Peter Ridd Wins Court Case

Posted: April 16, 2019 by oldbrew in censorship, climate, Legal, News

.
.
As the judge rightly said: “The university has ‘played the man and not the ball’”. One report says ‘the University is considering its legal options’.

NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

image

Dear All,
Excellent news.
My lawyers have told me that the judge handed down his decision and we seem to have won on all counts.
It all happened very quickly and we had no warning , and because I live almost a thousand miles from the court, I was not able to be there. I have still not seen the written judgement and will update you all when I have that information.
Needless to say, I have to thank all 2500 of you, and all the bloggers, and the IPA and my legal team who donated much of their time free for this success. But mostly I want to thank my dearest Cheryl, who quite by chance has been my bestest friend for exactly 40 years today. It just shows what a team effort can achieve.
The next chapter of this saga must now be written by…

View original post 604 more words

Comments
  1. hunterson7 says:

    Thank you for sharing this important excellent news.
    There just may be a way out if this that doesn’t require full immersion in a dark age.

  2. tomo says:

    hunterson7 – oh I dunno – Extinction Rebellion might yet get the lights out … I see they’re invading the SA parliament = low hanging fruits.

  3. Phil Salmon says:

    The extinction rebellion is the inevitable result of the campaign of alarmist misinformation by the all the climate imams. The chickens are coming home to roost. Now a generation of young people have been pointlessly radicalised, and a world of destruction will follow that will make the Notre Dame fire pale by comparison. It will impoverish all of us, pointlessly, all for a pseudoscientific scam.

  4. oldbrew says:

    The Splendid Peter Ridd Court Judgment
    – by Donna Laframboise

    James Cook University took 28 separate actions against Professor Ridd. Each of them, including his termination, has been declared unlawful.

    https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2019/04/22/the-splendid-peter-ridd-court-judgment/

    DL adds – coming Wednesday: more on the Ridd ruling

  5. oldbrew says:

    Peter Ridd vs The Dishonourables
    – by Donna Laframboise

    A powerful bureaucracy bullies, berates, isolates, and intimidates a lone critic.

    https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2019/04/24/peter-ridd-vs-the-dishonourables/
    – – –
    A classic case of ‘your face doesn’t fit here’ – only climate alarmists are welcome.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s