Trump proposes deep cuts to EPA, federal climate funding 

Posted: March 16, 2017 by oldbrew in climate, government, Politics

Budget squeeze time for US climate projects

The great US climate squeeze is getting under way, with political wrangling likely not far behind, as the alleged man-made climate scare gets downgraded.

President Trump’s first budget proposal includes a 31-percent cut to the Environmental Protection Agency as part of an administration effort to slash federal climate change funding. The budget blueprint, released on Thursday, provides $5.7 billion for the EPA, down from $8.3 billion.

The budget “discontinues” $100 million in funding for several climate change programs within the agency, including enforcement for a major Obama-era climate regulation, climate change research and international climate change support.

Trump’s budget slashes funding for industrial waste clean-up through the Superfund program. It also passes along deep cuts to research and development work, the EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance Office and state grant programs, and it eliminates funding for region-specific environmental work for areas like the Great Lakes and the Chesapeake Bay.

In all, the budget “eliminates more than 50 EPA programs, saving an additional $347 million” over current levels, and would end 3,200 of the agency’s 15,000 jobs. Trump’s budget is only a proposal, and Congress is tasked with writing the actual appropriations bills that fund the government.

Lawmakers are likely to take issue with several of his EPA plans and increase spending for the agency above what Trump wants. The Superfund program, for instance, is popular with members, and region-specific cuts will draw objections for members who represent those areas.

The EPA has absorbed a 20-percent cut since 2010, and some key Republican appropriators — even those who oppose the agency’s climate change work — have already raised concerns about the size and breadth of Trump’s proposal.

The administration says the budget “reflects the success of environmental protection efforts, a focus on core legal requirements, the important role of the states in implementing the nation’s environmental laws, and the president’s priority to ease the burden of unnecessary federal regulations that impose significant costs for workers and consumers without justifiable environmental benefits.”

In all, the EPA was one of the federal departments hardest hit by Trump’s budget. But he takes aim at climate change and energy research in other parts of his government.The proposal would eliminate several State Department climate programs, including funding for the Global Climate Change Initiative and American contributions to international climate change accounts.

Source: Trump Proposes Deep Cuts To EPA, Federal Climate Funding | The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

  1. AlecM says:

    Leave 30% of the EPA alone.

  2. spetzer86 says:

    I’m really pushing for claw backs on past spending

  3. p.g.sharrow says:

    What is needed is requests for grant proposals that prove Global Climate Change is a NATURAL process. Want to bet that Climate Scientists will find a new consensuses?…pg

  4. oldbrew says:

    Nothing for the IPCC…

    Date: 17/03/17 Karl Mathiesen, Climate Home

    In a budget blueprint released on Thursday morning, US president Donald Trump proposed sweeping cuts to US financial support for the global fight against climate change.
    . . .
    An official told Climate Home the State Department had not provided any funds appropriated in the 2017 financial year to the UNFCCC or IPCC.