We’re told ‘the exact cause or resulting consequences of this greening are not known’, but the media spin says ‘it’s not good news’. The unhealthy obsession with climate gloom and doom in certain quarters has spilled over here. The massive and ongoing greening trend is decribed as ‘a warning sign, like the canary in the mine’ (which of course expires). Really?
– – –
Research led by physicists and geographers at the University of Cambridge has unveiled some large-scale changes in the vegetation in the South American Andes which may have dramatic impact on the environment and ecosystems of the region, says Phys.org.
Analyzing satellite data spanning the past 20 years, the research team based at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge examined how vegetation has been changing along the Pacific coast of Peru and northern Chile.
This area is known for its unique and delicate arid and semi-arid environments.
The analysis revealed that certain areas experienced positive vegetation growth, known as greening, while others displayed negative trends, referred to as browning. Unsurprisingly, the changes in vegetation are influenced by things like farming and urban development or change in land use practices.
But more interestingly this study, published in Remote Sensing, revealed the discovery of a huge section of the West Slope of the Andes undergoing significant greening in the past 20 years. This section, which extends from Northern Peru to Northern Chile, spanning a length of about 2000km, has seen its vegetation growing significantly over time.
This greening trend varies with altitude, with different vegetation types at different elevations.
The research team, consisting of mathematicians, geographers, biologists, and earth scientists, used satellite images from 2000 to 2020 to observe changes in vegetation over time in this area.
They plotted 450 data points and developed a mathematical model to remove artificial variations (such as cloudy days) and seasonality, and used statistical analysis to ensure that they were only analyzing areas with a significant trend.
“It took three years to sort the methodology and the statistical model,” said Hugo Lepage, mathematician at the Cavendish laboratory and first author of the study. “We really needed to bulletproof it to make sure that something was really happening on a massive scale, and it was not just a fluke.”
. . .
The results of this study have far-reaching implications for environmental management and policymaking in the region. Although the exact cause or resulting consequences of this greening are not known, any large change (30-60% index increase) in vegetation will necessarily have an impact on ecosystems and the environment.
“The Pacific slope provides water for two-thirds of the country, and this is where most of the food for Peru is coming from too,” said Barnes. “This rapid change in vegetation, and to water level and ecosystems, will inevitably have an impact on water and agricultural planning management.”
The researchers believe their findings will contribute significantly to the scientific community’s understanding of the complex interactions between climate change and delicate ecosystems in arid and semi-arid environments.
“This is a warning sign, like the canary in the mine. There is nothing we can do to stop changes at such a large scale. But knowing about it will help to plan better for the future,” concluded Lepage.
Full article here.







Even with their models, they’ll still be unable to plan ahead of any changes.
A bit late to the party: the planet has been greening for at least the past 30 years. This from 2016 –
In a paper published in Nature Climate Change, we show that the Earth has been getting greener over the past 30 years. As much as half of all vegetated land is greener today, and remarkably, only 4% of land has become browner.
Our research shows this change has been driven by human activities, particularly the rising concentration of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in the atmosphere. This is perhaps the strongest evidence yet of how people have become a major force in the Earth’s functioning.
[reply] what research?
eeek—oh–noooo
there is something green in your garden
hurry, rush to the store and buy some glyphosate so that we can turn it brown.
One wonders:
What the hell is wrong with these people?
another gaggle of Chicken Littles crying doom and gloom because the rise in CO2 and temperature is causing greening to go on all over the planet while predicting the end of us if we don’t turn in our backyard grills and vehicles. *spit* What a load of codswallop.
Nothing a few thousand gallons of Agent Orange won’t cure.
Save the deserts!
‘the exact cause or resulting consequences of this greening are not known’
But humans must be implicated somehow 🙄
So they played computer games which left out half of the variables to let them get the answer they wanted, and these idiots call themselves scientists. They need to get out into the real world and smell the roses but doing real work is beneath them – they wouldn’t know where to start.
So they don’t know the cause (“exact” hiding a great deal there) but will develop policies to stop it.
Let me guess – the policies will involve banning things politicians don’t like.
JULY 22, 2023
Greenland has greener history than previously thought
“We’re discovering the ice sheet is much more sensitive to climate change than we previously thought,” says Utah State University geoscientist Tammy Rittenour. “This is a foreboding wake-up call.”
. . .
The melting caused at least five feet of sea-level rise around the globe, she says. “Some of our model scenarios suggest sea levels up to 20 feet higher than today.”
“It was an unusually long period of warming with moderately elevated levels of carbon dioxide—CO2—in the atmosphere,” Rittenour says. “What’s alarming about this finding is today’s CO2 levels are 1.5 times higher.”
https://phys.org/news/2023-07-greenland-greener-history-previously-thought.html
– – –
Which means climate change occurs in Greenland anyway, whether humans like it or not. But it’s another ‘wake-up call’? Wokeists like that phrase – what’s their plan?
“What’s alarming about this finding is today’s CO2 levels are 1.5 times higher.”
What’s alarming for alarmists is that CO2 then was 1.5 times lower than today (pre-industrial era territory), but with ‘sea levels up to 20 feet higher than today’. Join the dots…
I’ve not read this anywhere (tho i’m sure it could be out there), but I would expect this type of greening to occur…
So the CO2 level jacks from about 370 to 415 during just this study period as it continues its modern era climb. Wouldn’t the partial pressure of CO2 follow and cause the individual “treeline” for differing plant species to creep uphill and thereby increase the vegetative density at each altitude? I’d think this would occur even without any warming. Also, more organic veggie matter then accumulating in elevated soils would hold more moisture and perhaps help other plants that the CO2 increase alone might not otherwise impact as much.
The Mauna Loa record show the CO2 trajectory has been climbing at a steady pace for decades… what about the partial pressure to feed plants at elevation? As a non-scientist without the training for this, I’m just sayin’.
From 2016:
Greening of the Earth and its drivers
Abstract
Global environmental change is rapidly altering the dynamics of terrestrial vegetation, with consequences for the functioning of the Earth system and provision of ecosystem services.
Yet how global vegetation is responding to the changing environment is not well established.
Here we use three long-term satellite leaf area index (LAI) records and ten global ecosystem models to investigate four key drivers of LAI trends during 1982–2009. We show a persistent and widespread increase of growing season integrated LAI (greening) over 25% to 50% of the global vegetated area, whereas less than 4% of the globe shows decreasing LAI (browning).
Factorial simulations with multiple global ecosystem models suggest that CO2 fertilization effects explain 70% of the observed greening trend, followed by nitrogen deposition (9%), climate change (8%) and land cover change (LCC) (4%). CO2 fertilization effects explain most of the greening trends in the tropics, whereas climate change resulted in greening of the high latitudes and the Tibetan Plateau.
LCC contributed most to the regional greening observed in southeast China and the eastern United States. The regional effects of unexplained factors suggest that the next generation of ecosystem models will need to explore the impacts of forest demography, differences in regional management intensities for cropland and pastures, and other emerging productivity constraints such as phosphorus availability.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3004
Towards alternative energy and CO2 sources for Dutch greenhouses
March 2022
The Dutch greenhouse horticulture sector uses 9 percent (!) of the total gas used in The Netherlands. The gas is used by greenhouses to operate WKKs (Warmte Kracht Koppelingen), which produce electricity (light), heat and CO2, three important ingredients for the growth of crops. CO2 enrichment in greenhouses allows crops to meet their photosynthesis potential and the supply of extra CO2 increases the yield of greenhouse crops.
https://www.tudelft.nl/2022/energy-transition-lab/towards-alternative-energy-and-co2-sources-for-dutch-greenhouses
“The research team, consisting of mathematicians, geographers, biologists, and earth scientists, used satellite images from 2000 to 2020 to observe changes in vegetation over time in this area.
They plotted 450 data points and developed a mathematical model to remove artificial variations (such as cloudy days) and seasonality, and used statistical analysis to ensure that they were only analyzing areas with a significant trend.
“It took three years to sort the methodology and the statistical model,”
So they played with a computer game of their design and chosing and still didn’t like the results they got no matter how hard they tried.
Nice work if you can get it, Ray!
[…] Posted on August 9, 2023 by HiFast The Pacific slope of Peru is greening, say Cambridge researchers – but they don’t like i… […]