.
A trillion here, a trillion there – and then they woke up…or not.
By Steve Goreham and Dr. Jay Lehr ~
It is really time for us all to stop taking any of the information broadcast out of the annual United Nations climate conferences called Conference Of The Parties seriously. The 27th such conference which convened in Egypt this month concluded with the following statement.
“The Conference of the Parties…Highlights that about USD 4 trillion per year needs to be invested in renewable energy up until 2030 to be able to reach net zero emissions by 2050.” That which would eliminate all life on earth that depends on carbon dioxide which is all life on earth.
It does not include reparations for loss and damage. That potentially much greater financial flow (as it is called in UN speak) is extra.
The precise nature of this called for transformation of the financial system is not specified but easy money seems a…
View original post 858 more words
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
“It is really time for us all to stop taking any of the information broadcast out of the annual United Nations climate conferences called Conference Of The Parties seriously. ”
Did that decades ago when Climate nonsense appeared in the rags. What’s taking everyone else so long to have their epiphany?
“multilateral development banks”
“mobilize climate finance”
“commensurate operational model”
“address risk appetite”
“Climate reparations ”
Some people have had WAAAY too much schooling
“Some people have had WAAAY too much schooling”
And all of it wrong.
Conference Of The Parties
27 rounds of parties and CO2 still on the rise 🎉🎈
While reading another article of Dr. Jay Lehr, I wanted to ask him clarification question, but maybe some of you here will know:
In article https://www.cfact.org/2022/11/28/serious-arguments-for-citizen-climate-warriors-book-review-of-dumb-energy-by-norman-rogers/
In section “Fallacies of Renewable Energy”
> these faulty assumptions:
> 1) We will run out of fossil fuels in the foreseeable future.
It’s not further explained, why this is “faulty assumption”…
I think the only real reason for that “Net Zero” insanity is, that we are going to run out of most of oil reserves in 30 years…
All other globalists’ scam with supposed CO2 dangers is produced just to hide this reason from ordinary people, who would not restrain oneselves just because of next generation…?? And that the phasing out should be prepared soon enough…
So what are real oil reserves ?
πα½
“The basic assumption of peak oil analysis is that you have prior knowledge of what the available reserves are, and in fact we do not”
https://www.livescience.com/38869-peak-oil.html
It depends on where they look, how long for, etc.
Also: ‘Under contemporary conditions, it is more economically sound not to look for new oil fields but to overhaul old ones. Oil reappears from time to time in old deposits and long ago exhausted oil wells.’
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080131111653.htm
How come we don’t tell them that we are currently in an ice-age. The Quaternary Ice-Age to be precise. I never worked out why not because the words “unprecedented temperatures” are thereby exposed as deeply dishonest. What is the matter with us?
“So what are real oil reserves ?”
Inconceivable.
Not only are there inestimably vast reserves now made available by the use of steerable drilling and hydraulic fracture technique, those same methods make available trillions of coal seams amenable to in situ gasification in the UK alone.
This produces CO2, CO and H2 along with volatile organics, CO and H2 of course being synthesis gas, feedstock for the good old Fischer Tropsch coal-to-oil process that was used by Germany for much of their petroleum supply during WWII.
On top of that are the truly massive reserves of methane locked up as hydrates on the ocean floor and in permafrost, strangely these are little publicised despite a number of countries researching them.
One particularly intriguing aspect of hydrate extraction is the apparent ability of the water to be replaced by CO2, thus making the extracted methane effectively carbon neutral.
https://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-1/energy/methane-hydrates/
So we are assured of a supply of fossil fuels for centuries – perhaps millennia – yet, whether the Green doomsters like it or not.