
Having recently advanced the idea that climate change was pushing UK storms further south, from Scotland to northern England, the BBC now features someone saying that the jet streams will move further north – for the same reason, i.e. climate change. Of course their chosen weather predicter is a net-zero enthusiast spouting the usual alarmist propaganda.
– – –
Heavy rainfall, flooding and storm surges will become more common in the UK if global temperatures continue to increase, say scientists.
. . .
Some scientists have suggested that the impact of storm Eunice – and future storms – has been exacerbated by the climate crisis, says BBC Science Focus.
But how exactly do rising temperatures affect the UK weather?
Has climate change caused Storm Eunice?
“Quite often the question posed is whether an event is because of climate change or not. But it’s just not a yes or no question,” said Dr Friederike Otto, a lecturer at the Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London.
“Climate change can be one of the causes, and it can make events worse. But it is never the only cause.”
In the case of storm Eunice, the high-speed winds are unlikely to have been caused by climate change. But, according to Otto, the damage done to the UK shores will have been made worse by the rising temperatures.
“What we do know is that the rainfall and storm surge aspects of these storms is worse because of climate change.”
Climate change could also push storms further up the globe, said Professor Dann Mitchell, a climate scientist at the University of Bristol.
“We do know that the positioning of these storms might change, and that’s because of climate change’s impact on the jet stream.”
The jet stream is an air current that circles the Northern Hemisphere, distributing wind and rain, storms and heatwaves. It’s thought that increasing air temperatures will alter the flow of the air, causing the jet stream to move further north.
“The jet stream controls the storm tracks, the way the storms travel over the North Atlantic and hit us [in the UK]. So, as climate change is causing a poleward shift in the jet stream, you’d expect a poleward shift in the storm tracks as well,” said Mitchell.
“We’re also expecting to see a deeper penetration of these storm tracks in Europe. So, while it’s true to say that the wind itself is not detectably different [due to climate change] yet, in a sense storm winds will increase somewhere, because they’re affecting places that they normally wouldn’t.”
How does climate change cause flooding?
Otto said increased rain is due to what is called the thermodynamic effect. “A warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapour and that water vapour needs to get out of the atmosphere, which it does as rainfall.”
Currently, one degree of global warming results in a seven per cent increase of rainfall in these events. “It doesn’t sound like much, but it’s a lot,” said Otto.
In addition, storm surges that bring water high above normal sea level are now even more dangerous. “Storm surges that usually occur with these events are more damaging, because sea levels are higher than they would have been without climate change,” said Otto.
“As long as temperate global temperatures are rising – and they will not stop rising until we have reached net zero CO2 emissions – these events [will get] more frequent and more intense. With the current trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions, we will see more flooding, more intense rainfall and many more hot and long heatwaves.”
Full article here.






The BBC did actually report the Met Offices statement that there was no evidence of more extreme weather events over the last 40 years in the context of and alongside the 10.00 news of this weeks weather events. I have noted a more balanced approach several times this year. Not sure how they slipped up.
So, while it’s true to say that the wind itself is not detectably different [due to climate change] yet…
Last year…
Low wind speeds hurt profits at two of Europe’s major energy firms
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/12/low-wind-speeds-hurt-profits-at-two-of-europes-major-energy-firms.html
– – –
Isn’t that the wrong kind of ‘different’ for alarmists?
Alarmists have had no luck in reducing CO2 which inexorably climbs at 2ppm a year. But they’ve done incredibly well at controlling global temperature. Looking at the UAH graph we are at the same as in 1988. Well Done! Btw we can’t have climate change events producing climate change. Let’s call it global warming.
Hairy landing at Heathrow…
Why global warming is good for us
Climate change is creating a greener, safer planet.
– by Matt Ridley
The biggest benefit of emissions is global greening, the increase year after year of green vegetation on the land surface of the planet. Forests grow more thickly, grasslands more richly and scrub more rapidly. This has been measured using satellites and on-the-ground recording of plant-growth rates. It is happening in all habitats, from tundra to rainforest.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/02/15/why-global-warming-is-good-for-us/
– – –
‘Benefit of emissions’? Not really, but a benefit anyway.
For goodness sake, Almost to the day, or at least the week, we’ve had weather like this in varying degrees of local severity, REGULARLY in recent living memory. Winter of 61/62, 78/79, and often since then – but have been so busy involved IN IT that I’ve given up tryoing to rememeber the exact year – just that it was END of February and / or extending into MARCH with Much Snow and drifting, OR much snow after 8am which was gone again by 5pm ( Sunrise to sunset hours – easy to remember ….. Lambing snows, calving snows, seasons wh ere the February cereal sowing may have been better left in the bag (than in the soil), etc etc.
I am ashamed that my old university houses a part of the UN Church of Climatology, Grantham Institute. One that spouts such complete clap trap about the weather and climate.
It would help if they went back to the universities roots and did some real world research, not computer models unless they are verified and proven to give real world results, nor feelings based on some screwed up idea. but facts based on real measurements. Also they shouldn’t call it climate ‘science’ because it isn’t a science in real terms, it is like all the other fake sciences like social science etc.
Ah yes, 1977, San Francisco, snowball fights on the way to school.
Then the drought hit. Bad one.
Pretty sure that was the event horizon, though back then it was all about the coming ice age.
Keeps the science funded regardless.
The trouble is they don’t relate an event like this to actual conditions. It’s not “warmer”. UAH shows an anomaly of 0.03 degrees for January and temperatures have been falling as we shift from a large El Nino to a large La Nina.
So everything that happened a few years ago caused by climate change should be lessening.
caused by climate change is putting the cart before the horse. Climate change is an observed result of weather patterns changing.
But wait, Phoenix! Anomalies are a joke.
We’re talking 286.96K to 286.99K.
YAWN!