Willis on top form.
Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
The US has some of the world’s most boring looking money—it’s all green. So we have terms like “greenbacks” for dollars, and “long green”, meaning lots of money.
I offer this as context for what I found when I got to wondering what had happened to the United Nations “Green Climate Fund”. You may recall that the Green Climate Fund was set up by the UN as the only result of the recent Rio de Janeiro Cancun conference on climate idiocy. When the Fund is going full throttle, it is supposed to disburse no less than $200 billion ($200,000,000,000) dollars each and every year to the developing countries.
It turns out that, unlike those of us skeptics who are falsely accused of receiving big bucks from big oil, the “Green Climate Fund” has already raked in millions of dollars to spend on fighting the evil…
View original post 984 more words
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
Willis is far better revealing corruption than doing or judging climate science.
Hans, if Willis agreed with the content, he would be full of admiration for the brevity of your ‘elevator speech’. 😉
$7.5 million is pocket change. The worldwide global warming industry squanders that much about once every eleven minutes.
http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/global-landscape-of-climate-finance-2013/
If Global Warming were a company it would be the seventh largest in the world – a hair behind BP and Saudi Aramco, but handily ahead of VW, Toyota, Samsung and the State Grid Corporation of China, and over twice the size of GM and Apple.
In the next life I may apply to be a ‘pluted bloatocrat’ – see main story for job description. Taxi !
Roger Andrews, now that is probably the most important thought I have heard yet. Even if you mind I am going to use that as one of my main points when battling this insanity! 😉
Wayne: Feel free.
Setting up Global Warming as a public company and having it compete with other energy companies on a level playing field would in fact be a good way of injecting some reality into the proceedings.
Tallbloke, I wrote an increase in solar activity caused a decrease in stratospheric temperature and speed jet stream. As I wrote lows go north.
http://www.sat24.com/?ir=true&ra=true&li=false
Carbon derivatives to become World’s largest derivatives market ?
http://economicedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/carbon-derivatives-to-become-worlds.html
Hmmm, bets on bets on air ? What ??
Another angle is,, the net available oil exports to other than Chindia go to zero shortly at current rate of consumption,so the less you burn, the more they can.
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/9721/935806
Tallbloke this is the storm, which I wrote about.
http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/late-october-snowstorm-rockies-plains/19201451
The forecast stratosphere that for five days over Europe napłynie air from the north.
ren: sorry for not responding, I have a lot to do at the moment. Keep giving us your observations, they are valuable.
Tallbloke see how increasing Kp and automatically drops cosmic rays.
