Reposted from Battsby’s blog:

Do you remember Up Pompeii? Frankie Howerd, as Lurcio, regularly encountered a series of unlikely characters who dragged him into their deranged world with increasingly far-fetched but ultimately pedestrian plots, almost always relying on deception and the concealing of truths on pain of death. None of Lurcio’s encounters were met with such dread and derision as those with Senna the Soothsayer. “Woe, woe and thrice woe…”? Well, that’s the climate change lobby, that is.
If you believe an upcoming UN report, Senna was right. In a preview in The Independentthe report warns of floods, earthquakes and plagues of locusts. The earth will shake and the seas will boil and death will stalk the land. Wars will be fought for food and world populations, far from rising, will be driven down to Stone Age levels. Kevin Costner will come to be vindicated, even worshipped, as the prophet of Waterworld and the quest to find the mythical Dryland will be man’s final hope for survival. Woe, woe and thrice woe, indeed.
All of which makes me wonder what’s in it for them. Global Warming has become Global Lying or at best Global Fibbing-a-bit. Based on lies, half-truths and projections based on methods few scientists would recognise, the climate change industry actually heralds a coming age of prosperity for many. The report will quantify things they can’t explain and make predictions based on trends they haven’t observed and yet, we’re told, there’s a consensus. Yes, there’s a consensus; there’s a general recognition of a huge market for plausible apocalypse fiction, sold as fact to doom-hungry consumers of bad news.
Populations have moved in response to climate and geographical change for ever. In fact the whole history of man is related to the species’ migration across slowly changing continents and occasionally from fast-changing events. Floods, droughts, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, mudslides, avalanches and disease have always happened and I’m pretty sure Noah’s little escapade wasn’t the result of too many burnt offerings. Or maybe it was? Maybe The Bible marks the first step in spreading climate change propaganda as a vengeful God blames his flood on the activities of mankind.
But mankind is nothing if not adaptable and the basis for species survival is to exploit niches. Look around you. All those bird choppers, solar panels gleaming from rooftops, condensing boilers, heat pumps, insulation, draught-proofing; climate fear is driving all of that. The Warm Front Scheme,* the Green Deal, the Energy Company Obligation and incentives for ‘green’ industry, there is money to be made. Nobody is going to be around long enough to win the ‘is it – isn’t it?’ climate change debate, but that’s not the point.
The great global warming gold rush is with us now and as with the real gold rush the money is not going to be made by the diggers and grafters, the bent-back prospectors but by those who sell them shovels and blankets. Fuck the planet, they say, it’ll see me and mine out, but there’s gold in tham-thar beliefs. So whether you are peddling newsprint, for or against, or supplying dodgy justifications for the purpose of claiming subsidy, or manufacturing kit for the new eco shrines, there is treasure to be had.
The agricultural and industrial revolutions, the ages of steam and rail and flight and information, all have brought benefits to those willing to accept them and so it is now as we usher in the bright new dawn of Environmental Capitalism. Watch as today’s unwashed protesters suddenly realise they have tales to tell, knowledge to sell and contacts to exploit and turn themselves – even while denying it – into Climate Mercenaries. Just as grizzled old class warriors have become titled lords (“It’s not for me, it’s for Pauline!”) the anti-frackers (gotta love Bez!) will eventually join the ranks of the privileged they profess to despise. Oh fickle fiends, oh weak-willed man, oh woe, oh woe, let’s grab that dough.






“There is money to be made” indeed. This seems a suitable place to remind everyone that Radio 4 yesterday put out a programme called “The Great Global Warming Gold Rush” on that very topic. (As though GW had ever been about anything other than money and power!) It’s here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03ynf5n
Depressing consequence: The more people there are whose livings depend on this fiction, the harder it’s going to be to convince Joe Public that there’s no actual science behind it.
However, I love the addition of the UN to the Four Horsemen! ;-D
This BBC report is well worth a listen if you want to get rich on real or imaginary climate change: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03ynf5n
If you type Senna the Soothsayer into GOOGLE look who comes up 2nd in the listings
@ Steve C
This Joe Public, a reluctant contributor to the taxation -funded ‘Climate’ merry-go-round, recognises the truism that ‘Too many cooks spoil the broth’.
The public’s confidence is in inverse proportion to the diversity of the scare stories.
Proof? David Shukman in his yesterday’s propaganda offering actually had to state one particular assessment was “honest”. To me, that indicates his previous assessments weren’t.
@Joe Public … (blush) …
Nothing personal, as you obviously realised. Maybe I should have said Jo Public, or are you married to her?
FWIW, I find that the phrase “The Emperor’s New Climate” usually raises a chuckle of recognition in getting the message across, too.
Of course, we now have “Slingo the soothsayer”
Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming has been history’s most costly and least successful advertising campaign. Uncounted millions (billions?) of dollars have been spent over the years in attempts to convince the public to buy it, but still the public remains unmoved. Donna LaFramboise has an article on it here:
They say insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results each time, so maybe these guys really are bonkers.
Lewis: “The greatest and most successful pseudo-scientific fraud in my long career as a physicist.” What price scruples?
Changes in the polar vortex may suggest that due to the decrease in solar activity will not be the most dangerous average drop in temperature, but sudden changes in temperature, which may surprise you agriculture.
You can see two centers of polar vortex at a height of 100 hPa (15 km). Where less ozone radiation is stronger.

Again decline in solar activity.
Region 12010 [S13W51] decayed slowly producing a few lowl level C flares.
Region 12013 [N09W33] was quiet and stable.
Region 12014 [S12W20] decayed slowly barely retaining trailing polarity umbrae.
Region 12015 [S12W81] decayed slowly and quietly.
Region 12017 [N10E07] was quiet and stable.
Region 12018 [N03E11] developed slowly and quietly.
Good cartoon but can be improved by giving the UN bloke a beard and long nose and mounted on an ass!
“The agricultural and industrial revolutions, the ages of steam and rail and flight and information, all have brought benefits to those willing to accept them and so it is now as we usher in the bright new dawn of Environmental Capitalism.”
That is quite a conceptual leap.
The use of subsidies, mandates, and environmental regulations to attack our energy supply and totally distort markets through political force and corrupted science is not capitalism. That is centralized, command economics. Citizens are forced to purchase worthless products they do not want at a price they cannot afford. Where the purchase is involuntary, it is not capitalism.
The beneficiaries in these cases are chosen by the government and its many rogue agencies. Now to claim it is “environmental capitalism” is basically saying, “government run capitalism.”
Sorry to hijack a thread, but is just found something I thought was worth looking at.
We’ve all seen the ~60 year periodicity in the surface temperature data. Here is a potential cause.
The Earth’s rotation axis is nutatiing with a period of about 18.6 years. However, that is only part of the story. In actual fact, the nutation takes the form of an elliptical cone, as shown here. The distance between the J2000 polar axis and the actual rotation axis looks like this. Its period is necessarily halved, to about 9.3 years.
Thus, the magnitude of the component of the magnetic moment of the Sun along the Earth’s rotation axis should have periods of about
T1 = 11*9.3/(11+9.3) = 5 years
T2 = 11*9.3/(11-9.3) = 60 years
Coincidence? Maybe. But, is there not a 5-ish year quasi-periodicity to the major temperature sets? Hard to say for sure, but there surely are several ups and downs which are in the neighborhood of 5 years.
Bart: Good insight. I’ve put it up as a new thread. Please discuss there: