Delingpole: Liberals Furious that New Head of NASA Is a Climate Change Skeptic

Posted: April 21, 2018 by oldbrew in climate, News, Politics

.
.
Keeping an open mind on climate matters is considered a thought crime in some quarters. Others think it’s just the rational approach.

CO2 is Life

NyeandBridenstine-2017-AP-640x480.jpgNASA’s new Administrator Jim Bridenstine is a climate change skeptic – and naturally the usual suspects are furious.

Continue Reading

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment

View original post

Comments
  1. Jim says:

    Actually no. What is needed is an administrator there. Someone who will set plans into Actions. That we have sorely missed. Someone who dreams of adventure, and future in space, who will do more then send robots to space. Space is hard, but having all your eggs in one basket is harder.

  2. Graeme No.3 says:

    So he has no science degree? And how many of those at NASA Climate Changers have one?

  3. u.k.(us) says:

    I can’t produce a smile like that, certainly not on cue.
    Then again, mirrors freak me out.
    Sorry for the TMI.

  4. oldbrew says:

    He won’t be turning to California governor Brown for advice…

    Jerry Brown: 3 Billion Will Die from Global Warming
    April 19, 2018

    “We’re going to have widespread disruption, more conflicts, more terrorism, more insecurity because of climate disruption. The prospect is 3 billion people on this planet will be subject to fatal lethal heat events – 3 billion – and 1 billion will be subjected to vector diseases that they’re not now subject to now,” he said. “This is a horror.”

    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-arter/california-governor-predicts-billions-will-die-heat-because-climate

    A holiday in Antarctica might do him good :/

  5. nickreality65 says:

    The 396 W/m^2 upwelling and net 333 W/m^2 GHG energy loop as shown on the K-T power flux balance diagram (Figure 10 Trenberth et al 2011jcli24) is calculated using the S-B equation with an assumed emissivity of 1.0 and an average surface temperature of 16 C, 289 K. Because of the conductive/convective/advective/latent heat participating processes of the atmospheric molecules the actual and correct radiative emissivity is about 0.16, i.e. 63/396.

    This GHG energy loop is an inappropriate calculation with zero physical reality.

    Without this energy loop the radiative greenhouse effect theory fails.

    Without RGHE man-caused climate change does not exist.

    It’s called “science.”

    Don’t be frightened, spit out the Kool-Aid and give it a try.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s