Rising CO2 causes more than a climate crisis—it may directly harm our ability to think, claim researchers

Posted: April 21, 2020 by oldbrew in alarmism, climate, predictions, research
Tags: ,


A climate classic from the University of Boulder. Has ‘excess’ CO2 already got to them? Prepare to enter the twilight zone… 🤪
– – –
As the 21st century progresses, rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations will cause urban and indoor levels of the gas to increase, and that may significantly reduce our basic decision-making ability and complex strategic thinking, according to a new CU Boulder-led study.

By the end of the century, people could be exposed to indoor CO2 levels up to 1400 parts per million—more than three times today’s outdoor levels, and well beyond what humans have ever experienced, reports Phys.org.

“It’s amazing how high CO2 levels get in enclosed spaces,” said Kris Karnauskas, CIRES Fellow, associate professor at CU Boulder and lead author of the new study published today in the AGU journal GeoHealth. “It affects everybody—from little kids packed into classrooms to scientists, business people and decision makers to regular folks in their houses and apartments.”

Shelly Miller, professor in CU Boulder’s school of engineering and coauthor adds that “building ventilation typically modulates CO2 levels in buildings, but there are situations when there are too many people and not enough fresh air to dilute the CO2.” CO2 can also build up in poorly ventilated spaces over longer periods of time, such as overnight while sleeping in bedrooms, she said.

Put simply, when we breathe air with high CO2 levels, the CO2 levels in our blood rise, reducing the amount of oxygen that reaches our brains. Studies show that this can increase sleepiness and anxiety, and impair cognitive function.

We all know the feeling: Sit too long in a stuffy, crowded lecture hall or conference room and many of us begin to feel drowsy or dull. In general, CO2 concentrations are higher indoors than outdoors, the authors wrote. And outdoor CO2 in urban areas is higher than in pristine locations.

The CO2 concentrations in buildings are a result of both the gas that is otherwise in equilibrium with the outdoors, but also the CO2 generated by building occupants as they exhale.

Atmospheric CO2 levels have been rising since the Industrial Revolution, reaching a 414 ppm peak at NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii in 2019.

In the ongoing scenario in which people on Earth do not reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts outdoor CO2 levels could climb to 930 ppm by 2100. And urban areas typically have around 100 ppm CO2 higher than this background.

Karnauskas and his colleagues developed a comprehensive approach that considers predicted future outdoor CO2 concentrations and the impact of localized urban emissions, a model of the relationship between indoor and outdoor CO2 levels and the impact on human cognition. They found that if the outdoor CO2 concentrations do rise to 930 ppm, that would nudge the indoor concentrations to a harmful level of 1400 ppm.

“At this level, some studies have demonstrated compelling evidence for significant cognitive impairment,” said Anna Schapiro, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania and a coauthor on the study.

“Though the literature contains some conflicting findings and much more research is needed, it appears that high level cognitive domains like decision-making and planning are especially susceptible to increasing CO2 concentrations.”

In fact, at 1400 ppm, CO2 concentrations may cut our basic decision-making ability by 25 percent, and complex strategic thinking by around 50 percent, the authors found.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. JB says:

    Sounds like Karnauskas has been spending too much time in enclosed spaces with his colleagues….

  2. Kip Hansen says:

    These reseachers fail to keep up with the literature on CO2 levels.

    Acute Exposure to Low-to-Moderate Carbon Dioxide Levels and Submariner Decision Making.

    “METHODS: Using a subject-blinded balanced design, 36 submarine-qualified sailors were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 CO2 exposure conditions (600, 2500, or 15,000 ppm). After a 45-min atmospheric acclimation period, participants completed an 80-min computer-administered SMS test as a measure of decision making.

    RESULTS: There were no significant differences for any of the nine SMS measures of decision making between the CO2 exposure conditions.

    DISCUSSION: In contrast to recent research demonstrating cognitive deficits on the SMS test in students and professional-grade office workers, we were unable to replicate this effect in a submariner population-even with acute CO2 exposures more than an order of magnitude greater than those used in previous studies that demonstrated such effects.Rodeheffer CD, Chabal S, Clarke JM, Fothergill DM. Acute exposure to low-to-moderate carbon dioxide levels and submariner decision making. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(6):520-525.”

    There are valid reasons for improving air quality in classroom, offices and lecture halls — and valid reasons for improving the working and learning environments in general (including professors that don’t put students to sleep). But “CO2 makes you stupid” is not one of them.

  3. ren says:

    Polish doctors are starting plasma therapy from people who have recovered from Covid-19 next week. 600 ml of plasma can be taken from one person at a time. One 200 ml dose is enough for therapy. Plasma alone (without whole blood) can be collected every two weeks. To collect plasma, you must wait two weeks after the last negative CoV-2 test.

  4. Curious George says:

    That’s how vampires developed. [@ren]

  5. oldbrew says:

    Plants thrive in real greenhouses at 1300 ppm of CO2.
    http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/00-077.htm#suppl

    Any more and the growers might start losing their minds…’research suggests’ 😎

  6. Ian Dempster says:

    How people can provide rubbish such as this is beyond me. According to the Health and Safety executive EH40 list, Carbon Dioxide can increase up to 5000 ppm in an 8 hour work period and up to 15000 ppm for a 15 minute period.

    Regards

    Ian

  7. Zoe Phin says:

    LOL
    What clowns!

    Now onto something new:

    The Strange Case of Mimas

    Enjoy 🙂

  8. oldbrew says:

    IPCC Politics and Solar Variability
    1 day ago April 20, 2020
    By Andy May

    This post is about an important new paper by Nicola Scafetta, Richard Willson, Jae Lee and Dong Wu (Scafetta, Willson and Lee, et al. 2019) on the ACRIM versus PMOD total solar irradiance (TSI) composite debate that has been raging for over 20 years. ACRIM stands for Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor, these instruments recorded solar irradiance from space for many years.
    . . .
    The IPCC appears to have hit a dead end. They have been unable to find any observational evidence that humans contribute to climate change, much less measure the human impact on climate. They are reduced to creating models of climate and measuring the difference between models that include human forcings and those that do not.

    IPCC Politics and Solar Variability


    – – –
    They will just try to cover up their embarrassment by SHOUTING LOUDER.

  9. hunterson7 says:

    Pot is legal in Colorado. Combine that with the mental deterioration caused by climate obsession, and you can expect a lot more idiocratic academic crap like this paper.

  10. stpaulchuck says:

    the average percentage of oxygen at STP is around 21% which is 210,000 PPM. So then a CO2 rise from 400 ppm which is about 0.19% OF the level of oxygen alone, to 1400 ppm will raise the CO2 level to 0.66% of the level of O2 in the air. I’m not sure how that’s supposed to make us impaired. The CO2 is not displacing the O2, it is adding to the total atmosphere so O2 level remains the same but the per unit volume of intake of ‘air’ will have at most about two-thirds of a per cent less oxygen. As we will be breathing thicker air due to the increased total pressure our O2 ratio may not change enough to note.

    Humans work and live at altitudes of 10,000 feet or more quite easily (when raised there or get acclimated). Cabin pressure on aircraft is roughly 8,000 feet and aircrew do just fine. I call BS on this study. Just another lame attempt to demonize a trace gas for political purposes.

  11. oldbrew says:

    UK weather forecast: Britain could be hotter than Ibiza with mercury set to hit 24C amid coronavirus lockdown
    2 hours ago

    Met Office forecaster said the expected warm weather – which will see the UK several degrees hotter than the 19C temperatures of Ibiza – is due to a large area of high pressure to the north of England making the days clear and bright.
    [bold added]
    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/uk-weather-forecast-april-london-coronavirus-a4420636.html
    – – –
    Nothing to do with trace gases from fuel use, of course.

  12. Paul Vaughan says:

    We should set up a borg cube and direct the left as follows: THERE YOU GO.

  13. oldbrew says:

    Systemic Misuse of Scenarios in Climate Research and Assessment
    63 Pages Posted:
    Roger Pielke
    University of Colorado Boulder

    Justin Ritchie
    University of British Columbia

    Date Written: April 21, 2020

    Abstract

    Climate science research and assessments have misused scenarios for more than a decade. Symptoms of this misuse include the treatment of an unrealistic, extreme scenario as the world’s most likely future in the absence of climate policy and the illogical comparison of climate projections across inconsistent global development trajectories. Reasons why this misuse arose include (a) competing demands for scenarios from users in diverse academic disciplines that ultimately conflated exploratory and policy relevant pathways, (b) the evolving role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – which effectively extended its mandate from literature assessment to literature coordination, (c) unforeseen consequences of employing a nuanced temporary approach to scenario development, (d) maintaining research practices that normalize careless use of scenarios in a vacuum of plausibility, and (e) the inherent complexity and technicality of scenarios in model-based research and in support of policy. As a consequence, the climate research community is presently off-track. Attempts to address scenario misuse within the community have thus far not worked. The result has been the widespread production of myopic or misleading perspectives on future climate change and climate policy. Until reform is implemented, we can expect the production of such perspectives to continue. However, because many aspects of climate change discourse are contingent on scenarios, there is considerable momentum that will make such a course correction difficult and contested – even as efforts to improve scenarios have informed research that will be included in the IPCC 6th Assessment.
    [bold added]
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3581777
    – – –
    ‘off-track’ – that’s putting it mildly.

    ‘misused scenarios for more than a decade’ – cheap headline chasers.

    ‘myopic or misleading perspectives’ – no kidding.

  14. Paul Vaughan says:

    We’re right to physically distance from left-rules D-bait.

    Freedom: The right loves the Chinese people.
    Lockdown: The left loves the Chinese government.

    Just due contrast to build con trust.

  15. Coeur de Lion says:

    My chum the CO of a ballistic missile submarine flourishes at c. 4000ppm and still speaks four languages.