Researchers investigate the “Warm Arctic-Cold Continent” (WACC) climate theory

Posted: April 6, 2023 by oldbrew in data, Natural Variation, predictions, research, Temperature, Uncertainty, weather
Tags: , ,


Their analysis relates to 1979-2018 only. Media talk of ‘stranded’ polar bears, not mentioned in the study, ignores the fact that they are talented swimmers. The unresolved issue of the wavier jet stream is noted in the study, but that’s all. They admit prediction of where it’s all going is difficult.
– – –
Pictures of melting glaciers and stranded [?] polar bears on shrinking sea ice in the Arctic are perhaps the most striking images that have been used to highlights the effects of global warming, says Phys.org.

However, they do not convey the full extent of the consequences of warmer Arctic. In recent years, there has been growing recognition of the Arctic’s role in driving extreme weather events in other parts of the world. [Talkshop comment – dubious assertions]

While the Arctic has been warming at a rate twice as fast as the global average, winters in the midlatitude regions have experienced colder and more severe weather events.

For instance, the winter of 2022-2023 saw record-breaking cold temperatures and snowfall in Japan, China, and Korea. Similarly, many parts of Eurasia and North America have experienced severe cold snaps, with heavy snowfall and prolonged periods of sub-zero temperatures.

While there are multiple theories for this climate phenomenon, an international team of researchers led by Professor Jin-Ho Yoon from Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Korea set out to examine the relationship between the severe winters in the Northern Hemisphere and the melting sea ice in the Arctic region, a phenomenon referred to as the “Warm Arctic-Cold Continent” (WACC), and how this relationship changed with the warming climate.

In their study published in npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, the researchers looked at historic climate data and turned to climate projection models to explore the potential connection and assess how this phenomenon might be influenced by different global warming scenarios.

Based on the climate data from the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) going back almost 40 years, the researchers correlated winter temperatures in East Asia and North America to the temperatures of the Barents-Kara Sea and the East Siberian-Chukchi Sea in the Arctic region.

They observed that lower winter temperatures in East Asia and North America are usually accompanied by warmer Arctic Sea temperatures. However, they also found that in some winters, such as the 2017/18 winter in East Asia, this pattern did not hold, suggesting that this linkage include uncertainty likely due to factors other than Arctic Sea temperatures were at play.

Nonetheless, using climate projections from the Half degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts (HAPPI) experiments which were targeted to project future climate under 1.5°C to 2°C warming scenarios, the researchers found the WACC pattern to persist even when global temperatures rose.

However, they found that the correlation between the Arctic Sea temperature and the East Asia temperatures became more uncertain with the intensification of global warming.

Full article here.

Comments
  1. ivan says:

    So it is the standard cop out of computer games and therefore meaningless. Why can’t these so called ‘scientists’ get out of their comfortable universities and do some real world on site investigations – they might learn something?

  2. Phoenix44 says:

    So there’s no correlation in the actual data, but when they run their models they correlate…but then they stop correlating.

    This is literally not science. It is random. And yes, when one part of the glove gets abnormally cold, another part will get abnormally warm, and vice-versa. That’s how it works. So in what possible way is this news or a research paper?

  3. Jim says:

    It’s a publish or perish paper. It’s accurate to what they studied. No effect. And to ask for more funds to see how to model data to fit the outcome wanted. But, it did lead to a question of what is heating the water in the areas mentioned. There was no discussion of how or why the area was warmer or colder. Just that it occured. Like a historical paper without the data.

  4. oldbrew says:

    growing recognition of the Arctic’s role in driving extreme weather events in other parts of the world

    Says who? Sounds more like Phys.org spin than science.

    From the study:
    Recent studies suggested that the formation of WACC is complex and difficult to attribute, since a wavier pattern of the jet can be entirely caused by the atmospheric internal variability, undermining the effect of AA [refs. 14,15,16,17,18,19,20.] Despite the ongoing debate, a better understanding of WACC can improve the seasonal prediction of high-latitude climate, considering the importance of this mode in shaping weather and climate extremes in these regions.
    – – –
    AA = Arctic amplification

    ‘Ongoing debate’ – indeed.

  5. dscott8186 says:

    “Nonetheless, using climate projections from the Half degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts (HAPPI) experiments which were targeted to project future climate under 1.5°C to 2°C warming scenarios, the researchers found the WACC pattern to persist even when global temperatures rose.”

    In other words, they can tell the public the harsh winters they are experiencing is due to global warming. Warmth makes cold… Pay no attention to your thermometers, the facts before you are misleading, you shouldn’t base your conclusions on anecdotal data. This is why the experts should be making conclusions based on the science…

    This is the same BS they pull claiming warming oceans (global warming) makes more snow. I had that conversation with some people who insisted this was so until I pointed out that it takes “cold air” i.e. 32F to cause rain to create snow. Global warming doesn’t create cold air, it creates warm air.

    Mark my words, when the Thames River freezes they will claim it’s global warming and say you’re ignorant for saying otherwise. Baffle them with BS and the gullible will believe. Who are you going to believe? Me or your lying eyes?

  6. catweazle666 says:

    “…and turned to climate projection models”

    So more X-box science then…

  7. oldbrew says:

    NAO update 2023
    Harald Yndestad 03/04/2023
    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harald-Yndestad

    NAO index signature reveals an upcoming colder climate period.
    . . .
    Upcoming events

    A perfect stationary 74.4-year lunar driven NAO period has phase shifts (max/+0/min/-0/max) at the years: (max, 1986+18.6 = 2004.6), (+0, 2004.6+18.6=2023.2), (min, 2041.8), (-0, 2060.4), (max, 2079). The computed upcoming 74.4-year phase shifts reveals:

    — NAO index variations had a maximum approximately the year 2005
    — NAO index variations move into more negative states from 2023 to 2060.
    — NAO index signature reveals an upcoming colder climate period.

    The NAO-index variability is not well understood. This investigation confirm that the NAO winter index is controlled by a spectrum of lunar nodal periods. The Lunar nodal period signature is identified in North Atlantic temperature variations, Arctic ice extent, Arctic Ocean water circulation and Earth axis rotation. The NAO index signature periods are related to North Atlantic temperature at Arctic ice extent. A possible source of NAO is that Arctic ice extent behave as an isolator between warm sea water and cold air temperature.

    https://www.climateclock.no/2023/04/nao-update-2023/

  8. liardetg says:

    Erm, where’s the disappearing Arctic ice? 14Mkm2 as I write (you cherry picker!!) oh sorry Autumn Equinox will bottom out above 4Mkm2 as usual taking bets as usual, no takers as usual.