.
.
People will be more than sorry if they allow these fanatics to have their own way.
By David Wojick, Ph.D. ~
Ever since she splashed into view I have wondered about Greta Thunberg’s reasoning. Her quoted statements, blasting the world for not doing the impossible, have given no clue where she is coming from.
Now, thanks to some detailed published statements of hers, from the World Economic Forum in Davos, I have my answer. It turns out she is hotly embracing not one, but two, howling fallacies. No wonder she sounds nuts.
To begin with, she cites the IPCC report on climate change from 2018, which claims we have only a few years left to act if there’s a 67% chance of keeping the global temperature rise from now to below 0.5 degrees C. (She, like everyone else, talks about a rise of 1.5 degrees, but the IPCC says that 1.0 degrees has already happened, which she knows.) If she said a half a…
View original post 617 more words
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
😂😁😀😁😂
We should not lose sight of the fact that all her pronouncements are written for her by her father and some Indian eco-nut. If she doesn’t have a script to read from she is lost for words.
She need to go to school and learn some real science and economics rather than just parrot words given to her.
‘In logic this is called argument by assertion.’
Or ‘No true Scotsman’ fallacy.
“THE science” is universal truth. You can’t oppose it.
Greta Buffoonberg is nothing more than a trained parrot. Her mom and pop filled her with tons (‘tonnes’ for our Brit cousins *grin*) of nonsense and then sent her out to terrorize the world with predictions of total eco-system collapse from temperatures we’ve had before that in fact benefited everyone and everything.
As for all these predictions, here’s the bottom line from the IPCC itself!
———-
“The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” – IPCC TAR WG1, Working Group I: The Scientific Basis
———-
These idiot predictive computer models are about as accurate and reliable as the predictive models of stock market movement.