Germany’s energy policy looks like mission impossible  

Posted: May 28, 2019 by oldbrew in climate, Emissions, Energy, government
Tags:

‘The donkey goes on to the ice until it breaks’ – German proverb [image credit: evwind.es]


Too much coal = severe EU emissions penalties. Too much gas = high dependency on Russian supply. Too much renewable power = grid instability and exorbitant costs. Nuclear is being phased out. The conundrums are mounting for German energy policymakers trying to satisfy the demands of industry, the general public and the eco/climate lobby.

Germany has in recent years polished its “green” image abroad, but the country was only recently forced to admit it will miss a self-imposed 2020 climate target, reports Phys.org.

With Berlin set to miss the next decade’s goals too unless lawmakers take bold action, here are some reasons why carbon reduction has proved tricky even for a wealthy country with an environmentally conscious electorate.

Car-land

The car industry is a pillar of German economic prosperity, juicing export profits and employing 800,000 people.

After a long rearguard action in Brussels against tougher emissions limits on Volkswagen, Daimler or BMW’s fleets, Berlin remains reluctant to follow Britain and France in setting a cutoff date for new combustion engines.

Even the “dieselgate” emission cheating scandal has failed to dent politicians’ cosiness with the car, as leaders warned against measures that could harm ordinary drivers, such as bans from city centres for the most polluting vehicles.

Conservative transport minister Andreas Scheuer recently blocked plans for a nationwide speed limit on the country’s famed Autobahn motorways, which the environment minister had proposed to slash both pollution and road deaths.

Nuclear phase-out

After Japan’s Fukushima disaster in 2011, Angela Merkel took one of the biggest political decisions of her chancellorship in 2011, setting 2022 as the date for all German nuclear plants to be shut down.

Although widely welcomed at the time, especially by the decades-old anti-nuclear movement, the step overturned planning for electricity supply in a power-gobbling economy.

Germany has built up renewable energy sources like wind, solar, bio-fuels and hydroelectric power, accounting for 38 percent of consumption last year and headed for 65 percent by 2030.

But some constant supply is needed to balance out fluctuations in naturally-generated power.

For now, electricity storage remains expensive and a project to build high-voltage energy links from north Germany’s vast offshore wind farms to the industrial south is making only inching progress.

The obstacles have seen Berlin turn to Russian gas as an alternative, as well as razing entire villages to make way for open-cast mining of cheap but highly-polluting brown coal.

Long goodbye to coal

Ministers, industry, experts and unions spent months hammering out a “coal compromise” released early this year, calling for the fuel to be abandoned by 2038.

The four states most vulnerable to the resulting social upheaval—with areas especially dependent on coal mining—will be supported through the transition with 40 billion euros ($45 billion) of public money.

Full report here.
– – –
Talkshop note – the original headline of the report was:
‘Speed bumps on German road to lower emissions’

Comments
  1. Phoenxi44 says:

    Germany is entering a period of serious decline and perhaps ultimately civil unrest. The Greens and centre right/left are committed to policies that will deindustrialise Germany quite rapidly and result in large-scale unemployment and the collapse of Germany’s trade surplus. This all starts when China’s growth, a key part of Germany’s exports, slows as well. Germany cannot change course quickly enough to avoid serious social problems as jobs go and the mass immigration under Merkel then looks increasingly misguided. Germany’s banks are already in big trouble and it has not invested in German infrastructure for decades. Large sections of its population that have no interest in economic realities, and believe they can enjoy their prosperity whilst destroying the foundations of that prosperity.

  2. Reblogged this on Climate- Science and commented:
    Germany dreams of green energy but will wake up in a big nightmare. Freddy is calling…

  3. stpaulchuck says:

    all of Western Europe’s various strategies, including energy is schizophrenic self harming nonsense brought on by an overdose of elitists, many in unelected but powerful positions in the EU and at home, who bought into the UN Agenda 21 as a route to even more power over the people and a channel to funnel billions to their buddies in industry.

    Here in the US we’ve got a similar case of Teh Stupid infecting the country but with 50 states we are able to water it down and to demonstrate the stupidity and extraordinary costs of most so-called ‘green’ energy.

    In Minnesota where I live, the state wrote into law that no new nukes can be built. However, there is a movement afoot to cancel that. The state Senate voted overwhelmingly to allow for license applications for new units. The House is taking its time but a similar bill will be brought to a vote soon. The Karbon Klowns can’t have it both ways. No nukes means higher “pollution” from carbon so they can support reduced Satanic Gases or invoke some ethereal carbon eating spirit to fix it.

    A key to all this is canceling President Carter’s Executive Order forbidding any new fast neutron reactors. We need a dozen or so of them to ‘burn up’ the current mass of stored nuclear waste in the form of spend fuel rods. Some of us keep dinging our politicians to either pass a law or nudge the President to get this going. It is way overdue. In the meantime we waste tens of billions of dollars on unreliable, unnecessary, expensive windmills and solar farms.

  4. gallopingcamel says:

    Stupid government has consequences.

  5. oldbrew says:

    With Berlin set to miss the next decade’s goals too unless lawmakers take bold action

    Like what, exactly? Closing down ever more of the remaining reliable power stations and replacing them with part-time unreliable weather-dependent renewables isn’t ‘bold’, unless you want to risk freezing in the dark more often and damage your economy along the way.

  6. Saighdear says:

    Oh I get it! the Fatherland will kill off the Motor industry by Proxy in the name of ( er em , wots the german name for it? ) to reduce Demand. Einfach! Ausgezeichnet!
    Trouble is:there is no visible Ice – and who is looking ater the poor Donkey meantime?

  7. oldbrew says:

    a wealthy country with an environmentally conscious electorate.

    Conscious maybe, but if they have fallen for the idea that 1 man-made molecule of CO2 per 10000 air molecules in the atmosphere is going to alter the climate, they need to wise up.

  8. Seems very few are talking about molten salt Thorium reactors which are completely safe and have practically no waste. Will the Chinese who promised to have the first operating by 2021 be ahead of everyone although I have read the Indian government is also advanced.

  9. ivan says:

    At least the German car manufacturers read the writing on the wall and moved most of their manufacturing out of the country to where power wouldn’t be a big problem. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they were prepared to move their German offices overseas as well if push comes to shove.

    All the stupid leftist green-wash is doing is hurting the German people, something I see as ending well for those that have drunk the kool-aide provided by the UN Church of Climatology.

  10. ivan says:

    That should have been something I see as not ending well for

  11. gallopingcamel says:

    @cementafriend,

    Here in the USA major companies are scared to build nuclear reactors which now cost $6 per Watt compared to $2 per Watt for an identical reactor constructed in the PRC.

    The Greenies have cowed power companies into believing that even if they build a nuclear reactor they won’t be allowed to switch it on:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoreham_Nuclear_Power_Plant

    Thus it seems likely that LFTRs will be built in Russia, India, the Czech Republic and Canada rather than in the USA.

    I would like to be proved wrong given how SMRs (Small Modular Reactors) could harden our grid against EMP attacks and Carrington events.