.
Alarmist CO2 hokum on the rise.
By David Wojick, Ph.D. ~
Many of my disagreements with the IPCC AR6 science Summary for Policy Makers (SPM) are just that, disagreements. I think their reasoning is faulty but at least I understand it. See my last article — “The UN IPCC science panel opts for extreme nuttiness“.
One SPM section, however, is so wrong that it must be a deliberate deception. The purpose seems to be to make the atmospheric CO2 increase look like a simple accumulation of our emissions. I call this the pollution model of CO2 and it is extremely misleading. The truth is well known so this must be a deceptive act on the IPCC’s part.
Here is the opening summary paragraph. The first sentence is a ridiculous 51 tortured words long, the second (and last) sentence states the hoax very clearly.
“While natural land and ocean carbon sinks are projected…
View original post 652 more words
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
Ron Clutz had a related post a few years ago.
CO2 Fluxes, Sources and Sinks
Because carbon fluxes are large and based on measurements from many different sources, estimates have large uncertainties.
Who’d a thunk it? Greentards lie.
This bit from Salby puts the alleged accumulation in perspective.
“The first sentence is a ridiculous 51 tortured words long, the second (and last) sentence states the hoax very clearly.”
Not sure.
It seems very similar to general idiocy of Greenhouse Effect theory.
And it seems to me most would have no clue what Earth’s carbon cycle was.
Or that we are living in Ice Age- or other topics of elementary school.
Ozone is not a greenhouse gas. Nor are clouds any kind of gas.
Ideal thermally conductive blackbody, which is 30% reflective.
Uniform temperature is same as average temperature.
Cobbled to together with other dumb ideas like Venus was once like Earth.
Earth is over populated. And we can’t use Nuclear energy- even if was to
“save the world” {though I guess, especially, if it would save the world}.
If you’re on the government(s) teat(s) you do what the government(s) want. And what do they want? Control. And who do they want to control? You.
The entire document is misleading and deliberately so. The “high confidence” stuff is completely fraudulent – on what possible basis can they judge “confidence”, a subjective word? They are trying to use mathematical concepts from physics in an entirely soft science that cannot prove anything to suggest to idiot politicians that their claims are justified.
What we have is a science that understands very little of its subject but which has made grandiose and extraordinary claims, now forced into deliberate fraud in order to avoid the shame and embarrassment of admitting the original claims were nothing more than wild speculation.
Greentards lie. Who’d a thunk it.
Nothing changes, no lie too big, no action too spiteful, no supporting theory too convoluted, no ‘way ahead’ too childish, no beneficial evidence considered, no contrary information permitted.
They hate people.
Alarmist ducking and weaving continues. Worst US heatwaves and drought on record were nearly 90 years ago…says the IPCC.
according to actual science, humans produce something like 3.5% of all greenhouse (<–ha ha ha) gases. So if we wiped out the entire human race we could theoretically stop 3.5% of about 1.5 degrees or 0.0525 degrees. I don't think that's the issue.