Munich Climate Conference 2019

Posted: December 25, 2019 by oldbrew in climate, research

.
.
Open-minded independent scientists, not wedded to theories of man-made climate warming by minor trace gases, present some of their ideas.

Science Matters

Antifa thugs outside Munich Conference Center.

Thanks to Andreas Müller for writing at his blog hintermbusch on four key presentations at the EIKE Climate Conference on Nov. 23, 2019. As many have read, eco-terrorists forced the sessions out of the scheduled venue, but the gatherings went on elsewhere.  So much for dialogue in search of scientific truth. Here are some excerpts in italics with my bolds to encourage readers to read his informative report. (link in red above).

In this blog post, I summarize these lectures and add links to the video clips for you to follow the lectures on your own and in full detail (Only the first talk was in German and is not easily accessible for most of the international public).

Christian Schlüchter, Switzerland

Prof. em. Christian Schlüchter is a geologist and has studied the glaciers of the Alps in great detail. He reports the findings of…

View original post 878 more words

Comments
  1. […] über Munich Climate Conference 2019 — Tallbloke’s Talkshop […]

  2. Curious George says:

    It is so nice to see brave young democrats who don’t dare to show their faces. Are they planning a Kristallnacht? They should learn what happened to their SA predecessors.

  3. oldbrew says:

    UN’s Madrid Climate Meetings Produce Net-Zero Benefits

    ‘For scale perspective, consider that hydrocarbons (oil, natural gas and coal) provide about 84% of global energy, while wind and solar combined account for only a piddling 2%.

    Also, keep in mind that total world energy use rose 50% over the past two decades, an amount equal to adding two entire United States’ worth of new and growing demand.

    Mark Mills at the Manhattan Institute estimates that in order to completely replace today’s hydrocarbons, global renewable energy production would have to increase by at least 90-fold. For context: it took a half-century for global oil and gas production to expand by 10-fold.’

    https://www.newsmax.com/larrybell/madrid-ipcc-maldives-sea-levels/2019/12/23/id/947056/

  4. oldbrew says:

    Geologist: ‘The CO2 scare is proving false – it’s time for some climate sense’ – UN seeks ‘fake answer to invented problem’ of ‘climate emergency’
    – – –
    Geologist Viv Forbes: “The carbon dioxide scare is proving false – it’s time for some climate sense. Human activity can never control atmospheric CO2 or global temperature. Much bigger forces are at work – solar system cycles, earth orbital changes, volcanic activity (especially on the sea floor), El Nino episodes, declining magnetic field and magnetic pole reversals, variable cosmic rays and cloud cover, and absorption/expulsion of CO2 by the mighty oceans. Geological records show that today’s CO2 levels are very low – so low that plants grow slower and need more water.

    Moreover, the ice core records from Antarctica and Greenland show clearly that atmospheric temperature always rises before CO2 levels rise. So rising CO2 is the effect of rising temperature not the cause. Warming oceans are like warming beer – they both expel bubbles of CO2 into the atmosphere. When oceans cool, they take it back.” …

    “Alarmism over climate is the great gravy train for academics, bureaucrats, speculators, globalists and politicians seeking excuses for more power and more taxes. ‘Climate emergency’ is an exercise in global politics, not science. The plan is to scare us into transferring money and power from western nations to the UN – a fake answer to an invented problem.”

    https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/12/23/geologist-the-co2-scare-is-proving-false-its-time-for-some-climate-sense-un-seeks-fake-answer-to-invented-problem-of-climate-emergency/

  5. stpaulchuck says:

    oldbrew says:
    December 26, 2019 at 4:20 pm
    ————-
    all of what Ms. Forbes said is truth and fact, yet we are talking about rent seekers and religious believers of the Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming From Satanic Gases. Neither of whom want to let it be known that CAGW is a scam.
    ————-
    “Meanwhile, conservatives are said to have rejected science if they won’t believe that taxes control the weather.” from moonbattery.com