Was 2020 a Record-Breaking Hurricane Season? Yes, But. . .

Posted: July 1, 2021 by oldbrew in Analysis, Measurement, Natural Variation, opinion
Tags: ,

.

Quote: ‘the bottom line is that the doubling in the number of named storms over a century is very likely due to technology change, not natural or man-made climate change.’

Inside the Eye

Chris Landsea and Eric Blake [1]

An Incredibly Busy Hurricane Season

The 2020 Atlantic hurricane season was extremely active and destructive with 30 named storms.  (The Hurricane Specialists here at the National Hurricane Center use the designation “named storms” to refer to tropical storms, subtropical storms, hurricanes, and major hurricanes.)  We even reached into the Greek alphabet for names for just the second time ever.  The United States was affected by a record 13 named storms (six of them directly impacted Louisiana), and a record yearly total of 7 billion-dollar tropical cyclone damage events was recorded by the National Centers for Environmental Information (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/time-series/US).  Nearly every country surrounding the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, and tropical/subtropical North Atlantic was threatened or struck in 2020.  Total damage in the United States was around $42 billion with over 240 lives lost in the United States and our neighboring…

View original post 2,983 more words

Comments
  1. pochas94 says:

    Nobody wants to read about a boring, run of the mill hurricanes season.

  2. oldbrew says:

    NOAA’s blog post concludes:

    A follow-on blog post, putting these observed changes of the number of named storms into context of what may be expected to occur in the future, is expected to be published in the near future.
    – – –
    Would anyone be surprised if ‘what may be expected to occur’ turned out to be a version of the usual climate propaganda? 🥱

  3. JB says:

    So what they’re actually observing is increased chatter about storms.
    Gynocentric.

  4. Gamecock says:

    I scanned the original post. It actually seems rational (!).

  5. chickenhawk says:

    As did I Gamecock…Shocked I tell you, it was actually rational. I think the naming of weak and short-lived storms is a mistake, but it will continue, because most people just hear about the large number of storms and think, “Global Climatic Weirding!!!” or some such nonsense, and their job is done.