‘Giant arc’ stretching 3.3 billion light-years across the cosmos shouldn’t exist

Posted: June 22, 2021 by oldbrew in Astronomy, Astrophysics, Celestial Mechanics, research

Milky_Way

The Milky Way in the night sky over Black Rock Desert, Nevada [image credit: Steve Jurvetson / Wikipedia]

Not only that, but it’s likely ‘rotating on a scale never seen before’, says Phys.org. ‘How the angular momentum responsible for the rotation is generated in a cosmological context is one of the key unsolved problems of cosmology.’
– – –
How big is too big? – asks Space.com.

A newly discovered crescent of galaxies spanning 3.3 billion light-years is among the largest known structures in the universe and challenges some of astronomers’ most basic assumptions about the cosmos.

The epic arrangement, called the Giant Arc, consists of galaxies, galactic clusters, and lots of gas and dust.

It is located 9.2 billion light-years away and stretches across roughly a 15th of the observable universe.

Its discovery was “serendipitous,” Alexia Lopez, a doctoral candidate in cosmology at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) in the U.K., told Live Science.

Lopez was assembling maps of objects in the night sky using the light from about 120,000 quasars — distant bright cores of galaxies where supermassive black holes are consuming material and spewing out energy.

As this light passes through matter between us and the quasars, it is absorbed by different elements, leaving telltale traces that can give researchers important information.

In particular, Lopez used marks left by magnesium to determine the distance to the intervening gas and dust, as well as the material’s position in the night sky.

In this way, the quasars act “like spotlights in a dark room, illuminating this intervening matter,” Lopez said.

In the midst of the cosmic maps, a structure began to emerge. “It was sort of a hint of a big arc,” Lopez said. “I remember going to Roger [Clowes] and saying ‘Oh, look at this.'”

Clowes, her doctoral adviser at UCLan, suggested further analysis to ensure it wasn’t some chance alignment or a trick of the data. After doing two different statistical tests, the researchers determined that there was less than a 0.0003% probability the Giant Arc wasn’t real.

They presented their results on June 7 at the 238th virtual meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

But the finding, which will take its place in the list of biggest things in the cosmos, undermines a bedrock expectation about the universe. Astronomers have long adhered to what’s known as the cosmological principle, which states that, at the largest scales, matter is more or less evenly distributed throughout space.

The Giant Arc bigger than other enormous assemblies, such as the Sloan Great Wall and the South Pole Wall, each of which are dwarfed by even larger cosmic features.

“There have been a number of large-scale structures discovered over the years,” Clowes told Live Science. “They’re so large, you wonder if they’re compatible with the cosmological principle.”

The fact that such colossal entities have clumped together in particular corners of the cosmos indicates that perhaps material isn’t distributed evenly around the universe.

But the current standard model of the universe is founded on the cosmological principle, Lopez added. “If we’re finding it not to be true, maybe we need to start looking at a different set of theories or rules.”

Full article here.

Comments
  1. Gamecock says:

    ‘Alexia Lopez, a doctoral candidate in cosmology’

    Grrr. Junk science red flag. Credential inflation – she is a graduate student, she has not earned the right to have ‘doctor’ associated with her name.

    Second junk science red flag:

    ‘By using a sophisticated mapping method, the observed galaxy distribution was segmented into filaments.’

    “What have we here, laddie? A sophisticated mapping method? Sophisticated, everybody!”

    Two instances of trying to manufacture credibility.

  2. Curious George says:

    This post combines two sources which seem to have nothing in common, other than that both handle astrophysics on very large scales.

  3. oldbrew says:

    This is probably going to make things worse…

    Does the cosmological principle exist in the rotating Universe?
    L. M. Chechin (2017)

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0202289317040065

  4. […] ‘Giant arc’ stretching 3.3 billion light-years across the cosmos shouldn’t exist […]

  5. pochas94 says:

    I sincerely hope, but suspect otherwise, that embedded magnetic fields are considered as they effect distribution of matter. These fields self organize and drag plasma around with them, potentially affecting the structure of galaxies and their distribution in space. They result in the spiral arms of galaxies, and the fact that the galactic disks exhibit a rigidity that needs an explanation, along with the purported “dark matter” gravitational effects.

  6. jb says:

    Good grief. THIS hardly bears comment. The “cosmological principle” has been wrong from the beginning of modern astronomy. Astronomers have been publishing reports for nearly a century that show the universe is not homogeneous.

    ‘How the angular momentum responsible for the rotation is generated in a cosmological context is one of the key unsolved problems of cosmology.’

    Anthony Peratt and his predecessors explained this years ago. These people are the most retarded in getting up to speed on current science I’ve yet come across.

  7. Tenuc Hardon says:

    Wow,more evidence that the universe is no homogenous and isotropic following the Plank CBR map, surely this will put the last nail the coffin of the cosmological principle, and put the falsified theory to its final rest. or will it continue on as a another zombie theory, like dark matter and black holes?

  8. oldbrew says:

    @ Tenuc – yes, they seem to have a black hole where their cosmo ‘principle’ used to be 🤔

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s