To what extent can ground conditions affect the weather, rather than the other way round? This study claims to have found something new, saying: ‘Since 2000, frequent “stuck” weather patterns have produced heat waves over Greenland, resulting in exceptional melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet’ – which begs the question: What started, or stopped, happening in or around 2000 to cause such patterns? The answer given is: ‘Observations have revealed a more prevalent negative phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)’. In other words, a natural phenomenon. Getting to the bottom of what the paper says depends partly on interpreting what they mean by statements like this: ‘One question is whether this is a consequence of climate change.’
– – –
Jet streams are relatively narrow bands of strong wind in the upper atmosphere, typically occurring around 30,000 feet, and blowing west to east, says Phys.org.
Their normal flows lead to week-to-week weather variations, modulated in the mid-latitudes by ridges and troughs in the jet stream. A high-pressure ridge, for example, produces clear, warmer weather conditions; a trough is typically followed by stormy conditions.
Together, these form waves in the jet stream that can stall as the waves grow and become more amplified, causing “stuck” weather patterns that produce longer storms and heat waves.
New research published in Nature Communications describes observations linking increased warming at high latitudes and the ever-decreasing snow cover in North America to these stalls in atmospheric circulation.
“These persistent and extreme conditions are thought to be increasing in the future as a result of this increased waviness in the jet stream,” said the study’s lead author Jonathon Preece, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Georgia.
Since 2000, frequent “stuck” weather patterns have produced heat waves over Greenland, resulting in exceptional melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet.
In contrast to these observations, global climate models actually project a slight decrease in the blocked patterns over Greenland and, consequently, the models have under-represented the contribution of meltwater runoff from the ice sheet to global sea level rise.
“These patterns have been consistently creating pulses of melting over the Greenland ice sheet that have been accounting for a large portion of the annual melting,” said study co-author Marco Tedesco, a professor at Columbia Climate School’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, and lead principal investigator on the project. “Accounting for such an aspect is crucial for anticipating not only how much but how fast Greenland is and will be contributing to sea level rise.”
“One question is whether this is a consequence of climate change that we can expect to continue in the future [that] the climate models are failing to resolve,” said Preece. “Or are the climate models correct, in which case we’d expect things to revert back to the norm and perhaps the rate of accelerated melt of the ice sheet will taper some?”
The new study presents evidence of a link to climate change, both in the increases in jet-stream waviness and ever-decreasing spring North American snow cover extent, which “is impacting the atmosphere in a way that is favoring these blocked high-pressure systems over Greenland,” Preece said.
Full article here.
– – –
Research paper: Summer atmospheric circulation over Greenland in response to Arctic amplification and diminished spring snow cover (2023)







How can an analysis that looks at a 1979–2022 study period be used to say anything about climate change?
Hubert Lamb hypothesized that cooling caused amplification. He claimed that warming would create a more powerful jet which would decrease the waveness.
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.
Lower solar activity: trend of spotless days sharply up since 1996 solar cycle (23) started.
Cycles 17-22: declined from 384 to 257 per cycle.
Cycles 23 and 24: 619 and 914.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_cycles
Graphic for SCs back to 1750 (move the slider)…
https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/solar-cycle/historical-solar-cycles.html
And here’s me thinking “TheScience” was supposed to be settled…
I’m going with Dr. Judah Cohen at AER finding that the polar vortex is linked to Autumn snow cover in higher NH latitudes.
https://rclutz.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/cohen-schematic2.png?w=760&zoom=2
There’s ever decreasing North American snow cover? Many resorts were skiing way past normal closure time this year. I do wish research would use actual data rather than trend or average. Something happening at a given point in time can only be caused by conditions then, not any average or trend.
“By contrast…climate models predict the opppsite”.
So either the models are wrong or it’s not caused by climate change.
I’m surprised that nobody has picked up on the bbc reporting that it was the changing GULF stream causing all this.
climate change to ‘lazier’ jet stream…. uhuh, I note it says RESEARCH, not Science, but maybe, just MAYBE it’s a LAZIER scientists and Journalists reporting.?
So does Stagnant mean Equilibrium? Could that be a good thing? would that imply some form of resonance, and with what ?…. don’t make me larf – “linked with/to climchange” …. Oh the Science …! – no much better than some of the Engineers, hu, about as good asour politicians… what’s the commonality ? Ah! SOSHUL Media and weekend entertainment – plant based, perhaps ?
The research article also says:
Multiple studies have highlighted the discrepancy between climate models and observations.
– – –
Obviously no climate change in Britain this week 🙄
BBC managed to spit it out:
Monthly Outlook
Last updated 15:57 BST on Friday 14 July
Summary
An unsettled pattern lasts until early August
There is no sign of any lengthy period of dry weather through the rest of July or into August, nor will there be any strong warmth developing.
Temperatures will be slightly below average initially, rising to near seasonal or just a shade above at times in the next couple of weeks or so. [bold added]
The research paper, which never mentions carbon dioxide, says:
However, there has not yet been a direct investigation of possible teleconnections linking snow cover variability and Greenland blocking.
Figure 9 title: Illustration of the link between North American snow cover and atmospheric circulation over Greenland.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39466-6/figures/9
Caption: Low spring snow cover causes early depletion of soil moisture over eastern North America (brown shading). The dry conditions that follow produce a warm surface anomaly that persists into July (orange shading). This anomalous heating of the near-surface atmosphere induces a stationary Rossby wave response that propagates northeastward (yellow arrow) and favors high-pressure ridging over Greenland—conditions which are known to augment melt of the Greenland Ice Sheet (blue shading). Red H denotes high pressure; blue L denotes low pressure.
– – –
There are other studies with different ideas, e.g. in contrast to the ‘exceptional melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet’ of the research paper here, we find:
Published: 16 December 2021
Slow-down in summer warming over Greenland in the past decade linked to central Pacific El Niño
Greenland warming and ice loss have slowed down since the early 2010s, in contrast to the rest of the Arctic region.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-021-00329-x
Huh, who needs meteorologists when you have these great guys. https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/uk-s-nap3-climate-plan-criticised-for-lack-of-ambition
No trend in July snow cover for N. America and Greenland since the late 1980s…
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/snow-and-ice-extent/snow-cover/namgnld/7
Ditto August…
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/snow-and-ice-extent/snow-cover/namgnld/8
I’m having to bite my tongue / bide my time: Incidents a’where so that spare parts cannot be delivered on time: …. so, extreme weather , eh? AyeEXTREME CALM where’s the wind today, seen any Sun what’s wrong with the panels? -covered in all that extra tree and grass/ wildflower pollen? https://gridwatch.co.uk/ less than 1GW wind and if you’re not home before the sun sets, you’ll have to share the small load in the solar tank 3.7GW this now. How many Cars + Phones + Drills does that fill?
When will the “noise” media learn that CO2 is NOT a climate change force? Observed evidence (geologic, ice core, contemporary recorded) unequivocally reveals no correlation between changing atmospheric CO2 and changing global average surface temperature! No correlation means no causation possible. Time for the noise media to wake up!
Here are their findings. Make sense of that if you can:
“The top row of Fig. 5 details the lagged relationship between antecedent SCE area over the Northern Hemisphere as a whole and June, July, and August monthly atmospheric circulation over Greenland. Partitioning summer into its constituent months reveals a clear negative lagged correlation signature relating July Sag and GBI to spring Northern Hemisphere SCE, with significant correlations extending as far back as the preceding April. The sign of the lagged correlation indicates that low spring Northern Hemisphere SCE is typically followed by an increase in July sinuosity over the North Atlantic and an attendant increase in Greenland blocking. This negative lagged correlation signature is mirrored by a positive correlation between the principal-component-based NAO index of Hurrell43 and antecedent SCE; however, only the relationship with June SCE is significant at α = 0.05. The lagged regression plots for June and August atmospheric conditions show no apparent lagged relationship with spring SCE (Fig. 5).
Considering SCE area over North America and Eurasia individually likewise suggests a lack of a lagged correlation between spring SCE and either June or August circulation over Greenland (Fig. 5). There is a positive correlation between February SCE over North America and August circulation over Greenland (Fig. 5i); however, given the strong seasonality of snow cover, the isolated nature of this result does not present compelling evidence of a lagged relationship, and a plausible physical mechanism underlying such a relationship is not immediately clear. Examining the two continental regions separately does, however, clarify that the lagged signature evident for the Northern Hemisphere as a whole is primarily driven by a relationship with snow cover over North America (Fig. 5h).
It appears the significant correlation between the July NAO and June Northern Hemisphere SCE (Fig. 5b) is primarily a reflection of the relationship with SCE over Eurasia (Fig. 5e). This result is consistent with previous work showing that there is an increase in the poleward propagation of Rossby waves in years of low June Eurasian SCE that acts to enforce the negative phase of the Northern Annular Mode during summer months42—an atmospheric state which supports more frequent high-latitude blocking, including over Greenland2,3,44. Previous work has also shown that spring Eurasian SCE exerts a far-reaching influence on the summer stationary wave pattern33; however, this previous analysis did not inform on July conditions over Greenland. While Eurasian SCE may also play a role, the results presented in Fig. 5 clearly show a more robust relationship with spring snow cover over North America.”
What they seem to be saying is that the only significant relationship is with June snow cover and July Greenland circulation, and that only for snow cover in North America.
primarily driven by a relationship with snow cover over North America
Snow cover caused by…???
Hmmm, Underground climate change anyone? https://earthsky.org/earth/underground-climate-change-cities-infrastructure/?mc_cid=56f849a29a&mc_eid=7e676c447d#:~:text=happening%20under%20cities%3F-,Underground%20climate%20change,-Posted%20by