Climate change effect on Peruvian glaciers debated in German court

Posted: May 28, 2022 by oldbrew in climate, Legal

Bumpy road ahead?[image credit: RWE]

Possibly the longest running climate ‘lawfare’ case ever. Sometimes the duration of a case is itself a large part of the desired effect, whatever the outcome. Lawyers win as usual.
– – –
German judges and experts have arrived at the edge of a melting glacier high up in the Peruvian Andes to examine a complaint made by a local farmer who accuses energy giant RWE of threatening his home by contributing to global warming, says Digital Journal.

The visit by the nine-member delegation to the region is the latest stage in a case the plaintiffs hope will set a new worldwide precedent.

Leading the demand for “climate justice” is 41-year-old Peruvian farmer Saul Luciano Lliuya, who lives in the mountains close to the city of Huaraz.

He has filed suit against the German firm RWE, saying its greenhouse gas emissions are responsible for the melting of nearby glaciers.

The trip was ordered by the Higher Regional Court in the northern German city of Hamm, where Lliuya submitted his claim against RWE, having previously had his case dismissed by another court in Essen.

The delegation must determine what risk the melting glaciers pose to the city of Huaraz and its 120,000 inhabitants below the Palcacocha glacier.

“We want the RWE company to be held responsible for environmental damages,” Lliuya, a farmer and tourist guide supported by the German environmental NGO Germanwatch, told AFP.

“In general they have polluted all over the world and with this claim we are trying to do something,” added Lliuya.

RWE operates in 27 countries in the world, including Chile and Brazil, but not Peru.

The claim “was rejected in the first instance because it did not have any legal basis and did not respect German civil law,” RWE spokesman Guido Steffen told AFP.

“We are confident this will happen again with the appeal.”

Full article here.

  1. […] Climate change effect on Peruvian glaciers debated in German court […]

  2. ilma630 says:

    If it’s ‘global’ warming he’s worried about, what about China? Has this Peruvian sued them? Of course not. Just go for the most likely target to capitulate. Strange that the German judge hasn’t realized this yet and thrown the case out!

  3. Phoenix44 says:

    A farmer at altitude isn’t benefiting from a slightly warmer world and retreating glaciers?

    I smell a rat.

  4. oldbrew says:

    The idea of climate justice assumes nothing untoward ever happens in the Earth’s climate without human intervention. But that should be obvious nonsense.

  5. Saighdear says:

    “….a farmer and tourist guide supported by the German environmental NGO Germanwatch, told AFP…..” SAYS IT ALL, doesn’t it ?

  6. Gamecock says:

    Find RWE guilty, and award Lliuya his damages . . . one Deutschmark.

    Judges traveling to Peru should have to pay damages for their carbon footprint as well. An American penny should cover it.

  7. Bazz says:

    What a lot of nonsense ! What part of Global warming was caused by RWE is the first question. The real question to be answered is;

  8. Phoenix44 says:

    I’d missed the bit about him being a tourist guide – how does he think the tourists get to Peru?

    His living literally depends on fossil fuels.

  9. Gamecock says:

    Zactly, Phoenix. Even more ironic is complaints from Maldives, who also depend on fossil fuels for their FOOD.

    Male is an island cruise ship. If you have never seen it on Google Earth, it’s worth the effort to look.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s