Plankton will store more carbon as Earth’s climate warms, but ‘Twilight Zone’ uncertainties remain say researchers

Posted: July 12, 2022 by oldbrew in atmosphere, Carbon cycle, Ocean dynamics, predictions, research, Uncertainty
Tags: , ,

CO2 is not pollution


The researchers are not going overboard with positivity, but seem clear that the Earth’s carbon cycle is still working much as expected. Unsurprisingly perhaps, they theorise problems might occur by 2100 if some presently unknown limit is approached, but say ‘the Twilight Zone region of the ocean’ needs more research. In short, so far so good.
– – –
The amount of carbon stored by microscopic plankton will increase in the coming century, predict researchers at the University of Bristol and the National Oceanography Centre (NOC).

Using the latest IPCC models (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), the team expects the “biological pump”—a process where microscopic plants, often called phytoplankton, take up carbon and then die and sink into the deep ocean where carbon is stored for hundreds of years—to account for between 5 and 17% of the total increase in carbon uptake by the oceans by 2100.

Their findings were published today in the journal PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), says Phys.org.

Lead author Dr. Jamie Wilson, of the University of Bristol’s School of Earth Sciences, explained, “The biological pump stores roughly double the amount of carbon dioxide that is currently in our atmosphere in the deep ocean. Because plankton are sensitive to climate change, this carbon pool is likely to change in size, so we set out to understand how this would change in the future in response to climate change by looking at the latest future projections by IPCC models.”

Microscopic organisms called plankton, living in the sunlit surface of the ocean, use carbon dioxide during photosynthesis. When these plankton die, their remains rapidly sink down through the “Twilight Zone” of the ocean (200–1000m), where environmental factors, such as temperature and oxygen concentration, and ecological factors, such as being eaten by other plankton, control how much reaches the deep ocean where the carbon from their bodies is stored away from the atmosphere for hundreds to thousands of years.

Warming of the oceans slows down the circulation, increasing the time that carbon is stored in the deep ocean.

Contributing author Dr. Anna Katavouta, who worked alongside early-career scientist Dr. Chelsey Baker, both from the National Oceanography Centre, added, “Our research found a consistent increase in the carbon stored in the ocean by the biological carbon pump over the 21st century in the latest IPCC model projections. In contrast, we found a decline in the global export production (the amount of organic matter, such as dead plankton, sinking below the ocean surface), which suggests that export production may not be as accurate a metric for the biological carbon pump than previously thought. We demonstrated that the organic matter flux at 1000 meters is instead a better predictor of long-term carbon sequestration associated with the biological carbon pump. This outcome will help us to better understand the processes that control the biological carbon pump and to predict more reliably how much of the carbon released due to human activity will be stored in the ocean in the future.”

However, the IPCC models have no consistent representation of the environmental and ecological processes in the Twilight Zone. This leads to a large uncertainty in how much carbon dioxide originating from the atmosphere the biological pump will store beyond the end of the century.

In theory, after 2100, carbon storage by the biological pump could stall and instead may start acting as a source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, which could exacerbate climate change further.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. […] Plankton will store more carbon as Earth’s climate warms, but ‘Twilight Zone’ unce… […]

  2. Phoenix44 says:

    This sort of stuff is pure garbage. They don’t know what’s going on nor what will happen. It’s not science, just idle “maybes”.

  3. oldbrew says:

    “This outcome will help us to better understand the processes that control the biological carbon pump and to predict more reliably how much of the carbon released due to human activity will be stored in the ocean in the future.”

    Where/what are the current figures for that?

  4. catweazle666 says:

    Multidecadal increase in North Atlantic coccolithophores and the potential role of rising CO2
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaa8026

  5. oldbrew says:

    Thanks catweazle.

    Contrary to the generalized assumption of negative effects of ocean acidification on calcifiers, coccolithophores may be capable of adapting to a high-CO2 world (24), especially given evidence of highly calcified coccolithophores in areas with seasonally high pCO2 or low pH (7, 8). Coccolithophores show outstanding competitive abilities under the stratified, warm, nutrient-depleted conditions projected for the future ocean.

    Sounds OK.

  6. catweazle666 says:

    “Ocean acidification” is of course flat out lie, the ocean pH will not and cannot ever drop below 7.
    In fact, as the ocean warms, Henry’s law tells us that it will outgas CO2, not absorb it, from which we can appreciate that “climate scientists” are presumably unaware of such trivialities.

    [reply] indeed

  7. Roger, Josh

    People on all the different sides only talk about CO2.

    None are even considering that it is more likely that water, which is abundant, and which changes state, there is water, water vapor and ice, each more abundant in our climate systems than CO2 and it is orders of magnitude that water, in all of its changing states, regulates the climate with self correcting changes that limit the bounds of warming and cooling of the climate system. No one is studying even the possibility that CO2 is not regulating the climate. Promote actual climate change study of other factors, other than CO2.

    Alex Pope

    http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail Virus-free. http://www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

  8. oldbrew says:

    British Antarctic Survey: Shell thickness of Nucella lapillus in the North Sea increased over the last 130 years despite ocean acidification
    9 July, 2022

    We used multivariate ecological models to identify significant morphological trends through time and along environmental gradients and show that, contrary to global predictions, local N. lapillus populations built continuously thicker shells while maintaining a consistent shell shape throughout the last century. [bold added]

    https://www.bas.ac.uk/data/our-data/publication/shell-thickness-of-nucella-lapillus-in-the-north-sea-increased/

    Our models also suggest a significant effect of wind energy regimes on calcite formation in the shell of N. lapillus, but more information is required to substantiate this link.
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-022-00486-7#Sec6

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s