Giant impact crater in Greenland occurred a few million years after dinosaurs went extinct

Posted: March 13, 2022 by oldbrew in History, research, Uncertainty
Tags:

Credit: Uwe Dedering @ Wikipedia


Another crater controversy ends as two different dating methods produced the same result.
– – –
Danish and Swedish researchers have dated the enormous Hiawatha impact crater, a 31 km-wide asteroid crater buried under a kilometer of Greenlandic ice, says the University of Copenhagen.

The dating ends speculation that the asteroid impacted after the appearance of humans and opens up a new understanding of Earth’s evolution in the post-dinosaur era.

Ever since 2015, when researchers at the University of Copenhagen’s GLOBE Institute discovered the Hiawatha impact crater in northwestern Greenland, uncertainty about the crater’s age has been the subject of considerable speculation.

Could the asteroid have slammed into Earth as recently as 13,000 years ago, when humans had long populated the planet? Could its impact have catalyzed a nearly 1,000-year period of global cooling known as the Younger Dryas?

New analyses performed on grains of sand and rocks from the Hiawatha impact crater by the Natural History Museum of Denmark and the GLOBE Institute at the University of Copenhagen, as well as the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm, demonstrate that the answer is no.

The Hiawatha impact crater is far older. In fact, a new study published in the journal Science Advances today reports its age to be 58 million years old.

“Dating the crater has been a particularly tough nut to crack, so it’s very satisfying that two laboratories in Denmark and Sweden, using different dating methods arrived at the same conclusion. As such, I’m convinced that we’ve determined the crater’s actual age, which is much older than many people once thought,” says Michael Storey of the Natural History Museum of Denmark.

“Determining the new age of the crater surprised us all. In the future, it will help us investigate the impact’s possible effect on climate during an important epoch of Earth’s history” says Dr. Gavin Kenny of the Swedish Museum of Natural History.

As one of those who helped discover the Hiawatha impact crater in 2015, Professor Nicolaj Krog Larsen of the GLOBE Institute at the University of Copenhagen is pleased that the crater’s exact age is now confirmed.

“It is fantastic to now know its age. We’ve been working hard to find a way to date the crater since we discovered it seven years ago. Since then, we have been on several field trips to the area to collect samples associated with the Hiawatha impact,” says Professor Larsen.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. […] Giant impact crater in Greenland occurred a few million years after dinosaurs went extinct […]

  2. JB says:

    “uncertainty about the crater’s age has been the subject of considerable speculation.”
    Layman’s verbiage: We have no real idea how to test for the age of the impact, as opposed to the age of the strata, much less the actual asteroid age.

    “The sand was analyzed at the Natural History Museum of Denmark by heating the grains with a laser until they released argon gas, whereas the rock samples were analyzed at the Swedish Museum of Natural History using uranium-lead dating of the mineral zircon.”

    Sounds like dating the material, not the impact event to me. I’ve yet to hear of a verifiable test that conclusively is accurate to millions of years, either.

  3. oldbrew says:

    Shocked zircon indicates an impact.

    Study abstract: ‘shocked zircon dates to 57.99 ± 0.54 Ma, which we interpret as the impact age’

  4. Graeme No.3 says:

    Well, that’s “The Science is Settled”.
    I note that the charts of global temperature (most of them) show a short drop around that time, followed by the PETM (Paleogene Eocene Temperature Maximum) warm spike so beloved by the “Doom is coming real soon” mob.
    I was taught that asteroid impacts caused global cooling, so it seems this giant impacting asteroid might have been a different type.

  5. Curious George says:

    A great piece of science, but I do still consider it a preliminary finding. As most of the impact area is inaccessible, there may still be surprises when other samples become available.

  6. Phil Salmon says:

    How many deaths must the wretched YD impact hypothesis suffer? Before it finally stops haunting us?