Voyager 2’s trip to interstellar space deepens some mysteries beyond our solar system

Posted: November 6, 2019 by oldbrew in data, Electro-magnetism, exploration, research, Travel
Tags: ,

The two Voyager space probes, launched in 1977, are still delivering tales of the unexpected.

The boundary region between the sun’s sphere of influence and the broader Milky Way galaxy is complicated indeed.

Humanity’s second taste of interstellar space may have raised more questions than it answered, writes Mike Wall @

NASA’s Voyager 2 spacecraft popped free of the heliosphere — the huge bubble of charged particles that the sun blows around itself — on Nov. 5, 2018, more than six years after the probe’s pioneering twin, Voyager 1, did the same.

The mission team has now had some time to take stock of Voyager 2’s exit, which occurred in the heliosphere’s southern hemisphere (as opposed to Voyager 1, which departed in the northern hemisphere).

In a series of five papers published online today (Nov. 4) in the journal Nature Astronomy, the researchers reported the measurements made by the probe as it entered interstellar space.

These data are full of surprises. For example, Voyager 2 traversed the heliopause — the boundary between the heliosphere and interstellar space — when the probe was 119 astronomical units (AU) from the sun. (One AU is the average Earth-sun distance, which is about 93 million miles, or 150 million kilometers.) Voyager 1 made the crossing at nearly the same distance, 121.6 AU.

This consistency is “very strange, in the sense that one [Voyager 2’s crossing] occurred at the solar minimum, when the solar activity is the least, and the other one occurred at the solar maximum,” Stamatios Krimigis, lead author of one of the new Voyager 2 papers, said during a teleconference with reporters last week, referring to the sun’s 11-year activity cycle.

“If we take our models at face value, we expected that there would be, indeed, a difference,” added Krimigis, who’s based at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, and the Office of Space Research and Technology at the Academy of Athens in Greece.

Voyager project scientist Ed Stone, of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, also emphasized the dynamism of the solar bubble. “The heliosphere itself is breathing in and out,” he said during the same teleconference.

In addition to the large-scale expansion and contraction noted by Krimigis, Stone said, there are shorter-term heliospheric perturbations caused by coronal mass ejections, powerful explosions that blast huge amounts of solar plasma out into space.

“It’s a very complicated interaction that’s going on that we’re studying,” said Stone, who led one of the new studies and co-authored another one.

Voyager 2’s measurements of the interstellar magnetic field are also intriguing. Before Voyager 1’s 2012 crossing, the team expected to see significant differences in the direction of the magnetic field outside the heliosphere compared to the one inside, said Leonard Burlaga of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.

But Voyager 1 found that the interstellar field was largely aligned with the heliospheric field — and so did Voyager 2, we learned today. So this appears to be a real phenomenon, not some fluky coincidence.

“We have to come to some understanding of why the magnetic field doesn’t change,” Burlaga, the lead author of one of the new Nature Astronomy papers and a co-author on another one, said in the telecon.

There must be some process causing the alignment, he added, and “that process is simply not understood.”

Then there’s the “leakage” observed by both spacecraft. Voyager 1 detected interstellar particles on two separate occasions as it neared the heliopause, and the mission team has attributed that finding to two intruding “interstellar flux tubes.”

But Voyager 2’s experience was quite the opposite: The probe detected some solar particles for a while after it left the heliosphere.

The difference may have something to do with heliospheric geometry, given that Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 left the solar bubble in very different places. “But we don’t really know the answer to that,” Krimigis said.

There are other differences reported by the two probes as well.

Full article here.

  1. […] über Voyager 2’s trip to interstellar space deepens some mysteries beyond our solar system — Tallblok… […]

  2. JB says:

    “There must be some process causing the alignment, he added, and ‘that process is simply not understood.'”

    Yes, it is understood. Just not by them because they are using the wrong model of galaxies. Halton Arp and Hannes Alfvén put us on the right track decades ago. Some ideas, like superstitution refuse to die.

  3. oldbrew says:

    Electricity and magnetism are manifestations of a single underlying electromagnetic force. Electromagnetism is a branch of physical science that describes the interactions of electricity and magnetism, both as separate phenomena and as a singular electromagnetic force. A magnetic field is created by a moving electric current [bold added]

    They talk a lot about magnetism but much less about electricity.

  4. ivan says:

    We should at least congratulate them for being honest and saying they don’t know unlike so called climate scientists who never admit they haven’t a clue about the climate.

    We should also congratulate the engineers that built both of the Voyager space probes – that was real engineering.

  5. oldbrew says:

    “The heliosphere itself is breathing in and out”

    Not heard that one before 🙂

  6. Yes Ivan! Oldbrew electricity and magnetism are engineering subjects. What do you think electrical engineers experience? Scientists just play around with theory. Nearly all have no actual practical experience. As Ivan says those calling themselves climate scientists” have no understanding, have no real practical experience and are not honest about their knowledge.The same goes for those wasting money and writing rubbish about “black” holes in space and the big bang. What sort of logic says that in some instance the universe appeared from a point source out of nothing and huge amount of matter is disappearing in some hole which does not emit any energy. (note some “holes” emit radiowaves but then they are not “black holes” as defined). Just saw an interesting mathematical analysis which is said to show that Einstein’s theory of relativity is wrong and that Einstein himself was not certain about it in his older days.

  7. oldbrew says:

    In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded. — Terry Pratchett

  8. Damian says:

    Cementafriend, Einstein and Oppenheimer published papers falsifying Blackholes and, by extension, star formation.
    If a rotating disk of dust and stuff collapses it retains its angular momentum and would spin faster until it reached a point where the centripetal action would overwhelm the force of gravity.
    The electromagnetic force is trillions of times stronger than gravity and, as the disc collapses it would reach a point where the EM force would overcome gravity and the disc would cease to collapse.
    This also means nuclear fusion could never be attained I think?

  9. Daniel says:

    “sun’s sphere of influence” ?
    Héliopause = 120 UA
    Nuage de Oort de 20 000 à 100 000 UA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s