.
.
‘Sadly, climate science has morphed into climate rhetoric.’ — That’s what happens when a one-variable theory is proposed for a multi-variable system.
– – –
Andy Kessler writes at WSJ Can the Climate Heal Itself? Excerpts in italics with my bolds and added images.
Dissenters from the catastrophe consensus on warming are worth listening to.
Stop with all the existential-crisis talk. President Biden said, “Climate change is literally an existential threat to our nation and to the world.” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin also talks about the “existential threat” of climate change. National security adviser Jake Sullivan identifies an “accelerating climate crisis” as one reason for a “new consensus” for government picking winners and losers in the economy. Be wary of those touting consensus.
But what if the entire premise is wrong?What if the Earth is self-healing? Before you hurl the “climate denier” invective at me, let’s think this through. Earth has been around for 4.5 billion years— living organisms for 3.7 billion. Surely, an enlightened engineer might think, the planet’s creator built in
View original post 782 more words
Tallbloke's Talkshop 
Gramps is having an episode regarding extending his 70+ driving licence, “what if, what if, what if, what if, ” just about sums up the procedure – online / paper+ post. so since there is no climate emergency, what if, is too late to think about what if, what if, What if covid is BEING followed by those other new plandemics: then there will be no need to do ANYTHING. What if Mr P throws a tantrum over london or berlin etc and we get rid of the plonkers, will the Snivil Servus back down on these mantras. What if they make things worse, What if there’s a food shortage and we all starve before we freeze, What if What if
What if there is miraculously an UPRISING…. Better go see what Gramps is doing now…
Saighdear, do you need help to find your meds?
I hate how the anthropomorphism and Nature worship associated with the hysterical Global Warming cult infects every discussion. The title “Can the Climate Heal Itself?” is a typical example. Skeptics should not concede ground to the Global Warming activists by adopting their emotive vocabulary: it is the Global Warming Hypothesis – not Climate Change; and the Earth is not a living thing, let alone a person. What the author seems to be implying is that there might exist a stable equilibrium state to which the climate system will eventually return from time to time – like a fiendishly complicated pendulum. Why does he not say that instead? It is a plausible hypothesis and there is evidence for and against it. In the long term, however, it seems more likely that the Earth’s climate system is more of random walk bounded by the constraints of physics.
Can the Climate Heal Itself?
All they have to do is look at the Holocene, and the history of repeated civilisation collapse. Even the Archaeologists have abandoned their favourite explanations of gods and wars, and are now accepting severe climate change.
But for much different reasons than what are being told.
The only existential threat is this Doomsday Cult that requires we all impoverish ourselves to avoid impoverishing ourselves. There is not a single place on Earth where the majority of any given year has seen “climate change” at any point in the last 30 years. The vast majority of the time in the vast majority of places sees weather well within historical natural variability. At worst we see a slight change in distribution, nothing more.
[…] What If Climate is Self-Regulating? […]
Of course Climate is self regulating.
To retain an atmosphere long term it is necessary for the weight of an atmosphere to be suspended off the surface whilst not allowing it to be lost to space.
In effect the downward force of gravity needs to be offset by the upward pressure gradient force.
To that end, if the composition of the atmospheric gases changes then any thermal effect must be offset elsewhere.
The truth is that convective changes neutralise any warming effect from greenhouse gases in order to keep the system stable.
It follows that the enhanced surface temperature of planets beneath atmospheres is caused by convective overturning and not by radiative gases.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334067825_Return_to_Earth_A_New_Predictive_Model_of_the_Earth's_Climate
New York Lawmaker Wants To Ban Use Of Fossil Fuels In Making Wind Turbines And Solar Panels
If a bill banning the use of fossil fuels in the creation of green energy projects were to become law, it would be the end of renewable energy. There’s no feasible way to manufacture and transport wind turbines, solar panels and electric vehicles without fossil fuels.
June 07, 2023
https://cowboystatedaily.com/2023/06/07/new-york-lawmaker-wants-to-ban-use-of-fossil-fuels-in-making-wind-turbines-and-solar-panels/
– – –
Climate hypocrites on the hook 😁
More CO2/less O2 and high rise of UV index/skincancer and irregular weather patterns we see since since 1960 are related, cause airliners in jetstream since 1952 halved ozonelayer, visible not only at the poles like in 80’s but also between 30 degree north- 30 degree south latitude (UVindex up to 15!). More UV damages esp. fythoplankton in ocean who can absorb less CO2/give less O2 so more CO2 is not the cause but result of it, and that’s not climate change or even global warming. https://unitedworld.earth/ban-airliners-from-jetstream-worlwide/
btw I couldn’t find any proof of IPCC’s statements, so looked at other reasons after a local man in his 90’s in newspaper said he never got sunburned up to after WOII, so what changed then? the ozonelayer cause of airliners in jetstream. The”greedy elites” did it again and they came up with the worldwide religion of global warming/climate change.