Norway’s future CO2 cemetery takes shape – but what’s the point?

Posted: September 5, 2022 by oldbrew in atmosphere, climate, Emissions, Subsidies
Tags: ,


An expensive exercise in futility. As noted below, ‘the scheme will be able to process 1.5 million tonnes of CO2 per year, then later between five and six million tonnes. But that is just a tiny fraction of annual carbon emissions across Europe.’ Even Greenpeace opposes it. It’s for show, not for any useful purpose.
– – –
On the shores of an island off Norway’s North Sea coast, engineers are building a burial ground for unwanted greenhouse gas, reports

The future terminal is to pump tonnes of liquefied carbon dioxide captured from the top of factory chimneys across Europe into cavities deep below the seabed.

The project in the western municipality of Oygarden aims to prevent the gas from entering the atmosphere and contributing to global warming.

It “is the world’s first open-access transport and storage infrastructure, allowing any emitter that has captured his CO2 emissions to deliver that CO2 for safe handling, transport and then permanent storage,” project manager Sverre Overa told AFP.

As the planet struggles to meet its climate targets, some climate experts see the technique, called carbon capture and storage, or CCS, as a means to partially reduce emissions from fossil-fuel-based industries.

Norway is the biggest hydrocarbon producer in Western Europe, but it also boasts the best CO2 storage prospects on the continent, especially in its depleted North Sea oil fields.

The government has financed 80 percent of the infrastructure, putting 1.7 billion euros ($1.7 billion) on the table as part of a wider state plan to develop the technology.

A cement factory and a waste-to-energy plant in the Oslo region are set to send their CO2 to the site.

But the most original feature of the project is on the commercial side: inviting foreign firms to send their CO2 pollution to be buried out of harm’s way.

Pipeline plans

Using CCS to curb carbon pollution is not a new idea, but despite generous subsidies the technology has never taken off, mainly because it is so costly.

One of the world’s largest carbon capture facilities, at the Petra Nova coal-fired plant in Texas, was mothballed in 2020 because it was not economical.

There are only a couple of dozen operational CCS projects around the world, according to the industry-run Global CCS Institute.

But the failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with Paris Agreement goals and a massive influx of government subsidies have breathed new life into the technology.

Full article here.

  1. Philip Mulholland says:

    Yet another example of a parasitic industrial enterprise.

  2. oldbrew says:

    Using CCS to curb carbon pollution is not a new idea

    No, but it’s a lie because there is no ‘carbon pollution’ in carbon dioxide. Trees, plants etc. depend on it: photosynthesis. So do air breathing life forms as the output includes oxygen…

  3. […] Norway’s future CO2 cemetery takes shape – but what’s the point? | Tallbloke’s Talkshop … […]

  4. Bazz says:

    Oh what a complete waste of time and money ! How will they face people after it is realised it is all a total error and it is all just a natural cycle.

  5. catweazle666 says:

    Just another subsidy farm to benefit the usual trough-snouting suspects such as Gummer and Potato’Ed (or their Norwegian equivalents).

  6. Gamecock says:

    ‘into cavities deep below the seabed’

    . . . which never leak.

  7. catweazle666 says:

    Lake Nyos mean anything to anybody?

  8. Saighdear says:

    Yeah yeah yeah, and from Cemetery to CEMENT, our great Gordie Broon ( should have remained with his Family in the Sunday Paper ) famously increased our costss by taxing Cement production as a big CO2 emitter: take a listen to this very informative talk with Jamie M. Gentoso, Chief Executive Officer of US Cement Operations which I fell over on the new UK channel earthx tv.

  9. JB says:

    So they want to unbalance the ocean’s natural CO2 process? Push down here, pop up over there.

  10. oldbrew says:

    ‘Carbon capture not a net zero solution!’
    2 September 2022

    Research claims more projects are underperforming than successful

    Carbon capture storage has long been touted as a key driver in the net zero transition but a new report disputes this, claiming the technology is “not a climate solution.”

    The study by researchers from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) claims that the technology cannot be a trailblazer in the journey to net zero, as more carbon capture projects are underperforming than being successful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s