of Connecticut] as a formidably impassable jungle as you are likely to find anywhere [I know I’ve trudged both Dariens] dig down *anywhere* and you’ll find a layer of ash. You think the place has been there since dinosaurs roamed the Earth, but in fact almost every hectare has been farmed within the last six hundred years by somebody – you’ll find their descendents scattered around doing the same thing today. I would just be careful not to neglect the importance of how forest can drive the hydrological cycle locally and regionally. You probably wouldn’t want to continue to chop it all down willy-nilly – seems like a waste.
W^3