Another blow for net-zero dogmatists. More evidence that cheap offshore wind power doesn’t exist and nobody can control its costs, or be sure of a good level of reliability.
– – –
Global Underwater Hub (GUH) is leading the charge to tackle failures in underwater cables which could derail global offshore wind ambitions, says AGCC.
The trade body, which champions the UK’s £8billion underwater industry, says that reliability of subsea cables is “paramount” to the success of offshore wind and the energy transition.
But failure of these cables is all too common, to the point that the cost of insuring them is becoming prohibitive.
GUH chief executive, Neil Gordon, said: “It’s estimated that around 85% of the total value of offshore wind insurance claims relate to subsea cables. Insurers are losing money underwriting cables with the average settlement claim in the region of £9million. Brokers have warned that the high number of cable claims is affecting capacity and coverage and the cost of repairs typically runs into millions, with warranties rarely covering the high cost of business interruption.
“If these critical components become uninsurable, offshore wind projects around the world will be derailed, making global 2050 net zero targets completely unachievable.”
Globally, over £620billion of investment in offshore windfarms is anticipated by 2030 and, for the world to hit net-zero emissions by 2050, the generating capacity from offshore wind must increase by a staggering 1,120 GW. The subsea cable sector for offshore wind has been estimated at £100billion over the next ten years.
Mr Gordon added: “This scale of expansion and opportunity can only be achieved by installing and maintaining thousands of miles of reliable cables under the seabed.
“There is an urgent need for a holistic approach to finding solutions which can be implemented as offshore wind increases in scale and technical capability with higher voltages and dynamic elements.”
. . .
Mr Gordon explained: “With the shift from fixed to floating offshore wind, where the dynamic nature of floating cables is even more challenging, the critical issue of their reliability must be addressed as a matter of urgency.
“It’s clear there are inherent issues affecting the performance and reliability of subsea cables that are within the industry’s control. Failures can stem from any stage in the cable lifecycle – from design to manufacture, handling and installation, through to operation and maintenance.”
Full article here.







Yes, I ( we)’ve told them and told them and told them…. but ‘they’ don’t listen. Hmm, should have started a website section just for that. ( Y don’t u –I hear someone say …)
Neighbour told me this morning that last night’s Countryfile Farmer grubbed up apple trees – no longer wanted etc by supermarkets – IMPORT IMPORT.
Whatever happened to the monthly News updates on our “Balance of Payments” – remember that? – so Gramps tells me.
The Weakest Link: now I’m not a Bike afficionado: CHAINS or quieter belts, we have enough chains to give headaches on our machinery, no engines with timing belts either: Good solid shaft & gear transmissions (or, actually Hydrostatic ( oil drives) is a misnomer – should be Hydrodynamic ( But like HiLo Range or Ratio – is so widely misunderstood in that daft popular press), So why do we have all these ROTTEN ELEMENTS in our Power ? National ENERGY system ? There are chains & Chains, but if a link breaks ( Simplex…Triplex}, sowhat it’s BROKE. Gimme a good solid positive DRIVE. Then I can plan ahead and do things.
I was UP in the Hills & Glens again at work and experienced a laughable forecasted Hurricane Tail-ender. Yes it was warmish 15C and a not -so-unpleasant experience being out of the shed or machine, and on the way home, stopping to collect Anniversary Chestnut & Oak seed – an eye-closing experience ( never knew there are so many different ‘varieties’ of HORSE Chestnuts + what looks likely to be even Sweet chestnut growing up here) … and then there was the Cycle race holding up traffic AGAIN – OK a Detour or wait. Range anxiety? No – only the additional COST of burning Diesel this now 169ppl and therefore the ANGER at those Spoked&Chain Jockeys. Now can you just imagine the RANGE ANXIETY which I WOULD have had in one of ‘their’ EVs. …. Reading headlines about EV Sales this now, Greetin blah blah. If I ran out of Liquid fuel, no problem, one can pour a gallon or twae in to get you going again. ..but EV’s I have no Range anxiety with EV’s – I just won’t ever be using them for long undeterminable mileage trips where there are likely to be Plonker Jockies around in between.
So Lets STOP adding to the Cabling links NOW – and as an aside ( another one) Our Air is “polluted” with Radio transmission: WHY Dig up the soil to lay cables for TV / ability to watch such broadcasts ( Fiber BB never fast enough??? ) and then go and discard Land Line Telephones in favour of Mobiles. ( Bad or zero reception)
[…] Thanks to Oldbrew at Tallblokes Talkshop […]
Various comments re. our blog post, here…
https://joannenova.com.au/2023/10/failing-underwater-cables-pose-global-threat-to-offshore-wind/
[…] Thanks to Oldbrew at Tallblokes Talkshop […]