Ending Obama’s EPA Climate Deception

Posted: May 21, 2019 by oldbrew in climate, Critique, Politics

Calling the essential trace gas carbon dioxide a pollutant was always an absurdity.

PA Pundits - International

By Paul Driessen ~

In December 2009, the Obama Environmental Protection Agency issued its Endangerment Finding (EF) – decreeing that carbon dioxide (CO2) and other “greenhouse gases” (GHGs) endanger the health and welfare of Americans. In the process, EPA ignored the incredible economic, health and welfare benefits of fossil fuels – and the fact that (even at just 0.04% of the atmosphere) carbon dioxide is the miracle molecule that enables plants to grow and makes nearly all live on Earth possible.

EPA turned CO2 into a “dangerous pollutant” and ruled that fossil fuels must be eradicated. The agency subsequently used its EF to justify tens of billions of dollars in climate research, anti-fossil fuel regulations, and wind and solar subsidies; President Obama’s signing of the Paris climate treaty; and proposals to spend trillions of dollars a year on Green New Deal (GND) programs.

And yet, despite multiple demands that this…

View original post 1,244 more words

  1. Gamecock says:

    ‘EPA turned CO2 into a “dangerous pollutant” and ruled that fossil fuels must be eradicated.’

    At that point, the EPA should have been eradicated. Even now, it should go. Some new agency can take over it’s appropriate – limited – functions.

    When a Federal agency goes rogue, the penalty should be death. Any function deemed important can be given to some other agency, or a new one created.

    The DC establishment should fear the people. The people fearing DC is wrong.

  2. oldbrew says:

    Flying to Alaska to complain about fossil fuel use?

    A wildlife spot in Dillingham, Alaska, where Barack Obama touched down as part of a stopover visit intended to highlight the damaging effects of climate change, has been renamed the Bearack Viewing Area in his honour.


  3. oldbrew says:

    EPA Plans to Rewrite Costs and Benefits of Anti-Pollution Rules
    21 May 2019

    – Environmental chief outlines plan in memo to top officials
    – Move seeks consistent analysis of price of environmental rules


  4. ivan says:

    It appears that bloomberg has its collective knickers in a twist because the EPA chief is asking for their rules to be based on real scientific reproducible facts rather than the belief system of the UN Church of Climatology zealots. Logically all people should be applauding this move but the idiots see it as reducing their influence and how much they can get from the public purse.

  5. stpaulchuck says:

    the watermelons and NWO types are in a panic. If the US continues to move away from the climate scams, it’ll leave the Euroweenies and others in a bind for an excuse to mine our treasury for their bank accounts in the Caymans.

    That insane endangerment finding is classic ‘secret science’ and MUST be stopped and reversed. I’d like to see that cabal in federal prison making big rocks into small rocks, but I’ll settle for dismissal for malfeasance.