Newly described “solar clock” can precisely predict solar cycle events years in advance

Posted: August 10, 2022 by oldbrew in Cycles, Electro-magnetism, predictions, research, weather
Tags: ,


Some bold claims made here. Results needed to back them up.
– – –
New research shows that a “solar clock” based on the sun’s magnetic field, rather than the presence or absence of sunspots, can precisely describe and predict many key changes throughout the solar cycle, says Eurekalert.

The new framework offers a significant improvement over the traditional sunspot method, because it can predict surges in dangerous solar flares or changing weather trends years in advance.

It also accurately describes many more parameters related to the solar cycle than sunspots alone.

Ever since humans could first observe sunspots about 400 years ago, we’ve been using them to try to define the solar cycle.

Approximately every 11 years, solar activity such as sunspots and solar flares ebbs and flows, causing changes to weather patterns on Earth and occasionally threatening telecommunications. Predicting these changes reliably could help everyone from farmers to the military.

Traditionally, scientists have used the concept of a “solar minimum,” when solar activity is reduced, to mark the beginning of each cycle. But the “solar minimum” framework is somewhat arbitrary and imprecise, explains Robert Leamon, research scientist at the Partnership for Heliophysics and Space Environment Research (PHaSER), a UMBC partnership with NASA.

Leamon led new research showing that a “solar clock” based on the sun’s magnetic field, rather than the presence or absence of sunspots, can precisely describe and predict many key changes throughout the solar cycle.

The new framework offers a significant improvement over the traditional sunspot method, because it can predict surges in dangerous solar flares or changing weather trends years in advance.

Specifically, the new research, published in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, shows that the solar cycle operates as a distinct sequence of events. Notable, and sometimes abrupt, changes occur at each one-fifth of a cycle. That’s true regardless of the exact length of a given cycle, which can vary by several months to a year. In a nod to music enthusiasts, Leamon and colleagues call it a “circle of fifths.”

Finding the landmarks

The new paper by Leamon and colleagues Scott McIntosh, at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and Alan Title, at the Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, builds on work by Leamon, McIntosh, and Daniel Marsh, also at NCAR, published in 2020. That paper demonstrated the existence of a solar cycle phenomenon the research team dubbed “the terminator.”

The sun’s magnetic field changes direction each solar cycle, but there is overlap between consecutive cycles. The sun’s magnetic field is sometimes called the polar field because it either points to one of the sun’s poles or the other. A terminator marks when the previous cycle’s polar field has completely disappeared from the sun’s surface, and is quickly followed by a dramatic rise in solar activity.

The new paper points to additional landmarks along the journey through a full solar cycle from terminator to terminator. These landmarks are clearer and more consistent than using sunspots as a guide to cycle length.

For example, “The max number of sunspots doesn’t quite align with when the polar field reverses, but the polar field reversal happens at exactly one-fifth of the cycle going from terminator to terminator,” Leamon says.

At two-fifths of a cycle, dark areas called “polar coronal holes” re-form at the sun’s poles. At three-fifths of a cycle, the last X-flare, a class of very large and potentially dangerous solar flares, occurs. At four-fifths, sunspots are at a minimum—but this landmark is less consistent. And then the sun passes through another terminator, after which solar activity rapidly picks up again. Other phenomena, such as UV emissions, also line up nicely on the fifths.

Symptoms and causes

The team picked out patterns in data collected daily by two ground-based observatories. The Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory in Penticton, Canada has measured solar radio flux, which serves as a useful proxy for solar activity, daily since 1947. The Wilcox Solar Observatory at Stanford University has collected daily measurements of magnetic fields on the sun’s surface since 1975.

Once the team noticed the changes that occur at exactly one-fifth of a cycle, they asked, “How many different solar things can we look at? And then we realized they all overlap on this same set of fifths,” Leamon says. Different parameters shift at different points on the cycle, but “everything is tied to these five landmarks.”

This new theory of a solar clock changes the focus from sunspots to shifts in magnetic field. “It’s almost like symptoms and causes,” Leamon says. While sunspots are an important symptom, the magnetic field is the underlying cause driving the solar cycle.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. Gamecock says:

    ‘The new framework offers a significant improvement over the traditional sunspot method, because it can predict surges in dangerous solar flares or changing weather trends years in advance.’

    Can’t imagine who this might help.

    “There’s going to be a surge in solar flares in 2029.”

    “Mmm . . . okay.”

  2. Phoenix44 says:

    “While sunspots are an important symptom, the magnetic field is the underlying cause driving the solar cycle.”

    Did anybody claim sunspots drive the cycle? Sure its the magnetic field. But what makes that change?

  3. oldbrew says:

    From the paper, in: 2.4 The Circle of Fifths

    There is consistently:

    1. at the Terminator, a rapid surge in F10.7 (through 90 sfu, almost by definition);

    2. at 0.2 cycles, a dip around polar field reversal;

    3. at 0.4 cycles, a sharp drop—when the polar coronal hole and polar crown filament reform and elements of the next cycle appear at high latitudes;

    4. at 0.6 cycles, the onset of “quiet” conditions with greatly reduced numbers of X-flares as discussed before, and with approximately the same F10.7 output as at the Terminator;

    5. at 0.8 cycles, approximately canonical minimum, the pattern completes.
    – – –
    See also: 3.2 Forecasting Using the Solar Unit Cycle for a prediction…
    we can already predict when cycle 25 will end by linear extrapolation of the cycle 25 bands’ equatorward progress. Leamon et al. (2020) thus determined October 2031 ± 9 months

    Terminator:
    Note that expressing cycle progression as a fraction of their length requires the terminator of cycle 24 to be hard-wired. For the interests of this paper it is set to December 2021, based on monthly mean F10.7 observations exceeding the F10.7 = 90 sfu threshold that is a good approximation to both the terminators and pre-terminators

  4. […] Newly described “solar clock” can precisely predict solar cycle events years in advance […]

  5. Gamecock says:

    ‘± 9 months’ doesn’t qualify for ‘precisely.’

    I browsed the linked paper. The writers seem level headed. They don’t say ‘precisely.’

    What th . . . ?

    Oh, I see. It’s the Eurekalert article headline. Punching up the science. We can’t have basic science anymore; it all has to be relevant.

  6. Paul Vaughan says:

    severely misinformed individual claimed to have all “the answers”
    told the individual repeatedly “i have to go”
    the individual did not respect this
    considered filing a harassment report

    of what use are “answers” when each leads to 24 more questions?
    lol

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s