Researchers propose a chemical compound to increase oceanic CO2 sequestration

Posted: December 23, 2022 by oldbrew in Carbon cycle, Emissions, innovation, research
Tags: ,

The ocean carbon cycle [credit: IAEA]

So-called climate schemes have a tendency to be horribly expensive, impractical and of debatable benefit. The 25% figure quoted in the article for natural ocean CO2 uptake is likely an underestimate anyway. Is this just another straw for emission-obsessed alarmists to clutch at?
– – –
Enhancing the ocean’s ability to remove CO2 particles from the atmosphere will be crucial in the fight against climate change, according to a new research paper, says

At present, around 25% of all CO2 emitted to the air is absorbed by the oceans. When these molecules enter the water they cause acidification, having a negative impact on marine environments, particularly for shell forming organisms such as crabs and shellfish that rely on fragile eco-systems for survival.

But in a joint research paper published today (Dec. 21) in the journal, Joule, academics from Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh and the University of Hamburg, believe they have found a way to increase the amount of CO2 stored in the ocean without causing additional acidification.

They have developed an engineering process to manufacture at scale a naturally occurring, although rare, hydrated carbonate mineral known as ikaite.

Rich in calcium, this mineral, when exposed to sea water, dissolves and converts CO2 into a bicarbonate (HCO3) ions, which is a chemical compound that neutralizes acidity. The scientists say this could lead to significantly more CO2 being retained by the oceans for hundreds of thousands of years.

Dr. Phil Renforth from the Research Centre for Carbon Solutions (RCCS) at Heriot-Watt University, proposed the idea and is leading a project to explore the feasibility of this approach. He explains, “In order to avoid dangerous climate change and to meet the UN’s targets of reaching net zero by 2050, then it has become apparent that we must remove CO2 for our atmosphere. This is an enormous challenge but our idea is to utilize the world’s oceans.

“The oceans are a huge carbon dioxide reservoir and we want to enhance that sink providing it does not harm marine eco-systems and that it can be done safely and responsibly. What we put forward in this paper is a new method that overcomes the limitations of some of the previous proposals while maintaining the overall benefit to the ocean.”

The academic team of geochemists and engineers have proposed a production method for ikaite that can be replicated at scale as two key materials required—limestone and water—are in plentiful supply.

It works by placing limestone and water into a reactor alongside pressurized CO2. The limestone dissolves and the resulting ‘hard water’ is placed inside another reactor where it is exposed to low pressures. This pressure-swing creates crystals of ikaite which can be removed from the reactor and added to the ocean, increasing its alkalinity and removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

In order to maintain its chemical stability, the ikaite needs to be deposited in waters no warmer than 15 degrees Celsius such as in northern Europe, Russia, parts of Australia, South America and South Africa.

Dr. Renforth added, “This technology could be scaled up to have a meaningful impact on climate change, and the costs could be comparable to other CO2 removal approaches. That is possible within the next 20 to 30 years, particularly as the raw materials are abundant.”

“While we should be optimistic, we need to know more about the process to fully understand how this technology would work and to understand its limitations.”

Full article here.

  1. cognog2 says:

    This is totally duff, right from the start as you only have to ask WHY they want to do it and you will wind up with a lot of WOKE CAGW arms waiving weird conjectures in your face.
    If they managed to give you a degree Kelvin figure of warming reduction they would struggle to know how to measure it.

    I could go on but with little point. All you will get from this lot is how much money they want.

  2. Curious George says:

    Let’s poison all oceans, and see the positive impact.

  3. And if they manage to suck all CO2 out of the air, then…..X

  4. stpaulchuck says:

    if it goes to normal results, the oceans will die then millions (billions?) of people will die of starvation. So, the usual then.

  5. catweazle666 says:

    I must say, I’ve read some fearful pseudo-scientific claptrap in my time but that lot takes the biscuit.

    Did no-one educate these people in the mysteries of Dalton’s law, Henry’s law and Raoult’s law?

    As to the good old “ocean acidification” chestnut, it is considerably more complex than simply dissolving CO2 in water creates carbonic acid, did no-one explain the concept of “buffering” to these fruitloops?

    Here is a useful primer on the subject:

    Solution chemistry of carbon dioxide in sea water

    Click to access chapter2.pdf

  6. Paul Cottingham says:

    “Carbon cycle modelling and the residence time of natural and anthropogenic atmospheric CO2, (1997) by Tom Segalstad” shows up the scientific fraud in the Carbon Cycle for man-made CO2. Isn’t it 4 percent of the 400ppm of CO2 being man-made and volcanic. That’s 10ppm for Volcanic and 6ppm for Man-made CO2. Ice core data shows that there is a 800 year lag for natural CO2 level increase. The Medieval Warm period peaked 800 years ago, so that proves that most of the increase was natural CO2 from the deep Ocean which has a 275 ratio mixing with the Atmosphere over a period of 800 years. The upper Ocean has a 50 ratio mixing with the Atmosphere over a seven year period. The IPCC has “Cancelled” Henrys law, isotopic evidence in tree rings and findings about the carbon dioxide atmosphere of Venus, at one bar pressure. A consensus of scientists and government officials from around the world take the money because “Politicians are throwing money that they do not have at a problem that does not exist in order to finance solutions that make no difference.” Michael Hart. Those scientists who say it’s a hoax or say emergency authorised experimental mRNA jabs are not safe and effective, got censored and sacked by people more powerful than the scientists.

  7. Eric says:

    Reblogged this on Calculus of Decay .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s