Ocasio-Cortez’s Tornado Tweet Versus Scientific Facts

Posted: May 31, 2019 by oldbrew in alarmism, climate, Incompetence

Another own goal by would-be climate crusaders.

PA Pundits - International

From the team at CFACT ~

During a recent tornado warning for Washington DC, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) issued a tweet claiming the tornado warning illustrated that “climate change is real y’all.” Ocasio-Cortez’s tweet revealed just how little she knows about climate change.

Ocasio-Cortez wrote in her tweet, “we DO know that tornadoes HAVE been changing. They are no longer being limited to the Great Plains, and are shifting to other regions of the country.”

If Ocasio-Cortez knew American history, she would know that tornadoes have never been “limited to the Great Plains.” If she knew her American history, she would have known that a tornado that touched down as part of an intense storm in 1814 prevented the British from doing worse damage to our Washington DC when the redcoats sacked our nation’s capital during the War of 1812. An excellent historical narrative published by The Vintage News observes…

View original post 149 more words

  1. ivan says:

    So we now have the ignorant AO-C once again displaying her total lack of schooling. Why the sayings of such stupid people get such press exposure especially when it can be shown their sayings are nonsense is beyond me as is the fact that some of the people believe it.

  2. Hey Tallbloke, I lost your email. You might like the video series I am doing now – here is a really good set:

    That number of links will likely either auto-trash or spam, so I’ll reply again with just a link to my Youtube.

  3. Looks like my comment made it through…great! If you would like to OP any of these videos, please do! Always available for a chat etc.

  4. Phoenix44 says:

    She doesn’t care about facts, she knows climate change is real and so she knows bad weathery things are caused by it. The irony is that this is the reverse of science: a conclusion is reached first, then evidence is found to support it and that evidence does not have to be real or true or actually supportive of the conclusion, just to vaguely existing exist.

    It is the result of decades of pseudo-science in areas such as sociology and psychology which have produced nonsensical bias-driven “evidence”.

  5. tom0mason says:

    Why anyone is listening to this person is beyond me. All she does is add hysterics to the nonsense the iPeeSeeSeers believe.
    As the world cools, the gullibles like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her followers are looking increasingly foolish.

  6. stpaulchuck says:

    Ms. Occasionally-Conscious, the icon of the modern Dhimmeroid Party