Questionable Time #118

Posted: December 12, 2014 by tallbloke in solar system dynamics

.
.
A wry look at the #BBCQT Brand – Farage knockabout.

Questionable Time

qt 118
Good morrow lemmings and a very merry Dimblemas to you all! We’re in Canterbury for this edition, and lemme tell ya, it’s a real doozy. What even is a doozy. I don’t know. This is merely the first bout of confusion and distress you are no doubt about to experience in this week’s razzmatazz rendition of Questionable Time. Onwards!

There are actually more women on this panel than men, but who cares about that! It’s time to let the chaps speak for once. Where would we be without them

First up is a question about petty adversarialism. It is somewhat predictably answered by…petty adversarialism? Actually, no, for these are the five minutes at the beginning where everyone pretends to be ‘mature’ and ‘diplomatic’ before inevitably descending into the standard shit-slinging that goes on every week. When will they learn? At this point panellists shouldn’t even try to fight it, but…

View original post 1,335 more words

Comments
  1. linneamogren says:

    “There are actually more women on this panel than men, but who cares about that! It’s time to let the chaps speak for once. Where would we be without them.”

    That’s wonderful! But only if they are open minded.

  2. tallbloke says:

    It’s been a wild ride on the #bbcqt hashtag today

  3. p.g.sharrow says:

    Well, I read THE WHOLE THING, a mind numbing waste of effort! :-p pg

  4. michael hart says:

    I don’t watch Question Time. It is just theatre.

    I’m surprised they don’t offer free rotten tomatoes to the audience. That’s what they went there for.

    I’ll confess I’ve not seen much of either Brand or Farage (I don’t much like TV).
    But every time I see Brand speak, he seems to have taken another step down the David Icke road.

  5. Brian H says:

    Harry;
    No, but it’s a counter for human thought and effort, which do. In many cases.

  6. At one time I thought that stupidity always increases like entropy, from leftovers, additive!
    No! it is a double exponential, Each student doubles the stupidity of the teacher, and teacher has many students. Pythagoras’ and his Theorem, had one micro-gram of stupidity. Turn over is 20 years. Calculate the mass of stupidity in each professor? Calculate the mass of stupidity in all of them?