UK Supreme Court hears climate case on Heathrow airport expansion

Posted: October 10, 2020 by oldbrew in Legal, News, Travel

A Friends of the Earth lawyer claimed, re. the ruling now being challenged: “It is the first case that has ruled that government plans for a massive infrastructure project are unlawful on the basis of the Paris Agreement,” she said. But that gives a misleading impression of the verdict, as this report shows. Big infrastructure projects haven’t been declared illegal.
– – –
Heathrow Airport is challenging a ruling that quashed plans to build a third runway earlier this year, based on the UK commitment to the Paris Agreement, says Climate Home News.

Heathrow appeared in front of the UK Supreme Court this week in a bid to overturn a judgment that blocked Europe’s busiest airport from expanding.

In February, campaigners claimed a historic victory in the Court of Appeal, which quashed plans for a third runway at Heathrow on climate grounds. The case was brought by litigation charity Plan B and campaign group Friends of the Earth.

Three appeal judges ruled that government approval of the expansion plan was unlawful because, among other reasons, it failed to consider the Paris Agreement on climate change.

To pursue the project, the transport secretary would have to review how it could fit with the country’s climate commitments. The transport department accepted the ruling and said it would not appeal.

In a two-day virtual sitting of the Supreme Court this week, Heathrow argued the government was not legally required to consider the Paris Agreement.

At the same time, the airport owners claimed a third runway was compatible with Paris, so a government review would ultimately conclude it could go ahead.

According to the UK Committee on Climate Change, aviation is likely to be the UK’s highest emitting sector by 2050, as it is hard to decarbonise. Heathrow currently emits around 19 million tonnes of CO2 a year, more than half of UK aviation emissions.

A third runway would add a projected 9 million tonnes to the airport’s total annual CO2 output.

A spokesperson for Heathrow airport said: “Heathrow will ensure the expansion project is compliant with the UK’s climate change obligations, including under the Paris Climate Agreement, as part of our plans to reach net-zero carbon. We fully expect to be held to account by the government through the planning process.”

Continued here.

[The verdict is expected in January.]

  1. Phoenix44 says:

    The real problem is that the government chose not to appeal. It was their National Policy Statement that was supposedly at fault, but they had taken plenty of advice that said the NPS did not need to consider Paris. The High Court also took the same view. And Heathrow expansion will have to demonstrate how it meets environmental commitments through planning application stages so can be held to whatever standards need apply. Yet despite all that, Boris didn’t want to appeal. It demonstrates clearly that this government will not allow Heathrow expansion and will prevent increases in flying. We are all going to have holiday in Cornwall now – all 67 million of us.

  2. oldbrew says:

    Thiefrow Heathrow is not the only flight option…

    Revealed: every UK airport has plans to expand

    Every major commercial UK airport has plans to expand, with many hoping to double passenger numbers by 2030, research by Air Quality News can reveal.

  3. hunterson7 says:

    If the XR culture continues it’s metastatic growth, airports will be shrinking, not growing, by 2030.

  4. oldbrew says:

    Bristol Airport support ‘incompatible’ with Weca plan
    Published 2 hours ago

    A councillor has urged the West of England Combined Authority (Weca) to abandon its support of Bristol Airport’s planned expansion.

    Sarah Warren, of Bath and North East Somerset Council, said backing the project was “incompatible” with Weca’s declaration of a climate emergency.

    The combined authority insists action to tackle climate change is embedded in everything it does.

    Bristol Airport has appealed the decision to reject its expansion plans.
    – – –
    It seems local authorities can’t have it both ways: ‘climate emergencies’ AND bigger airports.

    Bad luck 😆
    = = =
    Meanwhile, XR goons get the bum’s rush at Smithfield meat market in London.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s