Alan Carlin: A particularly troublesome aspect of climate alarmism

Posted: March 17, 2017 by oldbrew in alarmism, climate, propaganda
Tags: ,

Had enough of climate propaganda?

Last week EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt stated that: “I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do, and there’s tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that it’s a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.”

I can only applaud Pruitt’s thoughtful comments, writes Alan Carlin.

But in fact there is not just uncertainty as Pruitt said, but actual evidence that there are no significant effects of rising human-caused emissions or atmospheric CO2 levels on global temperatures.

The Climate-Industrial Complex (CIC) has responded to Pruitt’s comments with all its usual propaganda concerning 97% of scientists, sea level rise, scientific “consensus,” etc., all of which are either incorrect, misleading, or irrelevant to the CIC’s assertion that human activity is the primary contributor to global warming.

The Particularly Troublesome Aspect
The CIC response suggests what a serious problem the CIC has created by its climate alarmist propaganda. They have told the public, politicians, and the press that “global warming” (alias “climate change”) is primarily due to human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide, and that if this continues at current levels that this will result in catastrophic global warming.

Since carbon dioxide from human sources comes primarily from human use of energy, they claim that such use must be restricted if not ended. There are many problems with this argument.

First, most CO2 originates primarily from sources other than humans.

Second, the CIC has never proven that this hypothesis is valid science even though they are the ones arguing for huge public expenditures to implement their desired policies.

Third, climate skeptics have shown that every alarmist argument is contradicted by science.

Fourth, a recent study concludes that the basic alarmist hypothesis is scientifically incorrect by showing that increases in atmospheric CO2 levels have no statistically significant effect on global temperatures.

Fifth, the governmental actions the CIC proposes would have no measurable effect on global warming, and probably none at all, at a very high cost to taxpayers and ratepayers, particularly less well-to-do ones.

Continued here.
– – –
Talkshop note: we might add a sixth – most so-called greenhouse gas is in fact water vapour, not CO2.

  1. […] via Alan Carlin: A particularly troublesome aspect of climate alarmism — Tallbloke’s Talkshop […]

  2. Richard111 says:

    Carbon dioxide from human sources… hmm… before 1900 global population was around 1 billion. I suspect we will hit 8 billion by 2020. If each human breaths out, on average, about 600 grams of CO2 each day; what is the increase in CO2 from human sources only?

  3. oldbrew says:

    Opposition from the United States, Saudi Arabia and others has forced Germany to drop a reference to financing programs to combat climate change from the draft communique at a G20 finance and central bankers meeting.

  4. Graeme No.3 says:

    So they turned a daft communique into a draft communique?

  5. oldbrew says:

    Date: 17/03/17 Michael McDonald, Oil Price

    The trend in the United States of accelerating oil production does not seem to be slowing down.

    Date: 17/03/17 Deutsche Presse Agentur

    The emission of greenhouse gases in Germany has increased in 2016 despite all climate protection efforts.

    Too much traffic apparently – not to mention replacing nuclear power with coal :/

  6. p.g.sharrow says:

    “Asked about climate change programs, Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s budget director, told reporters on Thursday “we consider that to be a waste of (Americans’) money.”

    “I think the president is fairly straightforward. We’re not spending money on that,” he said.”

    I think that Mick Mulvaney said it all!

    Climate Change Programs are a waste of money…pg