.
.
More climate-sceptic links than you can shake a stick at here.
By Dr. John Happs ~
According to Wikipedia the scientific method involves careful observation, rigorous scepticism about what is observed … formulating hypothesis … testing and refinement etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
A number of entries in Wikipedia appear to display an absence of the above principles when it comes to reporting about climate change, with little criticism of the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) narrative. Thus, we have excellent examples of why this online source should be closely examined for possible bias when providing information about climate change and influencing factors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_conspiracy_theory
Close inspection suggests that Wikipedia has deleted a list of the many well-qualified scientists who have rejected the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming meme:
William Connolley was noted for promoting Wikipedia’s climate alarmist views whilst suppressing any rational, skeptical information that he didn’t like. Lawrence Solomon noted how:
“He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect…
View original post 4,826 more words
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
Perhaps this has something to do with it:
Jimmy Wales
Jimmy Wales is an internet entrepreneur and co-founder of Wikipedia and Wikia. He is a non-executive director of Guardian Media Group, owner of the Guardian and the Observer
https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jimmy-wales
This is the reason why I don’t contribute to Wikipedia.
it’s as bad or worse on other political entries, and AGW/CAGW is nothing but politics as religion