We need health warning labels on points of sale of fossil fuels – The BMJ

Posted: April 1, 2020 by oldbrew in alarmism, climate, Energy, government, pollution, propaganda, Travel
Tags: ,


Schemes to ramp up climate alarm propaganda with ‘warming’ [sic] labels are already in the pipeline e.g. in Sweden. They try to claim a health risk from the warmer weather they feel sure lies ahead, while pointing the finger at humans for this supposed problem and equating it to tobacco smoking. If the pollution doesn’t get you, the climate emergency will…type of thing. Crude stuff loosely based on dodgy climate models.
– – –
Mike Gill and colleagues explain how the implementation of of fossil fuel labelling could have a significant impact on the awareness of climate change, says The British Medical Journal blog. This article is part of The BMJ’s Health in the Anthropocene collection.

The use of fossil fuels should be rapidly reduced to keep the global mean temperature increase to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels—a core goal of the Paris Agreement on climate change.

Emphasising the risks to health of fossil fuel use, now and in the future, could motivate action.

We propose a low cost, scalable intervention to facilitate change in individuals’ and society’s views and behaviour: warning labels at points of purchase of fossil energy or services dependent on large amounts of fossil fuel, for example at petrol stations, on energy bills, and on airline tickets. They should state clearly that continuing to burn fossil fuels worsens the climate emergency, with major projected health impacts increasing over time.

Since 1969, increasing numbers of countries have required cigarette packets to carry health warnings. 118 countries now require cigarette packets to include graphic pictures alongside stark health warnings.

These warnings can change attitudes and behaviour, providing a critical contribution to effective tobacco control policy. Smoking is no longer viewed as a normal lifestyle choice, but as an addiction which harms the individual and those around them through exposure to second-hand smoke.

Fossil fuel use also harms others through ambient air pollution that accounts for about 3.5 million premature deaths per year, as well as through climate change, which increasingly threatens the health of current and future generations.

In many countries, fossil fuel use is already the subject of government intervention, through fuel and carbon taxes, vehicle emissions standards, and other legislation, but these are insufficient to prevent dangerous climate change and do not reflect the full economic costs of burning fossil fuels.

Even if the nationally determined contributions for greenhouse gas emission reductions in the Paris Agreement are implemented, the global mean temperature increase is likely to exceed 3°C by the end of the century. For this reason there is growing acceptance that the world faces a climate emergency demanding urgent action at scale.

Nevertheless, vested interests continue to create doubt about the robustness of climate science, a cause of the inadequate scale and perceived urgency of investments in renewables. Other barriers to shifting consumer behaviours towards zero-carbon options include low awareness, habit, perceived cost, inconvenience, and “psychological distance”—the perception that the issue affects other people, places, or times, or is uncertain.

Warning labels connect the abstract threat of the climate emergency with the use of fossil fuels in the here and now, drawing attention to the true cost of fossil fuels (the externalities), pictorially or quantitatively.

They sensitise people to the consequences of their actions, representing nudges, designed to encourage users to choose alternatives to fossil fuels, thus increasing demand for zero-carbon renewable energy.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. oldbrew says:

    Their message for the UK:

    There is an opportunity for national and local governments to implement labelling of fossil fuels in the run-up to COP26 in Glasgow, and in particular for the UK Government, as the host of the COP, to show leadership, as part of a package of measures to accelerate progress on getting to ‘Net Zero’ emissions.

  2. Chaswarnertoo says:

    See the electric Mirages on Notalotof people…

  3. John Murray says:

    With diesel, locally, retailing at 111.9 versus 129.9 a month ago, and the price per barrel dropping down to near zero (and in one case under zero), and the Russians and Saudis’ opening the taps wide while demand drops (to drive the USA frackers out of business), things look like getting really interesting soon.

  4. oldbrew says:

    We need health warning labels…on climate alarm propaganda.

  5. Phoenix44 says:

    I wholeheartdly support it. You have to be a peculair type of person to think the warnings on fag packets have any effect frankly, other than making people completely ignore them. So go ahead! The more people bang on about something that doesn’t happen the enxt day, the more people will come to ignore it.

  6. JB says:

    Worthy of April Fools Day….

    I don’t know anyone who pays the least attention to California’s cancer warning labels.Most of the time they only provoke the question: How do they know this?

    People ought to know by now that propaganda is an essential element of mass movements, while fear and scaremongering are their daily fare.

  7. ivan says:

    These people are supposed to be doctors and should know that the human body can stand more than a 2°C increase in temperature.

    As it stand the article is nothing more than political posturing to try to cover up their lack of preparedness over the virus outbreak.

  8. stpaulchuck says:

    ————–
    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.” – H.L. Menken

  9. It seems that most alarmists are ignorant of paleoclimates wherein it was a much warmer, equable, and greener earth.

  10. Gamecock says:

    Insufficient, Phoenix44. The labels must have large lettering saying “This message from British Medical Journal.” They will quickly become the joke they deserve to be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s