Delingpole: Liberals Furious that New Head of NASA Is a Climate Change Skeptic

Posted: April 21, 2018 by oldbrew in climate, News, Politics

.
.
Keeping an open mind on climate matters is considered a thought crime in some quarters. Others think it’s just the rational approach.

Comments
  1. Jim says:
    April 21, 2018 at 12:19 pm

    Actually no. What is needed is an administrator there. Someone who will set plans into Actions. That we have sorely missed. Someone who dreams of adventure, and future in space, who will do more then send robots to space. Space is hard, but having all your eggs in one basket is harder.

  2. Graeme No.3 says:
    April 21, 2018 at 2:03 pm

    So he has no science degree? And how many of those at NASA Climate Changers have one?

  3. u.k.(us) says:
    April 21, 2018 at 7:34 pm

    I can’t produce a smile like that, certainly not on cue.
    Then again, mirrors freak me out.
    Sorry for the TMI.

  4. oldbrew says:
    April 22, 2018 at 5:04 pm

    He won’t be turning to California governor Brown for advice…

    Jerry Brown: 3 Billion Will Die from Global Warming
    April 19, 2018

    “We’re going to have widespread disruption, more conflicts, more terrorism, more insecurity because of climate disruption. The prospect is 3 billion people on this planet will be subject to fatal lethal heat events – 3 billion – and 1 billion will be subjected to vector diseases that they’re not now subject to now,” he said. “This is a horror.”

    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-arter/california-governor-predicts-billions-will-die-heat-because-climate

    A holiday in Antarctica might do him good :/

  5. nickreality65 says:
    April 23, 2018 at 11:22 pm

    The 396 W/m^2 upwelling and net 333 W/m^2 GHG energy loop as shown on the K-T power flux balance diagram (Figure 10 Trenberth et al 2011jcli24) is calculated using the S-B equation with an assumed emissivity of 1.0 and an average surface temperature of 16 C, 289 K. Because of the conductive/convective/advective/latent heat participating processes of the atmospheric molecules the actual and correct radiative emissivity is about 0.16, i.e. 63/396.

    This GHG energy loop is an inappropriate calculation with zero physical reality.

    Without this energy loop the radiative greenhouse effect theory fails.

    Without RGHE man-caused climate change does not exist.

    It’s called “science.”

    Don’t be frightened, spit out the Kool-Aid and give it a try.