Ian Wilson: Connecting the Planetary Periodicities to Changes in the Earth’s LOD

Posted: May 31, 2015 by tallbloke in Analysis, Astrophysics, Celestial Mechanics, climate, Cycles, data, Forecasting, LOD, moon, Natural Variation, Ocean dynamics, solar system dynamics, Tides
Tags: ,

Relevant to current discussions on the talkshop concerning changes in Earth’s length of day (LOD) and the effect of planetary orbital resonances on the Moon’s orbital parameters and Earth climatic variation; this is a repost from Ian Wilson’s excellent Astro-Climate-Connection website. Ian very generously opens with a hat tip to this blog, (at which he is one of the ‘collaborators’ he mentions). 

Connecting the Planetary Periodicities to Changes in the Earth’s LOD
Monday, October 14, 2013 : Ian Wilson PhD

[(*) Some of the findings in this blog post concerning the connection between the Earth’s rotation rate and the planetary configurations have also been independently discovered by Rog “Tallbloke” Tattersall and his collaborators]

A. The Connection Between Extreme Pergiean Spring Tides and Long-term Changes in the Earth’s Rotation Rate as Measured by the Rate-of-Change of its Length-of-Day (LOD). (*)

If you plot the rate of change of the Earth’s Length of Day (LOD) [with the short-term atmospheric component removed] against time [starting in 1962] you find that there is a ~ 6 year periodicity that is phase-locked with the 6 year period that it takes the lunar line-of-nodes  to re-align with the lunar line-of-apse [see the first note directly below and reference [1] for a description of the method used to determine the time rate of change of LOD].

NB: The pro-grade precession of the lunar line-of-apse once around the Earth with respect to the stars takes 8.8504 Julian years (J2000) while the retrograde precession of the lunar line-of-apse line-of-nodes once around the Earth with respect to the stars takes 18.6000 Julian years (J2000). Hence, the lunar line-of-apse and the ascending node of the lunar line-of-nodes will realign once every:

(18.6000 x 8.8504) / (18.6000 + 8.8504)  = 5.9969 Julian years

Figure 1

ROC-LOD

[NB: that in the case of figure 1 the line-of-nodes and line-of-apse are just re-aligning with each other. They do not necessarily realign with the Sun – see figure 2].

A much better alignment between the lunar orbital configuration and the rate of change of the Earth’s LOD is achieved if we re-plot figure 1 below and superimpose the times when solar/lunar eclipses occur at or near the times of lunar perigee. These events occur at or very near to the times when both the lunar line-of-apse and lunar line-of-nodes point directly towards or away from the Sun. When the Moon is in this particular configuration with respect to the Sun and the Earth (marked by vertical red lines in figure 2), our planet experiences extremely strong luni-solar tidal forces known as Perigean Spring Tides. Figure 2 (top graph below) shows whenever this occurs, the rate of change of the Earth’s LOD undergoes an inflection in its value.

Figure 2
 rotation-tides

The tight relationship between the configuration of the lunar orbit and the rate of change of LOD is further reinforced by the lower graph in figure 2. This shows lowest velocity (in km/sec) of the Moon its orbit, when perigee occurs at or near the First/Last Quarter of the Moon. This is a reasonable proxy for the actual strength of global lunar tides impacting the Earth (see note below).

[NB: Keeling and Whorf (1997) indicate that an: “approximate relative measure of the global tide raising forces of individual strong tidal events is given by the angular velocity of orbital motion of the Moon with respect to the perturbed motion of perigee, in degrees of arc per day at the moment of maximum forcing. They go on to say that: “The tide raising forces define a hypothetical equilibrium tide which approximates the global average strength of the actual tides.”]

Hence, figure 1 and 2 firmly establish that there is a direct connection between the conditions that produce extreme Perigean Spring Tides and long-term changes in the rate-of-change in the Earth’s Length-of-Day (LOD).

Now, if we can show that the other planets of the Solar System have an effect upon setting the rates of precession of the line-of-nodes and line-of-apse of the lunar orbit then we can plausibly claim that the spatio-temporal configuration of the planets plays a role in producing changes in the Earth rotation rate on decadal to inter-decadal time scales.

B. Evidence that the Precession of the Lunar Line-of-Nodes and the Lunar Line-of-Apse are linked to the orbital period of the planets.

NB: The following arguments use these mean planetary orbital periods:

V = 224.70069 days = 0.615186 sidereal years
E = 365.256363004 days = 1.0000 sidereal year
J = 4332.75 days = 11.862216 sidereal years
Sa = 10759.39 days = 29.4571 sidereal years

1) The Lunar Lines-of-Apse

If we look at the realignment period between the half pro-grade synodic period of Jupiter and Saturn (1/2 JS cycle) with the retrograde realignment cycle of the inferior-conjunctions of Venus and Earth with the Terrestrial year (VE cycle) i.e.

1/2 JS cycle = 1/2 x 19.859 years = 9.9295 sidereal years [pro-grade]
VE Cycle___= 7.9933 sidereal years [retro-grade]

we find that:

(9.9295 x 7.9933) / (9.9295 + 7.9933) = 4.4284 sidereal years

This is extremely close to half the time of precession of the lunar line-of-apse with respect to the stars [= (8.8501 / 2) = 4.42505 sidereal years – error = 0.00336 years or 1.23 days].

2) The Lunar Line-of-Nodes

The line-of-nodes of the lunar orbit appears to rotate around the Earth, with respect to the Sun, once every Draconitic Year (TD = 346.620 075 883 days). This means if we start with the Earth and Jupiter aligned on the same side of the Sun and with the ascending node of the lunar line-of-nodes pointing at the Sun, then the ascending node of the lunar line-of-nodes will move from pointing along the Earth-Sun line to pointing at right-angles to the Earth-Sun line (or vice versa), at times separated by:

¼ TD = 86.65002 days 1st tidal harmonic
5 x ¼ TD = 1 ¼ TD = 433.275095 days = 1.18622 years 2nd tidal harmonic
5 x 1 ¼ TD = 6 ¼ TD = 2166.375474 days = 5.93111 years 3rd tidal harmonic

The first point that needs to be made about this is that there appears to be an almost perfect synchronization between the three tidal harmonic intervals and sub-multiples of the sidereal orbital period of Jupiter (TJ = 4332.82 days = 11.8624 sidereal years – note this is slightly different from the adopted value):

(1/50) x TJ = 86.6564 days
(1/10) x TJ = 433.282 days
(1/2) x TJ = 5.93120 years

The synchronization between the orbital period of Jupiter and the rate of precession of the lunar nodes is significant. However, this synchronization could be dismissed as just a coincidence, if it were not for one further piece of evidence that links the nodal precession of the lunar orbit with the orbital motion of the planets. A remarkable near-resonance condition exists between the orbital motions of the three
largest terrestrial planets with:

4 x SVE = 6.3946 years    where SVE = synodic period of Venus and Earth
3 x SEM = 6.4059 years             SEM = synodic period of Earth and Mars
7 x SVM = 6.3995 years   and    SVM = synodic period of Venus and Mars

This means that these three planets return to the same relative orbital configuration at a whole multiple of 6.40 years. Amazingly, the point in the Earth’s orbit where the 2nd tidal harmonic occurs (i.e. 1 ¼ TD), rotates around the Sun (with respect to the stars) once every 6.3699 years. This is just over three hundredths of year less than the time required for the realignment of the positions of the three largest terrestrial planets.

Thus, the realignment time for the positions of the three largest terrestrial planets and the orbital period of Jupiter appear to be closely synchronized with the time period over which the Earth experiences a maximum change in the tidal stress caused by the precession of the line-of-nodes of the lunar orbit.

CONCLUSION

The periods of precession of the line-of-nodes and line-of-apse of the lunar orbit (when measured with respect to the stars) appear to be synchronized with the relative orbital periods of Jupiter and the three largest terrestrial planets.

In addition, long-term changes in the rate of change of the Earth’s LOD [excluding short-term changes (less than a couple of years) cause by the exchanges of angular momentum between the atmosphere, oceans and the Earth’s crust] appear to be synchronized with the conditions that produce extreme Perigean Spring Tides.

This implies that the spatio-temporal configuration of the planets must play a role in producing changes in the Earth rotation rate that we see on decadal to inter-decadal time scales.

References

[1]  R. Holme and O. de Viron , 2005, Geomagnetic jerks and a high-resolution length-of-day profile for core studies.Geophys. J. Int. 160, 435–439
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02510.x

Comments
  1. tallbloke says:

    A good time for a repost I thought.🙂

    And I’m putting up Ian’s more recent post on Moon-El Nino next, for which this is a good intro.

  2. Jerry says:

    I wonder if there is any connection to El Nino, also about 6+- years?

  3. E.M.Smith says:

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Circumpolar_Wave

    has it as about an 8 year period like the VE Cycle and with 4 year nodes…

    Also, errata?:

    NB: The pro-grade precession of the lunar line-of-apse once around the Earth with respect to the stars takes 8.8504 Julian years (J2000) while the retrograde precession of the lunar line-of-apse once around the Earth with respect to the stars takes 18.6000 Julian years (J2000). Hence

    Ought not one of those ‘line of apse’ be a line of nodes?

    [mod note] yes, the second one – thanks

  4. oldbrew says:

    This graphic from another post shows how some of the lunar numbers (section A above) link up.

    LP = line-of-nodes, APC = line-of-apse, RLA = ‘~ 6 year periodicity’

    [NB 329 x 6 = 1974]

    The ratio of RLA to the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction period is 53:16 in just under 318 years (53 x 6y).

  5. tallbloke says:

    Encyclopedia of world climatology pp. 252

    https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-mwbAsxpRr0C&pg=PA251&dq=beach+ridges+fairbridge&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LnttVfbaLoSU7Aae14C4Cw&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=beach%20ridges%20fairbridge&f=false

    “The length of this seconary long-term oscialltion seems to have two components, of the order of a half and a third of a millenium. What manner of cycles are these?”

    RLA – JS alignment and 2x José perhaps…

  6. oldbrew says:

    TB: RLA and José would ‘meet’ at 144 J-S (9 x 16).

  7. tallbloke says:

    OB: That’d be Phi x 1767.

    Why does that number ring a bell?

  8. oldbrew says:

    We have examples of planetary cycles at 13, 21, 89, 144, and 233 J-S as a selection.
    Also 21 J-S x 6 is a multiple of 360 degrees of retrograde J-S movement (41 x 360).

  9. oldbrew says:

    Chaos in navigation satellite orbits caused by the perturbed motion of the Moon (Submitted on 9 Mar 2015)

    ABSTRACT
    Numerical simulations carried out over the past decade suggest that the orbits of the Global Navigation Satellite Systems are unstable, resulting in an apparent chaotic growth of the eccentricity. Here we show that the irregular and haphazard character of these orbits reflects a similar irregularity in the orbits of many celestial bodies in our Solar System. We find that secular resonances, involving linear combinations of the frequencies of nodal and apsidal precession and the rate of regression of lunar nodes, occur in profusion so that the phase space is threaded by a devious stochastic web. As in all cases in the Solar System, chaos ensues where resonances overlap. These results may be significant for the analysis of disposal strategies for the four constellations in this precarious region of space. [bold added]

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02581

  10. tallbloke says:

    Good spot OB. So. Lunar Nodal and Apsidal precession causing trouble for satellites.

    This should have gone on the Moons behaving badly thread.🙂

  11. oldbrew says:

    ‘the irregular and haphazard character of these orbits reflects a similar irregularity in the orbits of many celestial bodies in our Solar System’

    They don’t seem to have been reading our Why Phi posts carefully enough, if at all😉