Michael Mann: Look! Their bad stats support my bad stats!

Posted: May 15, 2013 by tallbloke in alarmism, humour, Incompetence, Legal, propaganda
Still hiding the decline there Mikey. PAGES uses a different ‘Nature Trick’ (Science Trick actually – Nature rejected the paper)

Original MBH99 #HockeyStick (blue) vs. recent PAGES 2k temp reconstruction (green) & instrumental record (red) #HSCW pic.twitter.com/9X00ffq2gx

 Retweeted by Steve Bloom

From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.


Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx

  1. craigm350 says:

    Reblogged this on CraigM350.

  2. oldbrew says:

    Try this graph instead – note the most recent ten years.