Carbon Is Not A Synonym For Carbon Dioxide

Posted: April 26, 2019 by oldbrew in climate, opinion, propaganda
Tags: ,

.
.
As the author says: Deceit is the name of the game. To further the aims of propagandists with a political agenda, the harmless trace gas carbon dioxide gets branded as ‘pollution’ despite being essential and beneficial to plants, trees etc.

PA Pundits - International

By Dr. Jay Lehr ~

From the very day that Al Gore signed his name to the well known book, An Inconvenient Truth, the general population was told that carbon emissions were going to destroy our planet. Gore, more or less, coined the term “carbon footprint” (while always hiding the enormity of his own footprint). Gore and his cohorts were never actually talking about carbon. They were talking about carbon dioxide.

Initially they understood that most people recognize that they exhale carbon dioxide and plants absorb it in order to live. Not a dark thought. So in a universally evil desire to scare the populace, they seized on using the term carbon as a synonym for carbon dioxide knowing it would conjure up visions of soot, lamp black and coal dust none of which were warm and fuzzy. Carbon is a solid. Carbon dioxide is a colorless, odorless gas…

View original post 361 more words

Comments
  1. Curious George says:

    Carbon is a synonym for diamonds.

  2. Ron Clutz says:

    The deception described above is front and center in the Trudeau-imposed carbon tax.
    Justin Trudeau justified the federal carbon tax this way:

    “The core of putting a price on pollution is exactly that. Making sure that pollution is no longer free. You’re making something you don’t want more expensive. We don’t want pollution, so we’re putting a price on it.”

    https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2019/04/21/call-me-a-carbon-polluter-see-you-in-court/

  3. JB says:

    The carbon-based units on the planet are an infestation.–Ilia, Star Trek, The Movie

  4. Bob Greene says:

    CO2 is not a pollutant. Activists want you to believe it is. Using icky, black, sooty carbon to express CO2 emissions makes the propaganda ploy. Notice they want say “as carbon” because that might allow some doubt.

    Activists get angry when you point out that CO2 is chemically different from cahbahn.

  5. stpaulchuck says:

    right out of Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals

  6. SimonJ says:

    The hint on how to fight back is in the name. Carbon DI Oxide – 2 oxygen to one carbon. The relative atomic masses are even more obvious. So, from now on ALWAYS refer to ‘oxygen pollution and oxygen footprint.
    SimonJ

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s