GWPF: New Paper Reveals Hidden Cost Of UK Climate Policy

Posted: August 19, 2016 by tallbloke in Accountability, Energy, fuel poverty, government


A new paper published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)  confirms suspicions that previous governments have misled the public about the impact of climate policies on businesses such as Tata Steel.

There are three main faults in government analysis:


  1. Instead of showing the impact of climate policies on profitability (Gross Operating Surplus), the government has compared policy costs to the total expenditure of a business, which is misleading. In 2014, for example, the sector had an operating surplus of £169m, yet energy costs were equal to 330% of that sum.

  1. Government has limited its comments to present policy impacts, and ignored the much larger future effects revealed elsewhere in its own data. By 2020 DECC admits that the impact of its energy and climate policy will result in prices 76% higher for energy intensive businesses.


  1. Government has only examined direct energy cost impacts. It has failed to take into account the indirect pass-through effects, from one business to another, and also in the cost of labour. This means the cost of all inputs to a business will rise, not just energy costs. According to the Government’s Low Fossil Fuel price scenario that is now probable, by 2020 a medium sized business will see electricity prices 76% higher than they would be without green policies, and that prices to households will be some 42% higher.


Consequently, while the present is very uncomfortable, the future for UK businesses is bleak. Many businesses and investors will ask themselves whether there is any point in trying to ride out the present storm of high energy prices only to be sunk by the next one.


The steel sector is particularly sensitive to energy costs, and it is the first to feel the pain of the UK’s climate policies. Like the miner’s canary it gives early warning of a business environment that is toxic both to current enterprise and to future investment.


Dr John Constable, author of the study, said: “Improvements in economic competitiveness are still more essential as the United Kingdom prepares to withdraw from the European Union. Badly designed and needlessly expensive climate policies are an insurmountable obstacle and will need extensive revision in order to ensure this country remains an attractive place in which to invest industrial capital.”


Full paper

  1. oldbrew says:

    Pretty much the same story in Ireland – massive electricity price increases for dodgy policy reasons only.

  2. ivan says:

    Err. Shouldn’t the full paper link be:
    Full paper
    to get the PDF?

  3. tallbloke says:

    Thanks ivan, link updated.

  4. E.M.Smith says:

    Energy cost underpins ALL industry. To thrive, cut energy costs. To kill industry (and their dependent economies and societies) raise energy costs.

    It really is that simple.

    The AGW Green assault is nothing more nor less than an attempt to destroy industrial democracies and republics. To be replaced by global socialism run by an enriched elite.

    Why else would China and their industry be given a free carbon pass?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s