An Open Letter To The Geological Society

Posted: June 16, 2018 by oldbrew in climate, Critique
Tags: ,

.
How much longer can the erroneous fixed ideas of IPCC-based climate science last against the forces (see signatory list) of reason and rationality?

NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

GWPF carry the story of a letter recently sent to the president of the Geological Society by a group of concerned current and former members:

image

The President
Geological Society of London

Dear President

We are writing as a group of concerned primarily geoscientists, half of whom are or were Fellows, (names and affiliations listed below). Our concern is that the Society’s position on Climate Change (aka Anthropogenic Global Warming or AGW), is outdated and one-sided, and is distracting attention and funding from real issues of pollution such as plastic and other noxious industrial and domestic waste. To address this, we proposed to Colin Summerhayes that the 2010 and 2013 GSL Position Papers be posted on the Energy Matters blog, so that all sides of the discussion could be aired; and we are very grateful to Colin for effecting and taking part in this (http://euanmearns.com/the-geological-society-of-londons-statement-on-climate-change/). In…

View original post 3,231 more words

Comments
  1. Dodgy Geezer says:

    Not going to have any effect, though, is it?

    They will just say that while any individual item which is challenged may be wrong, there are ‘many more’ lines of evidence which show that AGW is true.

    Asked to name them they will handwave, and say that anyone rocking the boat is a ‘denier’, and therefore should not be listened to…

  2. pyromancer76 says:

    How can geologists who know the history of Earth and its many cycles and transformations be content to be tools of marxists and/or OneWorlders who are using AGW-Global Warming to gain tyrannical control over all current societies. Geologists should be the first to call out the fraudsters.

    I commented on one of my favorite geologist’s blog about the physics of CO2 (no possibility for this kind of GW given the data) and the evidence of Earth’s changes, especially those of cycling in the Holocene.

    I was barred from commenting. Something is rotten, not only in Denmark, but in the U.S. Geological Society and with too many geologists.

    We need integrity and adherence to the scientific method from our scientists, or they should be fired from their jobs.

    Thank you Tallbloke, Oldbrew and many others for a magnificent blog. I read your efforts every day.

    [reply] all support appreciated, thanks. Apols for moderation delays

  3. A C Osborn says:

    Dodgy Geezer says: June 16, 2018 at 5:31 pm

    Have you read the 2 posts at Energy Matters?
    Most of those “other lines of evidence” were soundly debunked during those discussions.
    Which may be the main reason for the letter.

  4. thefordprefect says:

    “The Society is the UK’s professional body for Earth science and has a worldwide membership of about 12,500. More than 2,000 of its members live overseas and over 2,500 are Chartered Geologists or Chartered Scientists – professionals who have demonstrated a high level of education, professional competence in their field and a commitment to professional ethics.”.

    12500 members 33 members signed that’s – 0.3%
    12500 members 69 members and concerned colleagues signed – that’s 0.5%

    Assuming all members are somewhere chartered then that works out at 1% signe out of 2500

    Seems to prove the 97% consensus to me

  5. oldbrew says:

    Proper science is not consensus-driven.

    Upcoming Research Will Buck The ‘Consensus’ And Show Antarctica Is Still Gaining Ice
    JUNE 17, 2018
    tags: Antarctic, Sea Level
    By Paul Homewood

    https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2018/06/17/upcoming-research-will-buck-the-consensus-and-show-antarctica-is-still-gaining-ice/

    CLAIMED ANTARCTIC ICE LOSS IN DOUBT
    Date: 17/06/18 P Gosselin, No Tricks Zone

    http://www.thegwpf.com/claimed-antarctic-ice-loss-an-artefact-of-statistical-waterboarding/

  6. John says:

    “12500 members 33 members signed that’s – 0.3%
    12500 members 69 members and concerned colleagues signed – that’s 0.5%

    Assuming all members are somewhere chartered then that works out at 1% signe out of 2500”

    Counting the entire group of members that didn’t sign as fully agreeing with the narrative are you? Perhaps the ones that did sign are the only ones bold enough to make a public statement. I don’t know of many companies whose employees are fully on board with all of the stances taken by the leadership, and I doubt many of those employees would band together to put out a written letter in public protest. Not a wise career move. Remaining silent does not confirm agreement or disagreement on the matter.

  7. Richard111 says:

    Wonder when the luddites will start their shenanigans?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s