Update 12/11/2018: Ian Wilson’s 2019 El Nino forecast can be found here.
Cognitive Dissonance: When a person or a group of people have attitudes, beliefs or behaviors that are in conflict with each other. Generally, this produces a feeling of mental discomfort that leads to an alteration in their attitudes, beliefs or behaviors that moderates their mental discomfort and restores balance.
I believe that the level of cognitive dissonance that we have about the influence of lunar tides upon El Nino events has become so large that something has to give.
In a series of blog posts in November 2014:
http://astroclimateconnection.blogspot.com/2014/11/evidence-that-strong-el-nino-events-are_13.html
I showed that between 1870 and 2025, the precise alignments between the lunar synodic [phase] cycle and the 31/62 year Perigean New/Full moon cycle, naturally breaks up into six 31-year epochs each of which has a distinctly different tidal property. Note that the second of these 31-year intervals starts with the precise alignment on the 15th of April 1870, with the subsequent epoch boundaries occurring every 31 years after that:
Epoch 1 – Prior to 15th April 1870
Epoch 2 – 15th April 1870 to 18th April 1901
Epoch 3 – 8th April 1901 to 20th April 1932
Epoch 4 – 20th April 1932 to 23rd April 1963
Epoch 5 – 23rd April 1963 to 25th April 1994
Epoch 6 – 25th April 1994 to 27th April 2025
I claimed that if the 31/62-year seasonal tidal cycle plays a role in sequencing the triggering of El Niño events, it would be reasonable to expect that its effects for the following three epochs:
Epoch 1 – Prior to 15th April 1870
Epoch 3 – 8th April 1901 to 20th April 1932
Epoch 5 – 23rd April 1963 to 25th April 1994
Full Moon Epochs:
Epoch 2 – 15th April 1870 to 18th April 1901
Epoch 4 – 20th April 1932 to 23rd April 1963
Epoch 6 – 25th April 1994 to 27th April 2025
Moderate-to-strong El Niño events in the Full Moon epochs preferentially occur near times when the lunar line-of-apse aligns with the Sun at the times of the Equinoxes.
Astonishingly, there has been almost no response from the climate science community concerning these important findings.
This terrible state of affairs persists even though there is overwhelming evidence that the Perigean New/Full tidal cycle must play a role in instigating moderate-to-strong El Nino events.
Finally, the following graph shows the months that are associated with moderate-to-strong El Nino events between 1962 and 1996 [histograms]. These months have been determined by Smith and Sardeshmukh [2000] (2) using a Bivariate ENSO Time Series (BEST) index that effectively combines the atmospheric component of the ENSO (i.e. the SOI index) with the oceanic component (i.e Nino 3.4 SST anomaly index). [Note that the less stringent list of El Nino months from Smith and Sardeshmukh (2000) are adopted here. The less stringent list uses 0.96 standard deviation cut-off rather than 1.28 (3),(4)]

A comparison between the timing of El Nino months and the times at which the strongest Perigean New/Full Moons approach lunar standstill, clearly show close alignments for eight out of ten of the moderate-to-strong El Nino events.
[N.B. The two moderate El Nino events in 1963/64 and 1993 that do not follow this pattern occur right near the boundaries of New Moon Epoch 5 where a transitioning is being made between New and Full Moon epochs. These two El Nino events appear to be part of the sequences associated with the Full Moon epochs (i.e. epoch 4 and 6) which occur when the strongest Perigean New/Full Moon events are close to the Celestial Equator.]
It is absolutely amazing that the climate community is ignoring such clearcut evidence in favour of this hypothesis that the 31/62-year Perigean New/Full moon tidal cycle is the trigger for moderate-to-strong El Nino events.
[N.B. The starting months for most of El Nino events in Epoch 5 are close to times where either full moons at standstill occur in the northern hemisphere near the winter solstice (i.e December) or new moons occur at standstill in the southern hemisphere near the winter solstice (i.e. December: The convention is to use the Northern Hemisphere as the template for naming the Summer (Jun 21st) and WInter Solstices (Dec 21st))
). These are the strongest Perigean New/Full moons over the period between 1963 and 1994.]
References:
[1] JPL Horizons Web Interface Ephemeris – https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi#top – last accessed 14/10/2018
[2] Smith, C.A. and P. Sardeshmukh, 2000, The Effect of ENSO on the Intraseasonal Variance of Surface Temperature in Winter, International J. of Climatology, 20 1543-1557.
[3] http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/cathy.smith/best/
[4] http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/cathy.smith/best/table33.txt






Typo: ‘Epoch 3 – 8th April 1901 to 20th April 1932’ should read:
Epoch 3 – 18th April 1901 to 20th April 1932
(appears twice)
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.
OK, I sent a typo email to Ian as well. So in case he thinks we’re just nitpicking, I want to say, this is the best representation of the data he’s made yet. It looks so clear and obvious now. Awesome work!
Bee Keeper
Climatic scilence peeking thru hellsinkey revealed to us in sin R-rated well–red tape.
“Firstly, certain points-of-view will be written off. Secondly, and most important, points worth making will be regulated into oblivion. […] This is an era of submerging the power of discourse.”
=
UNo the art isn’t gone
holdin’ IT tightly canine devotion caught on command
Still can’t believe
They’re ‘is ally?
NO.1 can know how we feel
Blame all The Movement to give IT a way
Leap of faith
doU doU?bt
Promises promise
an i foreign eye
Whatever U d00
Don’t tell anyone
=
“The Lost Art of Keeping a Secret” — Queens of the Stone Age
naturally breaks up into six 31-year epochs……which sums to 186 years = 196 draconic years
Draconic year: ‘the time taken for the Sun (as seen from the Earth) to complete one revolution with respect to the same lunar node (a point where the Moon’s orbit intersects the ecliptic)’ – Wikipedia.
– – –
Update: on second thoughts, 21 lunar apsidal cycles = ~186 years seems more relevant.
Ian is correct in his explanation of El Nino epochs. When I looked into the potential relationship between El Nino episodes, lunisolar orbital motions and Argo float trajectories a few years ago, it was quickly apparent that El Nino episodes corresponded to New or Full Moon timing plus or minus four days. The plus or minus range suggested that the gravitational effect was a progressive rather than a “peak” event effect.
But discussing these issues with Ian seems more difficult than studying climate science as he doesn’t appear willing to respond to email contacts!
Phil Clark
Thank you, Rog and oldbrew for reblogging my post.
Nikolya Sidorenkov and I have extended this work somewhat further, so that we are now proposing that there is a link between the symmetry of bi-monthly decelerations of the Earth’s rotation rate (that result from the luni-solar tides) with the onset times for moderate to strong El Nino events.
Our current prediction is for a moderate to strong El Nino event starting around July 2019. More of this in the next few months.
What an outstanding work Ian.
Being interested in LAC and LNC and their sublunar points during interval ends, I know for some time that standstill (minor+major) occurs during equinox — with luna very ± near to solstice (ecliptic) position (behavior like a pendulum).
That you achieved to associate the many & various periods & positions with ocean pattern is astonishing work!
Phil Clark,
Please forgive me if I have overlooked any of your emails.
I am not aware of any emails that you have sent me Phil. You are always welcome to contact me and discuss issues related to climate. Unfortunately, I do not have a huge amount of time to spare for a long-term dialogue with people. This has nothing to do with the caliber of the ideas that you want to present. It is primarily because I need to be a good steward of my time.
You can always contact me at my blog site and post comments (I have look at all of the comments on my blog covering the period from 2008 to 2018 and I do not see any posts from you).
I am total agreement with your hypothesis that it most likely not the “peak events” per se that are the underlying cause of El Nino events but rather the progressive change of the lunar tidal/gravitational forces. I think that all the timing of the peak events does is provide a scaffold for the actual underlying progressive mechanism.
oldbrew and Rog, “Typo” is my middle name!
Chaeremon,
You’re greatly under-estimating your own important contributions to this whole investigation.
The pattern that is visible in epoch 5 (1963 to 1994) is completely reversed in epoch 6 (1994 to 2025). All but one (i.e. 2009/10) of the moderate to strong El Nino events are aligned with the times when the sub-point of strongest Perigean New/Full Moon are crossing the Equator.
Chaeremon,
NOTE:
The times when the Perigean/New moons are near lunar standstill correspond to the times when the lunar line-of-apse points at the Sun during the times of Solstice. (e.g. Epoch 5)
The times when the Perigean/New moons crossing the equator correspond to the times when the lunar line-of-apse points at the Sun during the times of Equinoxes. (e.g. Epoch 4 and 6)
If the strength of any hypothesis is in its ability to make predictions that come true, could we please have a prediction of when the next strong El Ninos will be.
Bloke: we already have one…
Our current prediction is for a moderate to strong El Nino event starting around July 2019. More of this in the next few months.
The Moon has a 372 tropical year cycle:
4601 synodic months @ 29.530589 d = 135870.23 days
4973 tropical months @ 27.321582 d = 135870.22 days
4973 – 4601 = 372 tropical years = 31 * 12 = 62 * 6
Half cycle: 372 / 2 = 186 tropical years
30-year base period SST in Nino 3.4 region:
1986-2015 is only level with 1976-2005, possibly trending further downwards.
Interesting plot OB. The 1976-2005 curve shows marginally warmer SSTs than the 1981-2010 does.
1986-2016 has mismatched end points. It appears to show a step change between Dec and Jan that looks ,,, odd.
The magic of 7, beginning with multiples and halfs of synodic Inex corresponding to multiples and halfs of synodic Venus:
Equation: 10Inex = 181Venus; then 81½Venus = 4½Inex + 1m = 7LNC = 7(4.9 x Metonic/5).
Moreover, 1synodic moon + 2siblings + 1LNC = ~same decl° & star & node, doubled – 1LAC = 1Inex -1 = 18Venus.
7 LAC = 766 synodic months (mean value)
2 Inex = 61 draconic years (777 draconic months minus 716 synodic months)
@oldbrew January 3, 2019 at 11:14 am:
What is your LNC, does’t look like 230.3~m = 18.6~ yrs …
Charemon: sorry – typo, amended to LAC (apsidal cycle).
The LNC (nodal cycle) is the beat period of the draconic and tropical years (or months – DM and TM, same result).
Now splitting 7 into 2,3,(8/2),5 [Fibonacci] which comes close to Ian’s 31/62 years factor:
Equation: (3×7)LAC = (2×5)LNC = 7*7Metonic/5 = 2303.0 synodic; int [ceiling] sqroot factors are 2x3x8x8x3x2.
To not overshoot the 186 equinoctial years (31x3x2 = 31x6years wobble) take eclipse cycle 3xInex + 5½xSaros, has life expectancy 2418.000~ years (h/t R.H. van Gent).
Current experiment shows the 2300½ synodic interval has opposite end’s = opposite sign, at same min/max abs declination° (incl. standstill), thus requires ~0° inclination in the middle (eclipse condition) where standstills are the interval’s ends (part of Ian’s thing).
@January 4, 2019 at 9:55 am, results of experiment:
Equation: 5×LNC = 3×31years = 10½×LAC, standstill pattern is: same decl° at both ends and in the middle is the opposite [standstill] decl° [and sign].
Very near eclipse cycle is 11×Inex – 12½×Saros (life expectancy 465 yrs), has same apside at opposite syzygy ends (is also near same solar anomaly); 82½×FMC is obvious.
FWIW, 1150½ moons is short of 1 moon in 49×Metonic/10 and short of 1½ moons in 96×lunar year/s.